Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
leopold

That may or may not be true, Happeh is most certainly a loon and everything he's said thus far is complete garbage - so, that may just be more drivel.
 
I probably missed that part. Where is he teaching children? Is he a teacher? A counsellor of some sort?
 
it's an inference
he has a website that teaches his drivel with cartoons
that implies to me children

edit
his site is divided into two parts one for children one for adults

and happeh if you can not respond to my replies then DO NOT refer to me in yours.
 
Ophiolite

Happeh made a post in this very thread refering to his so-called ability to explain his masturbation theory to children, who apparently completely understood him - he was making a comparison to us.
 
Ophiolite said:
I probably missed that part. Where is he teaching children? Is he a teacher? A counsellor of some sort?
Click to expand...
as far as i can tell he is a nobody
he hasn't produced any credentials at all, none
 
Ophiolite said:
Thank you (Q). I didn't doubt Leo's claim, I just hadn't seen the relevant post(s).
Click to expand...
i don't consider that doubt
i consider that as being thorough, making sure
 
sorry about the rant guys

i earned the nickname of "the wild man" at work
a place i worked at for 10 years for taking on the boss for treating the workers like shit. i must be back there.
 
I suspect that if he were a teacher or counsellor, he would have been fired/arrested long ago for teaching such nonsense to children.

I also suspect his claim of doing so is as vacuous as his others. Most likely there is nothing to worry about.
 
You will find that use of the ignore list makes many threads not only shorter, but more intelligible. If you feel you are missing out on something you can always take a sneaky look at the odd post.
 
Happeh said:
Most are. Backstabbers. Liars. Deceitful. Controlling Witches. If you know what is good for you, never turn your back on one.
Click to expand...

Lovley to hear such a nice generalization of "my kind".

But this is some interesting information. Is this why, Happeh, you are agianst sex and mastrubation so much?...because it makes you think of "scum" women? Surely you're not gay, because you seem to dislike them too.
 
I think we can all conclude that Happeh has had anything but a Happy life. Such deep seated hatred, paranoia and sexual dysfunction does not happen overnight.
 
Ophiolite said:
You will find that use of the ignore list makes many threads not only shorter, but more intelligible. If you feel you are missing out on something you can always take a sneaky look at the odd post.
Click to expand...
he might as well be banned as far as i am concerned.
if you have any questions about anything he posts about me please ask me about it.

i will not take a sneaky look, i'll go blind if i do. :)
 
crazyfreespirit said:
Lovley to hear such a nice generalization of "my kind".

But this is some interesting information. Is this why, Happeh, you are agianst sex and mastrubation so much?...because it makes you think of "scum" women? Surely you're not gay, because you seem to dislike them too.
Click to expand...

like i said elsewhere he is a monster. a predator

female. yes he's against them too.
 
leopold

I would suggest taking a day or two and think about the situation. Here we have a completely certifiable loon who is clearly out of touch with reality. It is, at the very least, a pitiful situation. However, if Happeh is happy to continue his course of action, which by now is evident he will, we can simply be entertained with his antics and all have a good chuckle.

And quite frankly, the less I masturbate, the worse my eyes get. Go figure.
 
I don't care what category the thread is in. I am posting here because it says masturbation in the title.
Click to expand...

Then it would seem pertinent to state that you are not actually doing much else than trolling. You claim to have a 'theory' concerning health and masturbation. You then go and post that 'theory' in a religious forum. Perhaps it's just me, but surely your time would be better spent submitting your 'theory' somewhere more appropriate?

Is it perhaps that you thought if you posted your 'theory' in a religious forum you might, for the first time ever, get people to actually agree with you, (given that many religious people view masturbation as a sin)? It would seem to me that you're reaching, hoping that you can find anyone so amazingly ignorant of science and reality to actually agree with you. Alas, even on a religious forum you got taken apart.

What is most astounding to me is how you try and accuse others of being "unscientific", when the fact of the matter is you don't have the slightest idea whatsoever as to what science is or how it works. I told you some 20 pages ago that photographs of a man squinting and then claiming it to be because he wanks too much is not science, and although you cannot argue against that fact, you do keep trying. While I will happily give you 10 points for persistence, you get a big fat 0 on every other count.

There is no science here, just a person with more 'demons' than I would care to count trying to find his way in life. Clearly science is not the way for you, and to be honest right now I do not know what is - other than a lot of time spent talking to someone paid to help people just like you.

I think it well about time that you sat down and spent some time contemplating the situation. You have told us all that you have been banned from many forums - and have faced adversity everywhere you go. You can clearly see here that not one person agrees with you - several of them scientists in their own specific fields, and that seemingly nobody has ever agreed with you, (save for your own statement that you've met 1 or 2 that did). Give it some thought and you might come to the conclusion that it isn't them that are deluded, misguided, or 'untrained', but that it is you. Are you willing to at least accept the possibility that you might be wrong? That 'Happeh theory' is not based upon anything credible, but an experience of your own youth that has biased you to see things in a way unhinged from actual reality?

If the hand is used for masturbation instead of an outiside device like a vagina, it interferes with the physiological changes. It causes them to be imbalanced. This makes total sense if you consider it. You are using 1 hand to masturbate. Whichever hand it is, that side is working hard, the other arm and hand just hang there doing nothing.
Click to expand...

While I would disagree that the other arm just hangs there doing nothing, (although that would be something different for each individual), I am willing to accept it for now. The problem I see is that while constantly masturbating with one hand might, (and that's a serious 'might'), cause a slight difference between your hands and arms, I see no validity in stating that doing so will then cause blindness, loss of limbs and a person to turn gay. Where is the relevance to masturbating with your right hand and then changing sexuality as a direct result of that, or indeed losing your eyesight? You have unfortunately provided no mechanism that would cause eye trouble from hand excercise. You did state that I, and probably every other human being on the planet, has a flawed understanding of the human body. I have given you the opportunity to provide me with an accurate understanding of the human body, but alas am still waiting.

For any of us to actually proceed, we need you to provide us with an accurate representation of the human body. A detailed model is what is needed - a photo of a film star or prostitute is not sufficient. I would suggest going on google and finding some design software. Most will have a free trial which means you do not need to be a millionaire or have a laboratory. All you do require is a computer, and we can see you already have one of those. You will not have to spend one penny to be able to provide us with what we need to appreciate and understand your claims. I am even willing to go one step further and do all the work for you. My Photoshop skills are quite impressive, so just tell me how the right hand is linked to eyelids, your left leg and sexuality and I'll get right on it.

This is what you won't understand. I have to create some example or visual image that makes sense to you.
Click to expand...

So what is stopping you? This is your theory happeh, nobody elses. Seemingly you're expecting everyone to just agree with it without you having to do any work whatsoever to reach that goal. I would have been vastly more impressed if you had have done this work before making the claims. Your various blogs are little more than openly promoted naivety and contain nothing of any substance to anyone. We can all hijack some pictures of a stiff penis from the internet, (although I can only question why anyone would want to).

What I would ask is that you take the time to draw up the human form - as you believe it to be. Provide detailed links to how the hand and penis are connected to eyesight and you'll find much less adversity on forums such as this one. I have even stated that I will do the work for you, so you clearly have nothing to lose.

You can imagine yourself as two large cylinders next to each other.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid I can't, because that is not an accurate representation of the human form. Regardless to what you think, we do not in any way, shape, or form, resemble the 'energiser bunny'.

Trying to give me an accurate representation of the human body while referring to the energiser bunny is, well, ridiculous.

The act of masturbation will distort these cylinders so that they are no longer cylindrical, and they might change vertical height, as in shrinking. For good health, these cylinders should be cylindrical and proper height. As masturbation changes the height or shape of these cylinders, the body will show signs of ill health.
Click to expand...

Ok, so with overly exerted masturbation these cylinders change height. What mechanism then causes that height differential to cause blindness?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top