Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
crazyfreespirit said:
xxx-30-porn-star-portraits.jpg


This woman is also a "sex worker"...her neck seems fine to me. There are more pictures of neck-healthy sex workers, but they're...not fit for sciforums. *cough*

Ok so mastrubation and sex causes blindness and neck problems and a multitude of other things. Almost everyone has sex and/or mastrubates...why is our entire population not suffering from failing vision or lopsided-headitis?

What makes you think they are not? I said somewhere there is a plot to turn the society into weak minded people so they are easy to control. It would be most likely that the people behind this would do this to the entire target population.

Look at your TV. What is on it every hour of every day? Sex. Who controls the TV? They are responsible for what is going on the air. They are responsible for putting out ideas that make people sick.

As for your picture, this is where experience comes in. Experience that I have an other people do not. Inspect your picture closely. Yes her head is straight. Does the right side of her head look dark? Yes. There is a thin silver on the right side of the face. That is the damaged area.

Compare the face. The face is not bilaterally symmetric. The left side of the face is fat and thick. The right side of the face is thin and atrophied.
 
cole grey said:
You'll have to do better than that, hap.
You don't even have information about that guy. He could be a drug-free virgin, for all we know.
Also, people in advertisements don't actually work at the establishments. How many times have you seen ronald mcdonald working the fry cooker?

You are running away from what is obvious. I plainly said when it come down to the reason, you must trust me the way you trust any expert that knows more than you.
 
Raithere said:
ROTFL

Umm... Happeh, perhaps you never noticed this in your extensive studies of the human body but humans can turn their heads, bend their necks, and change their facial expressions voluntarily.

Unless you have some demonstrable reason to presume otherwise Ockham's Razor would suggest that the simplest explanation is that these pictures are simply voluntary expressions and positions.

Sure I have a demonstrable reason. Excessive sex, excessive masturbation, excessive physical exercise, snorting of drugs, injection of drugs.

Raithere said:
It is also worth noting that peoples' faces (particularly men's faces) are rarely perfectly symmetrical.

So what if they are. Why are they not perfectly symmetrical. If you truly have knowledge, explain why.

Raithere said:
The dark blotches on the side of the face are shadows (as Wes pointed out) and the ones under the eyes are simply signs of aging and perhaps not enough sleep.

You are wrong. You are a layman. I am an expert. The blotch is a sign of the damage to that side of his head.

Raithere said:
More to the point, even if these were symptoms you have no actual data to support your assertions, you're merely presuming to know the frequency of their sexual activities based upon the "symptoms" you assign to sex/masturbation.
~Raithere

Oh god. Not data again. No there is no data. I am the pioneer of this theory. All I gotta say is they better name it after me because I have taken a lot of guff to put it in front of the world.
 
You say agian and agian that you are the expert. Where is the credibility, where is the evidence that you yourself have found, where are the studies you have conducted? I could very easily say that I am an authority on air. In fact, air kills you. You can tell by the angle of ones nose that they have, in fact, breathed air.
See? This is all the evidence you are providing, to say it is your theory and that it is true.
What do you expect? Of course we ask for data and proof.
 
Trust is not an integral part of the scientific testing process.
First trust then test?
No, first test then trust.
Or, if there are no tests, I don't want to hear no motherf***ing fools talking s**t and saying they have the definitive answer, and calling other people names.

I am interested in theories about improving our use or retention of human energies, but you don't trust someone who shows you two pictures that have any number of explanations, (a few of which are given above), to explain their still unproven theory.

You are just pulling my chain, on this whole issue.

I am beginning to tire of your game.
 
Why is the man twisting his body, neck, head and eyeballs to do something that a normal person can do with the eyeballs alone?

Note that he is twisting his head to the minimum extent possible to see what he is looking at. His eyes are as far to the left as they can go. He couldn't look at the person (or thing) to his left without moving his head, or optionally his entire body, though that would take more effort.

The women in this picture is a self admitted sex worker. As you can see in the picture, her head drops off to her right. As if her neck cannot support that side of the head.

Is she into "excessive" masterbation, though? Because you said that sex alone is not enough. Or have you changed your mind?

Turning to the second woman...

Yes her head is straight. Does the right side of her head look dark? Yes. There is a thin silver on the right side of the face. That is the damaged area.

... or it is a reflection caused by the reflective sheet used to illuminate that side of her face when the photograph was taken in a photographic studio.

Compare the face. The face is not bilaterally symmetric. The left side of the face is fat and thick. The right side of the face is thin and atrophied.

Nobody's face is bilaterally symmetric. I bet yours isn't.

You're not convincing anybody. Hell, we don't even know if these people masterbate or not, and, if so, how much.
 
Happeh said:
The context is irrelevant to the man's underlying physical condition. The pose he holds reveals the underlying condition in a more obvious way is the only relevance it might hold.

Do you think he's stuck that way? Is that the only expression of which he's capable? Do you think he could lean the other way if he desired? A single frame of his life isn't enough for me to reach many conclusions. I have a few guesses as I mentioned.

I haven't a clue why you'd think a single picture of a person as such, with no context - is not at all obvious to any underlying conditions.

The reasoning you have provided thus far doesn't at all convince me you have any insight into any condition these people may or may not have. There are people of most any age and condition who could and do reproduce similar expressions. At a whim, I can take a picture of myself with pretty much the same look on my face that guy has. Because I can make the face, you must conclude that I have the same condition.
 
Happeh said:
No it is not ridiculous if you have a proper view of the human body.

Then I guess my view is improper.

Think like a scientist. Just don't claim to be one.

I've made no such claim. I do however claim to be reasonable for the most part.

Why does tiliting the head indicate an invitation from the female of the human species to the male of the human species?

Because it shows interest. You'd understand that if you had a proper view of human interaction.

A dog in heat runs in front of the other dogs to give them a smell so they will come hither. That is for dogs. We know it is the smell that brings in the male dog.

How is that relevant?

Why does a male human being come to a female human being when they tilt their head?

LOL. If they do, it's because they see a sign of interest most likely. Certainly humans are animals, but surely you realize that human interaction isn't the same as that of a dog. A head tilt is a not so subtle invitation via a sign of interest. When people are interested in something, they often cock their head off to one side. It's just what they do, I don't know exactly why though I might be able to bullshit my way to a theory if you need one.

That is in depth science observation.

It is? Seems to my like one human observing another. I wouldn't call that scientific. Thus far you've produced nothing remotely scientific.
 
Happeh said:
What makes you think they are not? .

...the fact that most people aren't walking around with their heads tilted, and walking into things beacuse they can't see...

I said somewhere there is a plot to turn the society into weak minded people so they are easy to control. It would be most likely that the people behind this would do this to the entire target population.

Look at your TV. What is on it every hour of every day? Sex. Who controls the TV? They are responsible for what is going on the air. They are responsible for putting out ideas that make people sick.

What would they gain by making us blind....

As for the picture, I don't need to say anything, as all points have already been made by others.
 
crazyfreespirit said:
You say agian and agian that you are the expert. Where is the credibility, where is the evidence that you yourself have found, where are the studies you have conducted?

You are personally attacking me. I use the word expert to indicate one with experience in a given field. What is the point in questioning my expertise? We have been over 20 times that I am the originator of this theory. It is impossible to find corroborative evidence because of the definition of the english word "originator".

crazyfreespirit said:
What do you expect? Of course we ask for data and proof.

I see. You want evidence and proof, but you refuse to beleive the evidence of your own two eyes? You are well programmed.
 
Satyr said:
If masturbation is for losers then why do I always win at the end of it?

Same reason cocaine users and heroin users "win" after using drugs.

Then they wake up the next day.
 
cole grey said:
I am beginning to tire of your game.

I am beginning to tire of the constant yapping. Totally ignoring the visual evidence. Refusing to discuss the theories presented. Refusing to propose reasonable alternative theories.
 
James R said:
Is she into "excessive" masterbation, though? Because you said that sex alone is not enough. Or have you changed your mind?

Never changed my mind. Said Excessive Sex is a cause according to Happeh Theory about 20 times.

James R said:
... or it is a reflection caused by the reflective sheet used to illuminate that side of her face when the photograph was taken in a photographic studio.

Nope.

James R said:
Nobody's face is bilaterally symmetric. I bet yours isn't.

You are correct. My face is not bilaterally symmetric. It is all about degree. Just like you can drive on a car tire with 20 lbs of pressure in it, you can still function in life and look normal even though your body is not bilaterally symmetric.

But no one can deny that neither you nor the tire are working at design specifications. Humans are designed to be bilaterally symmetric. Tires are designed to run at 32 lbs of pressure.

James R said:
You're not convincing anybody. Hell, we don't even know if these people masterbate or not, and, if so, how much.

You don't know if an admitted sex worker masturbates or not?

You are only being resistive to my ideas. That reason makes no sense at all.

I am not done yet people. You think this is it? I don't know what I have to beat you over the head with to make you understand I am telling the truth.

Now that we have seen the head tilt and the sex worker, I can proceed to post the next 1000 pictures that all show sex workers with tilted heads. Yes, I can easily find 1000 pictures to corroborate my theory.

I keep swearing up and down I am being truthful. Everyone keeps calling me a liar. I hope you are not busy for the next few months. If I have to show you 1000 corroborative photos for you to trust me, we are going to be very busy.

If you would stop calling me a liar and insisting I am wrong, and put that energy into asking probing, thoughtful, intelligent questions, we could get it over much more quickly I would think.
 
wesmorris said:
Do you think he's stuck that way? Is that the only expression of which he's capable?.

No

wesmorris said:
Do you think he could lean the other way if he desired? .

Yes

wesmorris said:
I haven't a clue why you'd think a single picture of a person as such, with no context - is not at all obvious to any underlying conditions.

Experience. It is obvious to someone with experience. Just like a doctor sees illness that the untrained do not see. Someone goes to the doctor and finds out they have cancer. The patient didn't know, even though the cancer is in his body, because he does not have the training.

wesmorris said:
The reasoning you have provided thus far doesn't at all convince me you have any insight into any condition these people may or may not have. Because I can make the face, you must conclude that I have the same condition.

No. You only see the surface. You do not see what is underneath. That is my expertise. I keep saying expertise because that is what people want to hear. They want expert reassurance or a reassuring study. Maybe if I keep saying expert, it will slip into their programming and they will accept what I say.
 
wesmorris said:
Because it shows interest. You'd understand that if you had a proper view of human interaction.

That is too shallow. Why does it show interest?

wesmorris said:
How is that relevant?

I posted a well known method used by the female dog to gain the male dogs interest. We know it is smell. What is the reason for the interest of the male in a head tilting female?

Saying because it is human interaction is not an answer. Otherwise we could say the dogs like each other because of dog interaction and stop there. Scientists didn't stop there. They went further and found out smell was the real reason.

Go further. What is the real reason a head tilt is attractive to the male of he human animal.

wesmorris said:
LOL. If they do, it's because they see a sign of interest most likely. Certainly humans are animals, but surely you realize that human interaction isn't the same as that of a dog.

Why? We are talking, and some say intelligent, apes.

wesmorris said:
A head tilt is a not so subtle invitation via a sign of interest. When people are interested in something, they often cock their head off to one side. It's just what they do, I don't know exactly why though I might be able to bullshit my way to a theory if you need one.

See. You honestly have no idea. But you refuse to accept my idea. What if I told you that I don't know exactly why an electron spins the way it does, though I might be able to bullshit my way thru it. Would you hire me as a chemistry instructor?

wesmorris said:
It is? Seems to my like one human observing another. I wouldn't call that scientific. Thus far you've produced nothing remotely scientific.

Sure I have. You are refusing to admit it because it might affect you.

Anyone know anything about anthropology? I know just a smidge. I think it is a common thing to agree that science about human beings is very difficult because human beings will hide from the results if they are unpleasing.

If people really did find out masturbation affected them, what would all the people who read that propaganda story about masturbation being good for the prostrate, and started masturbating every day, think? They would realize they had been hurting themselves for who knows how long.

Humans would rather lie than face the truth in that situation. That is why it interferes with the science. I think that is why I get so much resistance from people. Everybody masturbates. When they hear me say they are making themselves sick, their first instinct is to say no, then they slam the door on me so they can't here me say it anymore.

It is just like drugs or any other problem. Hide from it and continue, or face up to it and try to repair things.
 
crazyfreespirit said:
...the fact that most people aren't walking around with their heads tilted, and walking into things beacuse they can't see...

What makes you say this? It is not true in my experience.

crazyfreespirit said:
What would they gain by making us blind....

Blindness is not the goal. The goal is physical and mental weakness, and gayness.

Excessive masturbation can make people go gay later in life.

Excessive masturbation will make you a cripple with a bad arm and a bad leg. If you are in a fight with someone, you will automatically back down because you are physically crippled.

Excessive masturbation will cause mental deteriotion with many various symptoms. The need to hurt people. Wild and loud emotions. The person will usually become solitary and unfriendly. Their ability to think deteriorates.


Blindness, deafness, anxiety, hip replacement surgery etc? Those are all just extras they make money off of. After you make yourself sick, you go to the doctor and pay money to get fixed. They don't fix you. They can't. The problem is masturbation and it's effect. That has to stop and some kind of physical therapy needs to take place to try and correct things.

Just like plastic surgery, it is all a money making thing. The current practice of plastic surgery everywhere is not ethical medicine. It is a profit making endeavor that will leave a large percentage of those patients with health problems later in life. Instead of instructing people properly about health and life, they agree to butcher people because it is profitable.

It is really quite a system. Imagine you are the ruler of a colony of slaves. The slaves work and you get most of their money. You let them keep some of it so they do not revolt. What you do to get the rest of the money is you train them to be spenders for no reason. Then for the people that resist spending, you teach them to make themselves sick by lying about health practicies. After they get sick because they followed the lying advice, here they come to the health practice with a pocketfull of whatever money they may have left. Begging to be cured.

After taxes, the meaningless spending, and the health care costs, you have extracted 90% of the money you paid to the slaves back out of them. You have happy slaves working for you at 10% of the money they think they are getting paid.

Slaves are great. They are stupid. You can take advantage of them any way you want.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top