seeing as you have evaded tis question twiceleopold99 said:i know a way to prove your theory
and you have not even mentioned it
lets see if you are smart enuogh to figure it out.
lets see if you evade it again
seeing as you have evaded tis question twiceleopold99 said:i know a way to prove your theory
and you have not even mentioned it
lets see if you are smart enuogh to figure it out.
I don’t know, how many? You mean the whole world says and agree on one thing and they are all wrong and you are right, right? Don’t be daft.How many times do I need to say incompetence or liars?
BS. Their position is entirely credible whereas yours is not.How many times do I need to say plot to make people weak and powerless?
Based on my own life experiences they are entirely consistent. From that I see no reason to believe anything to the contrary.Have you personally tested out any of what is said on those links? Do you know for a fact they are right?
Credibility – you have none, they do.Why are those links from unknown people on the internet any more trustworthy than me, an unknown person on the internet?
The scientific method is a proven best method. Can you demonstrate anything better?Do you believe that there is only one way to learn, the science way, or do you believe there are many ways to learn?
I read the entire thread and I know this community very well.Boy. You sure do take charge for everyone don't you? I never saw you post in this thread before and now you are speaking for everyone.
It is irrelevant what you think you know or what you actually know. If you want to convince others then you have no choice but to use the accepted and proven scientific system for presenting potential new knowledge.As for your suggestion, I don't think so. I am not like you. I don't need approval or permission to believe what I do. I know what I know.
You have not demonstrated that you are open to working with anyone else especially if they are in the least bit skeptical. Your attitude appears inconsistent with cooperative investigation.If anyone would good faith work with me, instead of spending every single post complaining how no one agrees with me, it would be easy to settle.
No. I have suggested you have this discussion in a more appropriate forum. This is the RELIGION forum and your topic has nothing to do with religion. Since I am a moderator here my action is entirely appropriate.Ah ha. Always happens. Some know it all who knows it all stops a discussion.
Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.It has happened to me in many forums.
Only when needed. That’s my job.Some authoritative person needs to exert their authority.
This is for religious debate not your personal non-religious soapbox. And as an atheist, don’t worry I have no pretensions regarding gods.Even though the forums are for discussion, this authoritative person feels they are god.
But this is the RELIGION forum and I guess here I am God, or at least one of two gods.They know exactly what is correct and what is not in the scientific world. Since they are god, they allow only what they feel is correct.
No it is called appropriate moderation and redirection to a more appropriate arena.It is called censorship.
No, nothing is being deleted and you can continue your discussion in a different forum if you wish.It is called stopping an alternative opinion based on nothing more than your desire to be right.
It has no relevance to religion so this is not the correct forum.I am leaving what I wrote because I wrote it and believed it. I hope that if you have a different opinion, you can see that it is better to leave the door open and continue the discussion than to slam the door shut.
The truth hurts, ouch!Cris said:Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.
(Thinking of how this thread progresses ... makes me think of masturbation ... mental ... character masturbation ...)
cole grey said:the guy has a grey hair.
he is guarded towards his right side.
his face is not symmetrical (few people's are).
I think what you are saying is, switch hands and everything is fine.
Cris said:Happeh,
I don’t know, how many? You mean the whole world says and agree on one thing and they are all wrong and you are right, right? Don’t be daft.
Cris said:BS. Their position is entirely credible whereas yours is not.
Cris said:Based on my own life experiences they are entirely consistent. From that I see no reason to believe anything to the contrary.
Cris said:Credibility – you have none, they do.
Cris said:The scientific method is a proven best method. Can you demonstrate anything better?
Cris said:It is irrelevant what you think you know or what you actually know. If you want to convince others then you have no choice but to use the accepted and proven scientific system for presenting potential new knowledge.
Cris said:You have not demonstrated that you are open to working with anyone else especially if they are in the least bit skeptical. Your attitude appears inconsistent with cooperative investigation.
Cris said:No. I have suggested you have this discussion in a more appropriate forum. This is the RELIGION forum and your topic has nothing to do with religion. Since I am a moderator here my action is entirely appropriate.
Cris said:Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.
leopold99 said:seeing as you have evaded tis question twice
lets see if you evade it again
of course you areHappeh said:I am ignoring you leopold. After I saw you say "I want to cum in their mouth" over in another thread, I was so appalled I vowed to never get near you again.
leopold99 said:of course you are
and it isn't for what you said.
after i made that comment you refered to, you asked if i would sign a release for you to put my picture in your book so don't use that as a moronic excuse happeh. you just can't figure it out can you.
let me expain happehHappeh said:You are right. I cannot figure it out.