Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
leopold99 said:
i know a way to prove your theory
and you have not even mentioned it
lets see if you are smart enuogh to figure it out.
seeing as you have evaded tis question twice
lets see if you evade it again
 
One eye seems to be squinting, sad mouth expression or perhaps just bored, Calvin Clein shirt with tie, about early fities, not much hair growth on beard nor mustach perhaps recently shaved that morning, wringle forehead.

Obviously though, I don't see anything here that would demonstrate this guy is wacking too much, nor would any PROFESIONAL doctor, seem to me that he lacks from wacking off so he wouldn't look so damned boared!. ;)

BTW not everyone beats their sausage with their hand there is alternatives, perhaps your to naive about sex to know of this here

This would indicate your damn theory is not at all accurate, many men can afford this devise and many do use it!. This would also indicate an even flow through the penis, as it is not a hand. What you say now?

Godless
 
Last edited:
Happeh,

How many times do I need to say incompetence or liars?
I don’t know, how many? You mean the whole world says and agree on one thing and they are all wrong and you are right, right? Don’t be daft.

How many times do I need to say plot to make people weak and powerless?
BS. Their position is entirely credible whereas yours is not.

Have you personally tested out any of what is said on those links? Do you know for a fact they are right?
Based on my own life experiences they are entirely consistent. From that I see no reason to believe anything to the contrary.

Why are those links from unknown people on the internet any more trustworthy than me, an unknown person on the internet?
Credibility – you have none, they do.

Do you believe that there is only one way to learn, the science way, or do you believe there are many ways to learn?
The scientific method is a proven best method. Can you demonstrate anything better?

Boy. You sure do take charge for everyone don't you? I never saw you post in this thread before and now you are speaking for everyone.
I read the entire thread and I know this community very well.

As for your suggestion, I don't think so. I am not like you. I don't need approval or permission to believe what I do. I know what I know.
It is irrelevant what you think you know or what you actually know. If you want to convince others then you have no choice but to use the accepted and proven scientific system for presenting potential new knowledge.

If anyone would good faith work with me, instead of spending every single post complaining how no one agrees with me, it would be easy to settle.
You have not demonstrated that you are open to working with anyone else especially if they are in the least bit skeptical. Your attitude appears inconsistent with cooperative investigation.

Ah ha. Always happens. Some know it all who knows it all stops a discussion.
No. I have suggested you have this discussion in a more appropriate forum. This is the RELIGION forum and your topic has nothing to do with religion. Since I am a moderator here my action is entirely appropriate.

It has happened to me in many forums.
Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.

Some authoritative person needs to exert their authority.
Only when needed. That’s my job.

Even though the forums are for discussion, this authoritative person feels they are god.
This is for religious debate not your personal non-religious soapbox. And as an atheist, don’t worry I have no pretensions regarding gods.

They know exactly what is correct and what is not in the scientific world. Since they are god, they allow only what they feel is correct.
But this is the RELIGION forum and I guess here I am God, or at least one of two gods.

It is called censorship.
No it is called appropriate moderation and redirection to a more appropriate arena.

It is called stopping an alternative opinion based on nothing more than your desire to be right.
No, nothing is being deleted and you can continue your discussion in a different forum if you wish.

I am leaving what I wrote because I wrote it and believed it. I hope that if you have a different opinion, you can see that it is better to leave the door open and continue the discussion than to slam the door shut.
It has no relevance to religion so this is not the correct forum.
 
Moderator comment.

Thread moved from RELIGION to "Science and Society". Thread had zero essential religious content.

Cris
 
Cris said:
Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.
The truth hurts, ouch!

but then you say, "But this is the RELIGION forum and I guess here I am God, or at least one of two gods."

I think it is strange when people extrapolate in silly ways - from mod to God is a big step.
 
i disagree with the thread move.
the first part (up to about page 18 or so) does deal with religion
it is the second part that should have been moved.
maybe the mods don't have the capability to split threads like that and they should if they don't.

cole
take it easy on the mods. cris could have deleted this thread instead.
 
if this thread had been deleted, I don't think future generations would have been impoverished by the act.

I have just been here hoping it would take a turn for the better.
I did appreciate Godless' attempt at playing along, what perseverance, keep on, we may only have to sift through five or six pages of tripe to get another hint of what happeh considers evidence.
 
(Thinking of how this thread progresses ... makes me think of masturbation ... mental ... character masturbation ...)
 
(Thinking of how this thread progresses ... makes me think of masturbation ... mental ... character masturbation ...)

Yup! that was funny! happeh pumping his brain full of ego, soon he will spill the beans!. ;)

The meat we are wainting for is that he knows what he knows by experience!. He's blind in one eye, got problems with his limbs, and has turned gay from massive masturbation syndrome. :D

Godless
 
cole grey said:
the guy has a grey hair.
he is guarded towards his right side.
his face is not symmetrical (few people's are).

I think what you are saying is, switch hands and everything is fine.

What do you mean guarded towards his right side? I do not understand "guarded".
 
Cris said:
Happeh,

I don’t know, how many? You mean the whole world says and agree on one thing and they are all wrong and you are right, right? Don’t be daft.

I am not daft. I am right, they are wrong.

Cris said:
BS. Their position is entirely credible whereas yours is not.

What you mean is that they agree with what you believe. I do not agree with what you believe.

Cris said:
Based on my own life experiences they are entirely consistent. From that I see no reason to believe anything to the contrary.

So you took it on faith. But all the scientists here tell me faith does not belong in science. That is hypocrisy. Faith in a published science study is fine, but faith in a personal belief is total baloney?

Cris said:
Credibility – you have none, they do.

Exactly like I said. You believe in authority because they are authority. Not because you know for a fact in your heart that they are right.

Cris said:
The scientific method is a proven best method. Can you demonstrate anything better?

Much better. Telepathy. Possession.

Cris said:
It is irrelevant what you think you know or what you actually know. If you want to convince others then you have no choice but to use the accepted and proven scientific system for presenting potential new knowledge.

Sure I have another choice. I can expose them to another way of learning that is better for them as human beings. A way of learning that is not designed to separate people into the elite scientists and the rabble of everyone else.

Cris said:
You have not demonstrated that you are open to working with anyone else especially if they are in the least bit skeptical. Your attitude appears inconsistent with cooperative investigation.

That is false. If I wanted to, i could go back thru the last 10 pages and pull quotes where I asked people to look at videos and pictures. Your accusation applies to the forums members, who, just a second ago, you claimed you knew well. All of those forum members refused to cooperate with me.

Are we reading the same thread?

Cris said:
No. I have suggested you have this discussion in a more appropriate forum. This is the RELIGION forum and your topic has nothing to do with religion. Since I am a moderator here my action is entirely appropriate.

Ya. We are reading different threads. This is not my thread. Someone else started it here. I dropped in because it was here. It is not my thread nor my topic.

Cris said:
Perhaps you should take that as a hint that your approach is not working.

Sure. Why don't I just quit and lay down and die? No, that way of life is for you not me.

The evidence that what I say is true comes in your next action. You quit the discussion, then move the entire thread elsewhere. You are a quitter. When the going gets tough, Cris moves the problem over on to someone else's shoulders.

I hope you get stronger in the future. Life is more exciting and rewarding when you confront a problem instead of running away or hiding from it.
 
leopold99 said:
seeing as you have evaded tis question twice
lets see if you evade it again

I am ignoring you leopold. After I saw you say "I want to cum in their mouth" over in another thread, I was so appalled I vowed to never get near you again.
 
Happeh said:
I am ignoring you leopold. After I saw you say "I want to cum in their mouth" over in another thread, I was so appalled I vowed to never get near you again.
of course you are
and it isn't for what you said.
after i made that comment you refered to, you asked if i would sign a release for you to put my picture in your book so don't use that as a moronic excuse happeh. you just can't figure it out can you.
 
Jeesus. All the naysayers and two people have the courage to step forward and give an opinion? Are scientists all cowards? They must protect their reputation so they refuse to take any chances that might lower that reputation?

I am going to wait until tonight and see if the more intelligent people will respond. If this is all the cooperation that I am going to get, I could go try to teach my dogs for all the good it will do.

Let me share something with you. In any group of people, there are real people and there are dogs. Real people want to learn. Dogs want attention. They are not smart, so they get attention by causing trouble.

In human relationships, a person will step forward and say "I have something to teach". A group of people will gather. Some will be people, some will be dogs. The instructor must tame the dogs or get rid of them. They are a distraction and an impediment to teaching the other people. If the instructor does not get rid of or tame the dogs, it is all over.

What happens is the people will get sick of the dogs antics. The dogs interfere with the learning process, and their behavior makes people sick. The people look to the instructor to do something about the dogs. If the instructor does nothing, the people will leave. The dogs make them sick, the instructor won't stop it, the people leave because they have no other choice.

That leaves the instructor with nothing but dogs to teach. Because they are dogs, they can't or don't want to learn. Now the instructor has nothing. He has knowledge, but no people to give it to. Just a pack of howling dogs circling him.

I can't get rid of the dogs. This is not my forums. I cannot get rid of the people constantly calling names or slinging hate and derision. What I see happening is the intelligent people either drifting off, or refusing to participate, because what they see is a conversation full of dogs howling.

Please. If you have nothing to say, go away. If you wish to participate, please participate. If you are a dog, go find a bone somewhere else. If you are an intelligent person, do not let animals dictate your behavior. Stick around and talk. All you have to do is scroll past their posts if they annoy you.
 
leopold99 said:
of course you are
and it isn't for what you said.
after i made that comment you refered to, you asked if i would sign a release for you to put my picture in your book so don't use that as a moronic excuse happeh. you just can't figure it out can you.

You are right. I cannot figure it out.
 
Happeh said:
You are right. I cannot figure it out.
let me expain happeh
you take one picture of a known masturbater
you mix it in with 20 others that are not
you pick the masturbater out of them

you do the above consistintly under verifiable conditions then i will believe you
concerning your request for help i will refrain from being sarcastic.

edit
about my "cum in their mouth"
if the same thing hapened to you that happened to odin i would say the same thing.
 
Last edited:
What I see happening is the intelligent people either drifting off, or refusing to participate, because what they see is a conversation full of dogs howling.

They see a single dog howling at a passing caravan, but the caravan continues nonetheless.

If you have nothing to say, go away.

Then why don't YOU go away?
 
Because people told me they were scientists. They told me they were willing to cooperate. They asked for evidence. I posted a picture. I am waiting for the scientists to demonstrate the cooperation they said they were willing to extend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top