Masturbation is for Losers

[leopold]

That is an incorrect view of the human body. That is what I mean when I say that western doctors and scientists are incompetents.



I will tell you the same thing I told snakelord. I don't prove things with documents signed by your gods. I lead people to see what I do. I teach them to see what I do. I don't want you to believe me. I want you to believe your own two eyes.

okay i see your point. this is a religion thread not science.
western doctors? that sounds racist to me. are you biased toward them? how so?
believe you? i am a skeptic, i don't believe leopold99 is my screen name
my own eyes? well my own eyes tells me that you are in the right thread okay?

edit
how about posting a retraction of your statement "masturbation causes blindness"

 

[SnakeLord]

Becuase you are being obtuse. You are purposefully, for someone who is smart enough to be a doctor, refusing to acknowledge that a series of photos can be examined for various phenomenon.

Not at all. What I am doing is stating quite clearly that in this instance you cannot use a photo of a blind man and consider it evidence that he has been masturbating too much. If you think you can, you're a halfwit. Nothing more need be said.

A catalog of those phenomenon could then be made.

It does not matter how many you have. A million photographs of blind gay people does not in any way provide evidence for them being people that have masturbated their way into blindness and homosexuality.

It is called science. But for some reason, you act as if it is the most bizarre thing you have ever heard.

Clearly you would not know what science is if it got up and slapped you in the head.

If you are so stubborn as to refuse to agree that pictures of ailments cannot be used to make various judgements, then there is nothing further to talk about.

This has nothing to do with being stubborn, but being sane. However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt for now and allow you to explain to me how a picture of a homosexual man suffering from blindness and several lost limbs is evidence that he has been masturbating too much, and that his 'ailments' are a result of masturbating.

I wonder. If someone comes to you with a picture of a person with 3rd degree burns, do you tell them that the picture proves nothing, that you must see the person in real life?

No, but if you see any relevance between the two then you're beyond anyone's help.

I cannot in any way actually believe you believe the shit that's coming out of your mouth. Infact you have thoroughly convinced me that it's actually April 1st. Either that or you're some old forum member on a wind up. It's so daft there's no way you're being serious.

It's like saying masturbation makes you turn black and then classing a photo of an African as proof of your claim. It is literally absurd, and I simply refuse to believe anyone can be that utterly stupid.

Nope. There is no point.

Of course there's a point. But it is obvious to everyone here that you simply cannot produce any evidence for your childish and ignorant claims and so try to dismiss it as everyone elses fault. I find it tragic and pathetic.

If it is not governement signed and stamped, you refuse to believe it.

If what is not signed and stamped? If you mean evidence, I can tell you it doesn't have to be signed or stamped, but it does have to exist. Right now you can show no existing evidence - but seem intent on making everyone believe you simply because you say so.

People like you let Tony Blair bomb Iraq.

As with everything you've said thus far, you're wrong. However, I fail to see it's relevance. It seems nothing more than a tactic on your part to avoid the actual topic.

This is foolishness. This is like saying that a picture of a person with dark charcoal marks on the skin with livid red flesh underneath is not evidence a person has been burned. I really cannot conceive how you can make such a statement.

See earlier repsonse.

You are twisting words.

No I'm not. Let me show you something, some evidence if you will, that will go to show you have problems reading and understanding:

When I say "I cannot verify it"

You didn't say "I cannot verify it", you said: "There is no way that you can verify what I say is masturbation caused damage".

Please, use whatever intelligence you can find, and figure it out.

I am speaking of the government signed affidavit approving your right to think that you so desperately need.

More nonsense. At no time back then had you even started talking your government garbage. Besides which, when you actually understand your own sentence you'll see that this isn't possible.

Admittedly I have met some annoying people on this forum, and some that I just generally dislike. You however win the prize for lowest level of intelligence. Seemingly there isn't a working brain cell in that head of yours.

The vagina completely encircles the penis and exerts a relatively even pressure on the surface of the penis. The hand usually does not completely encircle the penis, and applies uneven pressure to the surface of the penis because of the strength differences between the various fingers

So, blindness, gayness and loss of limbs are not caused directly by masturbation, but because of uneven pressure? Is that to say that if people developed a 'fake fanny' or evenly pressured fake hand that less people would suffer from blindness, lose limbs or turn gay?

As another question, can any man even avoid going blind, losing his limbs and turning gay? After all, when a man takes a pee he still holds his penis, and as such even then there would be uneven pressure applied to it because of strength differences in the fingers etc. Or perhaps when you're in the bath washing your willy. Does that contribute to gayness and blindness aswell? After all, most people will wash their willy - which results in uneven pressure etc etc.

Can we now ammend your "theory" to say:

"any touching of the penis can cause a man to turn blind, turn gay and lose his limbs. To save yourself ensure you never wank, wash or urinate"?

You out of hand reject evidence that science uses all the time to reach conclusions.

Where? You haven't provided any yet.

If a person is murdered, the police take pictures of all aspects of the crime.

Sure, but if they found a photo of a blind man they wouldn't instantly call him a wanker.

Once again:

"You are an incompetent, nothing more. Far too much ego, not enough education."

 

[leopold]

if what happeh said was true i would be blind 50 times.
damn happeh, what do you say about that?

edit
let me guess, it's a sin, the devil, satan re-incarnate
happeh, your type of personality gives religion a bad name.
nobody has told you not to pray to god have they?
that isn't the problem. read your posts man

 

[Silas]

Sorry I'm so late to this guys, considering I am absolutely the Championship wanker on here.

From page 1 (sorry!)

And the next time I have sex, it's going to be "God sex", which is what I like to call the kind of sex that God would want for me to have. And from what I know of God, man, it's gonna be soooooooo good!!!!! Now that's exciting!

"From what I know of God..." What about what you know about the generations of women who had nothing but what you call "God sex" - having waited for one man, and only having relations with him - and spend their entire lives without ever experiencing orgasm? I urge you to read Nancy Friday's Women On Top, whence you will discover that every woman described therein was deprived of sexual satisfaction having been trained up so to do by their mothers, themselves so trained by the much greater repression due solely to Christianity in one form or another that was prevalent only a couple of generations ago.

Promiscuity is a bad thing. I myself don't believe that civilisation has been advanced by the enormous permissiveness on sexual activity over the last forty years. But ignorance and repression of all sexual feelings can be just as bad.

You, however, seem to be verging on the slightly hypocritical. You had been celibate (as I am) for a very long time, and only masturbated occasionally. The tension built up and then two minutes later you were laughing at yourself for being so silly. But you'd done the deed then. Yes, it's not a serious thing. You didn't become a total addict, and you haven't stopped looking for Mr Right (I take it). So what exactly was the problem?

If you really thought it was such a major sin, why were you laughing? If it's so not serious that you were laughing and saying how silly you'd been (or how undignified you looked while doing it - I feel exactly the same way), why are you here laying down the law on everybody else's private behaviour?

 

[Happeh]

okay i see your point. this is a religion thread not science.
western doctors? that sounds racist to me. are you biased toward them? how so?

Did you know people are crazy? It is from Israeli World Domination. They own the USA and British media. They use this control to put things on TV to change people from humans to animals. You for instance. You talk like a news guy from FOX news. The ones that scream at people with opposing viewpoints. You think that a discussion is what you see on FOX or some other Zionist station. If someone disagrees with you, scream at them as loud as you can, then call them names.

I don't blame you. That is the role models you see on TV and emulate. I wish you were more aware. I hate to see human beings turned into cattle.

Why would what I said be racist in the eyes of anyone except for a person who is looking for something to scream about?

how about posting a retraction of your statement "masturbation causes blindness"

Nope. Did you ever get around to saying "I accept the penis is connected to the heart"? No you didn't. You said it was connected only thru the endocrine system.

That is the end of the discussion. You have a false and inaccurate view of the body. You don't want to hear what I have to say. How can we continue the conversation?

 

[Happeh]

Not at all. What I am doing is stating quite clearly that in this instance you cannot use a photo of a blind man and consider it evidence that he has been masturbating too much. If you think you can, you're a halfwit. Nothing more need be said.

Talking to you is a waste of time. Let's just cut to the stuff you like.

No I am not a halfwit. You are a halfwit.

It does not matter how many you have. A million photographs of blind gay people does not in any way provide evidence for them being people that have masturbated their way into blindness and homosexuality.

You are a fool. With attitudes like that, your doctors license should be revoked. You have a close mind and a mean personality.

Clearly you would not know what science is if it got up and slapped you in the head.

I know that people use photos in order to reach conclusions all the time. Police, military, all kinds of people. But according to the God like Snakelord, those people are all fools and only Snakelord knows what is right.

This has nothing to do with being stubborn, but being sane.

Keep saying that. The lemmings will follow you. You know that of course. That is why you talk the way you do. You know the lemmings will follow you and adulate you for nothing more than sounding confident. Just like you sound confident to patients, when you really have no clue what is wrong with them. Just more lies from you. "Sure I know what your ailment is. Just in case (Code for "I don't have a clue what is wrong with you) we need to send you in for testing. For 10,000 dollars"

Why not tell everyone how they have a doctors class specifically teaching you guys how to project false sincerity so that the patients remain calm? Then you pervert that training for your own hate ridden goals.

However, I will give you the benefit of the doubt for now and allow you to explain to me how a picture of a homosexual man suffering from blindness and several lost limbs is evidence that he has been masturbating too much, and that his 'ailments' are a result of masturbating.

See what I mean about "power training"? Language is everything. Snakelord is "going to allow me". The language structure makes him out to be a God I am trying to please.

I am still being polite. You look at the pictures until you agree that, yes, they all seem to have the same symptoms. Once you agree on the symptoms, I tell you it is masturbation damage, or one of several other causes. Once you finish complaining and we begin to look at more photos, I then train you to see the connections between what you observed in the eyes, and what it is about the body that shows the eye problems are masturbation induced.

No, but if you see any relevance between the two then you're beyond anyone's help.

I cannot in any way actually believe you believe the shit that's coming out of your mouth. Infact you have thoroughly convinced me that it's actually April 1st. Either that or you're some old forum member on a wind up. It's so daft there's no way you're being serious.

It's like saying masturbation makes you turn black and then classing a photo of an African as proof of your claim. It is literally absurd, and I simply refuse to believe anyone can be that utterly stupid.

You are hopeless. You are being purposefully obtuse and troublesome. This is a dominance and submission game to you. You think you are in a duel with a fellow doctor or beauracrat for dominance at the hospital. You can't let your guard down for a moment and be a real human being, because then one of the other people like you at the hospital will jump ahead of you and get the promotion or raise that you are trying to dominate people for.

I said it before, I say it again. I am about information transfer. I could care less about your petty power plays.

Of course there's a point. But it is obvious to everyone here that you simply cannot produce any evidence for your childish and ignorant claims and so try to dismiss it as everyone elses fault. I find it tragic and pathetic.

What is obvious to anyone is that you are impossible. You are a bully and you refuse to accept even the most common and obvious ideas in order to further a conversation. It is your way, or the highway.

No I'm not. Let me show you something, some evidence if you will, that will go to show you have problems reading and understanding:

You didn't say "I cannot verify it", you said: "There is no way that you can verify what I say is masturbation caused damage".

Please, use whatever intelligence you can find, and figure it out.

Sorry. You want to twist my words to say some weird twisted stuff, you do the twisting. I am not a lemming that you order around everyday. I don't have to provide you with anything. I am speaking to you as a kindness to a stranger.

Admittedly I have met some annoying people on this forum, and some that I just generally dislike. You however win the prize for lowest level of intelligence. Seemingly there isn't a working brain cell in that head of yours.

I will give you a prize. You are one of the most evil and hurtful people I have met on the internet. You are in the top 5. Your ability to try and kill is breathtaking for a person who claims to be in the health profession. I honestly believe your license should be stripped. Someone that hates the way you do should not be allowed anywhere near trusting and hurting patients.

So, blindness, gayness and loss of limbs are not caused directly by masturbation, but because of uneven pressure? Is that to say that if people developed a 'fake fanny' or evenly pressured fake hand that less people would suffer from blindness, lose limbs or turn gay?

It is my personal belief that this is true. I can recommend a "fake hand" to people for use to avoid this situation. You are one of those people that pounces on one word of a sentence. There are some other factors involved but I will agree with you as far as your question went.

As another question, can any man even avoid going blind, losing his limbs and turning gay? After all, when a man takes a pee he still holds his penis, and as such even then there would be uneven pressure applied to it because of strength differences in the fingers etc. Or perhaps when you're in the bath washing your willy. Does that contribute to gayness and blindness aswell? After all, most people will wash their willy - which results in uneven pressure etc etc.

Remember about Karma? How I told you Karma helps me out? I have a video clip from a movie that I watched 4 days ago. I kept it for personal interest. The video clip sheds some light on your question. As you do not trust me and refuse to click on links I provide, there is no sense in providing the video to you. Then you would say it proves nothing. And you would be right. It proves nothing. What it does do is provoke an intelligent persons imagination in a way that would lead many people to answer the question you pose.

Can we now ammend your "theory" to say:

"any touching of the penis can cause a man to turn blind, turn gay and lose his limbs. To save yourself ensure you never wank, wash or urinate"?

No. We both know this is silly. In order to masturbate, the penis must be erect. The penis can be flaccid during urination.

Where? You haven't provided any yet.

I am speaking of photos. Say photos of a new galaxy used by astronomers who then GUESS at what they are seeing. All a normal, accepted part of science. Guessing at the cause for a phenomenon until the actual reason is discovered. Jeez. I am describing the scientific process to a doctor the way it is described to 1st graders in science class.

Sure, but if they found a photo of a blind man they wouldn't instantly call him a wanker.

Once again:

"You are an incompetent, nothing more. Far too much ego, not enough education."

What you mean is that my example of forensic photo examination is right on. Using your training on how to dominate patients, you know that in a fight you can't win, you run away. But before running away, you are trained to declare victory in that confident way you have also been trained to project.

I seen this same method used all over the internet. You do know that if you got training in domination of other people, that there are thousands others just like you? People who have been trained in a classroom setting on what it takes to make other people lie down like dogs and obey you.

Many people in marketing for instance, are trained to project confidence and tell lies just like you. That is how they sell things. Marketing is just a fancy name for Used Car Salesman. The course could be labled, "How to dominate and control people so you can sell them junk cars for big bucks".

 

[Happeh]

if what happeh said was true i would be blind 50 times.
damn happeh, what do you say about that?

How do you know you are not blind? If you are blind, you can't see what it is you cannot see. You would never know you are blind.

You have never asked how long it takes for blindness to set it. You have never asked how much masturbation it takes to cause the damage. Maybe you haven't reached that particular point yet.

let me guess, it's a sin, the devil, satan re-incarnate
happeh, your type of personality gives religion a bad name.
nobody has told you not to pray to god have they?
that isn't the problem. read your posts man

There you go talking about how I am religious. I never said I was a bible thumper.

 

[SnakeLord]

You are a fool. With attitudes like that, your doctors license should be revoked.

What attitude? Me telling you that a photo of a blind man cannot be considered as evidence that he went blind through masturbation? That is cause for my license to be revoked? Amusing but also a tad naive.

You have a close mind and a mean personality.

I can be mean, certainly - but my mind is open, (but does ask for evidence when people make fantastical claims).

But according to the God like Snakelord, those people are all fools and only Snakelord knows what is right.

Another display of your lack of English comprehension?

Keep saying that. The lemmings will follow you. You know that of course. That is why you talk the way you do.

Is it true to state that anyone that ever agrees with anyone else becomes instantly classifiable as a lemming? It's weird, but I'm sure if people agreed with you you'd be the very last person to call them 'lemmings', but because they disagree, (on the basis that you have no evidence whatsoever), you dismiss them all as arse lickers. Of course judging from the sputum that you talk, you've probably never had anyone agree with you and as such are merely jealous of those that have.

"Sure I know what your ailment is. Just in case (Code for "I don't have a clue what is wrong with you) we need to send you in for testing. For 10,000 dollars"

Not really how it works, but it was an interesting story nonetheless.

Why not tell everyone how they have a doctors class specifically teaching you guys how to project false sincerity so that the patients remain calm?

They do?

You look at the pictures until you agree that, yes, they all seem to have the same symptoms.

You only provided a link to one picture. As a result I fail to see why you've said "they all". That aside, having now looked at it I'm not exactly sure what you want from me.

John Spencer was a good actor, but I wouldn't know or suggest that he spent a lot of his time masturbating, or that his death was a result of it. What now?

Once you agree on the symptoms, I tell you it is masturbation damage

He died of a heart attack. It happens to many people, (women included that do not have a penis to apply uneven pressure on). The article also states he was a recovering alcoholic. It is prevalent to state that the alcohol played a larger part in his death than any masturbating he might have done - unless you have evidence to the contrary.

or one of several other causes

So.. not masturbation? I guess not - because although he died, he wasn't blind in one eye and had all his limbs intact.

I then train you to see the connections between what you observed in the eyes, and what it is about the body that shows the eye problems are masturbation induced.

Go on then Mr. Trainer, next pic.

You are being purposefully obtuse and troublesome. This is a dominance and submission game to you.

'Fraid not. It's honesty at it's most honest.

You think you are in a duel with a fellow doctor or beauracrat for dominance at the hospital.

Actually it's more like arguing with a pubic louse.

What is obvious to anyone is that you are impossible.

You'll find I'll be less impossible if you provide some evidence.

You are a bully and you refuse to accept even the most common and obvious ideas in order to further a conversation.

Sorry, what is a "common" and "obvious" idea?

I will give you a prize. You are one of the most evil and hurtful people I have met on the internet.

Do I get a trophy?

I honestly believe your license should be stripped.

Yeah, but you also believe masturbation makes people turn gay. There you have it.

I can recommend a "fake hand" to people for use to avoid this situation.

Lol, I bet you can..

Then you would say it proves nothing. And you would be right. It proves nothing.

Then there would be absolutely no point in showing it to me.

What it does do is provoke an intelligent persons imagination

Imagination is not needed. What is needed is evidence.

No. We both know this is silly. In order to masturbate, the penis must be erect. The penis can be flaccid during urination.

Erect or not, there would be uneven pressure placed upon it whenever held - thus causing the same problems.

I am speaking of photos. Say photos of a new galaxy used by astronomers who then GUESS at what they are seeing.

I notice you keep struggling to understand such a very simple point. People take photos all day long, everyday.. but you cannot use a photo of a blind man, (etc), and claim it's because he wanks too much.

 

[leopold]

this thread has produced 2 people that will directly invalidate happeh's claims.
happeh has not produce any verifiiable evidence to support his views.

happeh you are racist when you say "western doctors"
there is no difference between a western,northern,southern or eastern doctor.
on the other hand doctor is not the same as shaman
keep your vile racist remarks to yourself

you asked if i know people are crazy, let me guess masturbation right?
if you got information/evidence then share it

oh by the way can you admit that you have masturbated?
you do not need to retract your statement me and silas has aready invalidated your claims

 

[(Q)]

Why? Because they hate for the truth to get out? From the comments here, people seem to think I am making this up.

Most likely you are making it up. Provide the evidence. I doubt you will.

Scientific studies accepted for decades as reality, then, poof!, someone decides it was all a mistake and something else is what reality is about.

Are you referring to concepts like the flat earth or the sun revolving around the earth? If not, what then exactly? Are these more vacuous claims?

Why clearly? I have posted one scientific study about erectile dysfunction and heart attack, and one picture of a man.

And that is supposed to be overwhelming evidence in favor of Happeh theory?

It is only in your head that it is false.

And everyone else of course. It is only you who thinks your assertions are valid.

 

[Happeh]

You only provided a link to one picture. As a result I fail to see why you've said "they all". That aside, having now looked at it I'm not exactly sure what you want from me.

And the minute I did, you started yapping about how pictures did not please God Snakelord. I mean jeez. What does it take to get thru to you. Your name even has the word "lord" in it. If that is not a psychological insight into how you view yourself, I don't know what is.

John Spencer was a good actor, but I wouldn't know or suggest that he spent a lot of his time masturbating, or that his death was a result of it. What now?

In the post that I made with the picture, I asked anyone interested to describe what they saw. The state of the man's health. Any oddities they noticed, etc. The point is to see how observant they are. If they look at the picture and say "I don't see anything. I see a guy's head", my life is hell. If they look and say "I see this and that", maybe there is hope I can get thru to the person.

He died of a heart attack. It happens to many people, (women included that do not have a penis to apply uneven pressure on). The article also states he was a recovering alcoholic. It is prevalent to state that the alcohol played a larger part in his death than any masturbating he might have done - unless you have evidence to the contrary.

Yes he did die of heart attack. And the study I posted said Erectile Dysfunction and Heart Attack are related. Can you see the process I am following? ED and HA are related. That man died of a heart attack. The next step is to examine the man for signs of masturbation damage. The process is just like examining a patient to see if they have a cold. Step by step connect the symptoms until you arrive at a diagnosis.

So.. not masturbation? I guess not - because although he died, he wasn't blind in one eye and had all his limbs intact.

Here is where the problems begin. You say he is not blind in one eye. To me, that says you are an unobservant person. You do not have the skills to observe a person and make an accurate judgement on what you see. I agree that we cannot look at him and say he is blind without pointing at what it is that makes us think he might be blind, But we can look at him and remark about the general appearance of his head, face and eyes.

I also want to correct something. You keep saying "limbs intact" as if they will be amputated or something. That is not the case. The limbs can take on the same aspect as a person who has a stroke. The hand likes to stay up close to the chest and the leg shuffles just like a stroke victim. Don't stroke victims go blind sometimes? You should be able to verify that. If we could talk about this, we could discuss if the same mechanism within the body accounts for both maladies. After all, both sufferers exhibit similar symptoms. Maybe it is the same cause also.

Go on then Mr. Trainer, next pic.

You have no patience. We are not finished with this picture. You indicated you saw nothing wrong with the man in the picture. I think you are unobservant. To prove this, I would ask you to describe the state of both eyes of the man. Then I would like you to describe the coloration of his face. I would like you to describe the look his face has on it. I would like you to give a description of his general body state.

See? You say there is nothing in the picture. I just wrote down 4 questions that need answering. I think it is obvious you did not look, or you don't know how to look.

You'll find I'll be less impossible if you provide some evidence.

As soon as we force you to admit that you are either hasty and did not give an opinion of the man in the picture, or you admit that when you look at the picture, you see nothing. If that is the case, you need to be trained to observe and catalog your observations before any more pictures will be of any use.

Lol, I bet you can..

Once you realize I am not jokiing, you will find that I have thought all of this thru thoroughly. I know exactly what I am talking about. Everything I say makes sense according to my theory. I know what will ameliorate the symptoms based on what my theory says is the cause of the problem. It is all very logical and rational.

Imagination is not needed. What is needed is evidence.

No. What is needed is imagination. Before Einsteins laws of motion, what did physics say about motion? Nothing really. Everyone knew that an apple fell from a tree. But there was no physical law proving it.

In my opinion, what you are doing is equivalent to saying it does not matter if we all see an apple fall from a tree. Until Einstein writes up his paper and signs it, proving mathematically that apples fall to the ground because of gravity, what we see with our own eyes is nothing but imagination.

That is silly. You know it is silly. I know it is silly. Everyone knows it is silly. What we see with our eyes is real. Someone has to be the first person just like Einstein was to make the law or be the expert. Maybe I will be the person to be the expert on this subject. If I am, we both know there is no expert to say I am right. There was no expert to verify Einstein until after Einstein wrote it all down on paper and gave it to other people to check. I am here with my theory looking for other people to check it.

Erect or not, there would be uneven pressure placed upon it whenever held - thus causing the same problems.

Stop being tricky. The first half of the sentence up to the hyphen I can agree with. But I do not agree with the second half. The application of uneven pressure to a flaccid penis is not the same as the application of pressure to an erect penis. If you are a doctor, you should have had some physics in college. You should know that a hard and soft object will react differently according to the laws of physics. Not just because I say so.

I notice you keep struggling to understand such a very simple point. People take photos all day long, everyday.. but you cannot use a photo of a blind man, (etc), and claim it's because he wanks too much.

But we can use it as a stepping stone. Once you agree he is blind, or vision impaired, I can try to get you to see the other bodily symptoms that indicate the blindness was caused by masturbation.

 

[Happeh]

this thread has produced 2 people that will directly invalidate happeh's claims.
happeh has not produce any verifiiable evidence to support his views.

happeh you are racist when you say "western doctors"
there is no difference between a western,northern,southern or eastern doctor.
on the other hand doctor is not the same as shaman
keep your vile racist remarks to yourself

You are simple, aren't you Leopold? I am telling you that you are going of to some weird place that is only going to make you foolish. I will stand here and let you talk, digging yourself deeper and deeper. Then I will say what is going on and you will look foolish. I am warning you because I hate to see people make fools of themselves. But if that is what you need, I will do it for you. I like to help people.

you asked if i know people are crazy, let me guess masturbation right?
if you got information/evidence then share it

Excessive masturbation will induce mental problems. One of the usual mental problems is the need to hurt others. The masturbation inhibits the man's ability to feel. He needs to hurt others so that they scream. Those people can feel screaming or agony, even with their inhibited feelings.

In fact, just to poke snakelord, because I know he will say it is balderdash, that is the reason early human cultures sacrificed people. Sacrificing the people releases their energy for the priests or the multitude to feed on. The way a vampire feeds on peoples energy.

Go snakelord! Go!

 

[Happeh]

Why? Because they hate for the truth to get out? From the comments here, people seem to think I am making this up.

Most likely you are making it up. Provide the evidence. I doubt you will.

If you stay with this, I promise you that I will dump loads of corroborating evidence on you. Note the distincition. I said corroborating to ensure you know that it is not a scientific study or any other expert. It is pictures of people who all exhibit the same physical symptoms. It is a unique view of the body that most people have not heard of. It is explanations of how the body truly functions instead of the mistakes or half explanations given by modern medicine.

Scientific studies accepted for decades as reality, then, poof!, someone decides it was all a mistake and something else is what reality is about.

Are you referring to concepts like the flat earth or the sun revolving around the earth? If not, what then exactly? Are these more vacuous claims?

I am referring to things like Thalidomide or Serozat. Thalidomide was prescribed to women. Then they had deformed babies. Oops! Serozat is an anti depressant I believe. Turns out, it seems to cause suicide in some people. If you really want to know, I can post the articles for you to read. Vioxx is a pain reliever. Oops! Vioxx really causes heart attacks. But Merck paid bribes to scientists to say it was OK.

Why clearly? I have posted one scientific study about erectile dysfunction and heart attack, and one picture of a man.

And that is supposed to be overwhelming evidence in favor of Happeh theory?

No. No one is cooperating. I asked people for their opinion of the man in the picture. No one said anything. They said who he was. They said what he died from. No one said what he looked like. Or their feelings from looking at the picture. Until I get some acknowledgement or cooperation, there is no point in providing more evidence.

It is only in your head that it is false.

And everyone else of course. It is only you who thinks your assertions are valid.

For now. Galileo and Copernicus had the same problems. All trailblazers do.

( I said that last because I know Leopold will go ballistic if I claim I am some kind of special guy. )

 

[Godless]

I am warning you because I hate to see people make fools of themselves.

Been looking at yourself in the mirror lately?.

You are an idiot, and every fucking post you make further points it out. You have no credentials. NOT A DOCTOR. Just an idiot making false claims farting out of his mouth.

I read the link. Very interesting stuff. Thanks! However it did not mention anything there even remotely that masterbation causes erectile dysfunction.

Godless

 

[leopold]

Note the distincition. I said corroborating to ensure you know that it is not a scientific study or any other expert. It is pictures of people who all exhibit the same physical symptoms.

like i said before you are in the right thread. no science here

you never answered the question "do you masturbate"

another question for you
how do you feel about homosexuals?
would you put your arms around them and say "i love you"?
would you sleep in the same bed with one?

 

[James R]

So, in essence, you are admitting that there is no scientific evidence that excessive masterbation is harmful in any way. Is that correct?

Not directly, no.

Ok, that seems to clear up most of your issues in this thread. You admit that excessive masterbation is not directly harmful.

That only leaves you free to claim it is in some way indirectly harmful. Is that what you're claiming?

 

[SnakeLord]

Your name even has the word "lord" in it. If that is not a psychological insight into how you view yourself, I don't know what is.

A common misconception made by the more religious people on this forum, (not saying you're religious). I've actually explained it a few times, and shall do so again now in the hopes of clearing it up:

I was given the nickname Snakeman when I was a young lad because I've always kept pet snakes. Around 5 years ago I started to play an mmorpg, (online role playing game), that is set in the time of knights, mages, dragons and that kind of stuff. As a result of the nature of that game I changed my nick to SnakeLord as I felt it was more appropriate. I've just kinda been stuck with it ever since. I could change it if you want?

Step by step connect the symptoms until you arrive at a diagnosis.

O..k, and what 'symptoms', (visible in that picture), lead you to conclude he was a chronic masturbator and that he died because of it?

You do not have the skills to observe a person and make an accurate judgement on what you see. I agree that we cannot look at him and say he is blind without pointing at what it is that makes us think he might be blind, But we can look at him and remark about the general appearance of his head, face and eyes.

John Spencer had a droopy left eyelid, but it is not an indication of blindness, and nor has it ever been. Stevie Wonder, he's blind - John Spencer wasn't.

Don't stroke victims go blind sometimes? You should be able to verify that. If we could talk about this, we could discuss if the same mechanism within the body accounts for both maladies. After all, both sufferers exhibit similar symptoms. Maybe it is the same cause also.

So now masturbation also causes stroke?

See? You say there is nothing in the picture. I just wrote down 4 questions that need answering. I think it is obvious you did not look, or you don't know how to look.

I did look, but I see no indication that the guy's been masturbating too much.

Once you realize I am not jokiing, you will find that I have thought all of this thru thoroughly. I know exactly what I am talking about. Everything I say makes sense according to my theory. I know what will ameliorate the symptoms based on what my theory says is the cause of the problem.

I'm sorry, but you must be joking. I am fully expecting you to give a big "LOL!" sometime shortly and call us all gullible fools that will argue with any old nitwit.

Once you agree he is blind, or vision impaired, I can try to get you to see the other bodily symptoms that indicate the blindness was caused by masturbation.

Just for the sake of moving on, let's both agree that the man was blind as Stevie Wonder - hell, let's just move on to Stevie Wonder. Now, show me how that is in any way connected to masturbation.

 

[Lori_7]

Hey,

I'm surprised to see this thread still running...cool. Party on, Wayne...


To address the general audience, I have a few things to say....

I didn't mean for the title to my thread to be malicious or judgemental. Lord knows I've wacked off more than the average bear. I never even considered myself...ever....in a position of judgement against another human being for any reason. If I feel inclinded too, it usually doesn't take long for God to humble me. Any time you guys are thinking "she's some hypocritical christian who's judging me"...just remember that I killed my own child, and have partied like a rock star trying to forget it for a decade or so....so...there's not going to be any finger pointing here.

I'm not judging you...ever.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure that you would have to take it out of context not to realize that I'm using my personal experience to testify that God has presented to me, something so much better, that the very ideal of which, made masturbating such a huge disappointment that I was no longer inclined to.. That's what happened to me anyway, and I wanted to share. You can wack off til the end of time, and I'll still love you just as much.

The only reason, I swear, that I started this thread was because I overheard my rock star talking about wanking. Every time he scratches his butt (or whatever), it's recorded and put on the net. So honestly, my response was...

Get off my stuff already!

I love this man no matter what...and his stuff is mine.

You can call it selfish if you like. I just wanted to share what God imparted to me regarding masturbation..to him, and to anyone else who happened to be listening. I'm not judging anybody. I'm a loser in my own ways...plenty.

I mean, this thread was meant for the man I'm in love with...chances are I did not wish to offend. You guys don't understand me. Sometimes I think its my fault and sometimes I think you're not trying to.

Anyway, Merry Christmas everyone...and don't forget that Jesus is the reason for the season. Love ya!

 

[Happeh]

Been looking at yourself in the mirror lately?.

You are an idiot, and every fucking post you make further points it out.

You have trouble making a post without the word "idiot" in it, don't you?

You have no credentials. NOT A DOCTOR.

Nope. I honestly said I had none. Never claimed to be a doctor.

Just an idiot making false claims farting out of his mouth.

Funny. I could say the same about you.

 

[Happeh]

like i said before you are in the right thread. no science here

you never answered the question "do you masturbate"

Do you still beat your wife?

Do you still take drugs?

Do you still steal from the church collection plate?

Weren't you saying you were not gay? Why are you asking me if I masturbate?

another question for you
how do you feel about homosexuals?
would you put your arms around them and say "i love you"?
would you sleep in the same bed with one?

Homosexuals are bad for society. I don't persecute them. I don't like to be around them because most of them are "vampires". They suck energy out of men the same way women suck the energy out of men. No I would not sleep in a bed with one. No I would not put my arms around one and say I love you.

Unless he was dying in bed and I felt sorry for him.