Masturbation is for Losers

[Happeh]

What would you say if I told you that I believe that excessive masturbation is one of the leading contributors to death by "AIDS"?

happeh did you say this?

Yes I did.

 

[Happeh]

post the link again i'll give you an honest opinion

With your line up of post meant to ridicule me, if you really want to look at the picture, find it yourself. After snakelord acted like he would be reasonable, then turned right back to being impossible, I am not in the mood to be tricked anymore.

 

[Mythbuster]

The True Lesson in Life.

 

[Godless]

All detailed in the protocols of zion.

I already pointed out this is hoax bull shit! Like Illuminaties, and several other supposedly secret societies that exist to destroy the world. ONLY an idiot would fall for such garbage!

Why don't you grow a brain and think like an adult?

Keep looking at yourself in the mirror with the prick on hand while making the above statement and it just might work for you.

I want to talk about masturbation for the same reason people talk about drugs or smoking. Anyone is free to do as they please. I want to ensure they have accurate information before they do this.

But all you have shown is an overinflated ego, and produced nilch in EVIDENCE

On the other hand, if some racists who control the media print "Masturbate all you want.

These would be the Jews?. Your the freaking biggot here pulling that shit with the protocols of Zion bull shit!.

Godless

 

[SnakeLord]

If you are going to complain after every post that you haven't seen proof yet, I am going to give up

Forget proof, I'll settle for evidence. That would be a start at least, and would end the 'complaints' on every post. What we have so far is one picture of an actor that doesn't in any way, shape or form point at masturbation turning people blind or gay. You might aswell show me a photo of a man with a broken toe and claim it's because he smokes too much. It's ludicrous, and not something that any sane and rational individual would do.

Might I ask some background details, your age and so on? What do you do for a living? Are your parents religious? Further to that, what made you first think of 'happeh assumption'? Have you ever masturbated? Did you ever get caught masturbating by your parents? Do you have a girlfriend?

How would you feel if your patients told you after every sentence they were sick and needed help.

If you're trying to find some comparison between the two then we're gonna be here a long time - probably because there isn't any. However, similar things to that occur often enough. It's not a particular problem for me. Of course however, I would understand their anger or frustration if I tried to force them to take pills without having any evidence to show that they needed them.

Jeez. Most science papers are 10 or more pages long. Do you complain after each sentence that they have not proved anything? Or do you wait until you have read all 10 pages before you make a judgement?

Tell you what then, provide a 'science paper' on happeh assumption and I'll read it through fully. However, if it has no evidence supporting it you'll get the exact same response you have in this thread. And yes, I would generally dissect it after reading it. With regards to the happeh assumption - you make a claim stating that masturbation causes people to turn blind and gay. I would naturally dissect this into several return questions that must each have some indicating evidence to support them.

One example was my question concerning sex vs masturbation and what the difference is. You answered that it is due to differing pressure placed on the penis. This would then have to be tested with a group of people: You'd have some purely having sex, some purely masturbating, and some masturbating with a fake hand designed to apply even pressure. You will eventually get some data concerning the experiment and can then add that to your science paper. From that point on it's more than an assumption, but still requires vigorous testing.

So far you have provided nothing. You haven't stated the time it takes to suffer from blindness and homosexuality from masturbating, the amount of masturbation needed, whether fast masturbating is more harmful than slow masturbating, etc etc etc yada yada yada. These are all essential if you wish for the happeh assumption to ever go anywhere.

I would strongly advise for now that you literally think of everything you can concerning your assumption and write it in full from start to finish. I guess we can skip over evidence for now, but at least get far enough to actually have your assumption in proper written format with all key ideas included.

What gets to me is that you seem more focused on calling everyone that disagrees with you evil or nasty when you should be more concerned with getting your ideas straightened out. The fact of the matter is that you will always face disagreement and adversity, no matter what you're doing. You can either get all fussy over the way people talk - and thus be guided by your own fragile sensibilities, or realise it doesn't matter because one way or the other you're going to show that happeh assumption has some merit. Alas there is currently no evidence for it, but one step at a time. Get it written down.

I have listened to you say the photo is pointless at least 20 times.

So why you keep trying to ram a photo down my throat instead of moving on to the next piece of evidence is beyond me. No scientist and no rational or sane person will accept one photo of a man with a wonky eyelid as evidence that he's been masturbating too much. While you might, it is everyone else needs that you need to fulfill - because they are the ones examining your ideas. You want science to recognise and accept your assumptions, so you must work to scientific standards.

I have reassured you to have patience and hold on.

You cannot add that in a 'science paper'. If your assumption has not been formulated then tell me, but I was under the impression that you had it all worked out. As such I shouldn't really need patience, I should be able to read it in full right now.

There is no hope for you.

And then there is no hope for 'happeh assumption'. Science is on my side right now, and you want science to regonise and accept what you're saying, but right now you're not even trying. You have spent the majority of your time not discussing your assumption, but much more concerned about nicknames, and styles of speech, and other completely unrelated nonsense that should have no place in this discussion. A strange course of action for someone who apparently wants the world to know his theory. Do you even have the idea written in full?

You demand evidence so you can point at it and say "Balderdash!". Not because you want to examine the evidence and make a judgement on it.

That should not in any way stop you from producing the evidence. There are many other people on this forum, so if I say "balderdash" or not is inconsequential. They're generally a smart bunch of people on here so if they consider the evidence as sufficient and I do not, I'm sure they'll let me know. However, I will also state that you're wrong. I want the evidence so I can see that masturbation really is harmful, and then can take steps to ensure I never turn blind or homosexual.

Fine. Believe what you want.

I take it you disagree? Is there a reason or would you just prefer to limit this to pointless little sentences? So, the questions:

1) Is there a difference between 'normal' masturbation and "cold and rational" masturbation?

2) Are you suggesting that when people masturbate they are doing so "coldly and rationally"?

3) If you state there is a difference between 'normal' masturbation and "cold and rational" masturbation, would you not consider the data flawed if I undertook the experiment the way you told me to?

Sure. You are the expert. Whatever you say.

Again, more poinltess short sentences. Are you able to have a discussion and debate? You are claiming that you are the expert, (indeed telling me several times that you are going to 'teach' me), and as such you surely have a little bit more to say than you have provided here. Kindly show how a facial expression made during masturbation is an indication that you will turn blind and gay.

Video games don't hurt anyone.

I disagree. Personally enjoying games that involve a lot of pvp, (player vs player fights that involve the death of one player), I have seen how much hurt can be caused by them. Obviously not a physical harm, but most certainly mental harm - and that is most often more damaging than physical harm. People break their limbs all the time, and after some brief hospital attention, get over it and move on. With mental harm, the effects can last for years, or perhaps forever.

You don't have the intelligence to even get my respect.

I will accept that claim if you can show some evidence supporting it.

That's right. That is the snake I know. Deceitful. Don't answer the direct question I asked.

A somewhat hypocritical thing to say considering you haven't answered my question at all. What is it's relevance to masturbation?

Completely ignore everything I said and point to something else.

Which is what you are doing right this second. Oh such glaring hypocricy.

I proved you were wrong in your statements about photos being useful, and you ran away and wanted to talk about something else.

Where? Kindly provide the evidence of these two claims:

1) That you 'proved' anything and

2) That I ran away.

No. I am done wasting time on you.

Amusing to note, but you've said something along the same lines several other times that I have asked for evidence, and only when I ask for evidence.

I suggest you start behaving like a grown up. While I cannot demand it of you, you'll find it will all go a lot smoother if you do.

 

[Happeh]

I already pointed out this is hoax bull shit! Like Illuminaties, and several other supposedly secret societies that exist to destroy the world. ONLY an idiot would fall for such garbage!

Keep telling yourself that.

Keep looking at yourself in the mirror with the prick on hand while making the above statement and it just might work for you.

No thanks. I feel slimy just reading your statement.

But all you have shown is an overinflated ego, and produced nilch in EVIDENCE

OK

These would be the Jews?. Your the freaking biggot here pulling that shit with the protocols of Zion bull shit!.

Godless

You really are a one trick pony huh? You should at least learn to spell your power words right. It is B I G O T. One g, not two.

 

[Happeh]

Forget proof, I'll settle for evidence. That would be a start at least, and would end the 'complaints' on every post. What we have so far is one picture of an actor that doesn't in any way, shape or form point at masturbation turning people blind or gay. You might aswell show me a photo of a man with a broken toe and claim it's because he smokes too much. It's ludicrous, and not something that any sane and rational individual would do.

No. Now that you have seen one photo, the idea is to discuss what my theory says about the photo. Once we get that all out of the way, then we start going thru more photos and looking for the same symptoms my theory predicts. Your constant carping for instantaneous proof is childlike.

Might I ask some background details, your age and so on? What do you do for a living? Are your parents religious? Further to that, what made you first think of 'happeh assumption'? Have you ever masturbated? Did you ever get caught masturbating by your parents? Do you have a girlfriend?

No. Once you realize that you cannot attack me or make me back down intellectually, the next step will be personal attack. You cannot attack me personally until you know something personal about me. I don't feel like handing you a weapon to hurt me with.

One example was my question concerning sex vs masturbation and what the difference is. You answered that it is due to differing pressure placed on the penis. This would then have to be tested with a group of people: You'd have some purely having sex, some purely masturbating, and some masturbating with a fake hand designed to apply even pressure. You will eventually get some data concerning the experiment and can then add that to your science paper. From that point on it's more than an assumption, but still requires vigorous testing.

Snakelord. I am a person on the internet speaking to you. I do not have a lab. I do not have a research grant. I do not have millions of dollars. You know that. Why are you saying all that foolishness above?

So far you have provided nothing. You haven't stated the time it takes to suffer from blindness and homosexuality from masturbating,

You never asked. It depends on the frequency and the method of masturbation. I feel save in saying 3 to 5 years for any man. People who masturbate more frequently or in a specific way? The effects can happen in a year. I was talking to some kids that were bragging to each other how they masturbated 8 times in one day. That kind of activity will damage a person within 1 year I believe.

the amount of masturbation needed, whether fast masturbating is more harmful than slow masturbating, etc etc etc yada yada yada. These are all essential if you wish for the happeh assumption to ever go anywhere.

Amazing how once you ask a real question, I provide the answer as I did above. I would think the speed of masturbation would have no effect. I have honestly never given it any thought. I would say off the top of my head that pressure applied by the hand is more important than speed.

I would strongly advise for now that you literally think of everything you can concerning your assumption and write it in full from start to finish. I guess we can skip over evidence for now, but at least get far enough to actually have your assumption in proper written format with all key ideas included.

Snakelord takes charge to do it right! No thanks. If you would talk to me as a person, instead of demanding evidence, you will find that I have thought this through thourougly. As long as you continue to demand proof that only millions of dollars, a gaggle of experts, or a bank load of money can provide, I will never prove anything to you. I have none of those things.

What gets to me is that you seem more focused on calling everyone that disagrees with you evil or nasty when you should be more concerned with getting your ideas straightened out.

Huh? When people are nasty, I tell them. Instead of walking away, I tell them they are nasty to see if they realize they are being hurtful. Some people honestly do not know that other people run away from them because they are mean. As a matter of conscience, I always ask the people or bring up their meanness to see if they are aware of it. Then if they act like they know it and are doing it on purpose, I am justified in leaving.

So why you keep trying to ram a photo down my throat instead of moving on to the next piece of evidence is beyond me.

Very simple. I am not your slave. I told you I will not participate in your dominance games. This is about you forcing me to do what you want. No. You are nobody to me. You are a voice on the internet. You can talk to me in a friendly manner and ask me things and I will do them. If you continue to say "Give it to me NOW", I am never going to give you anything.

No scientist and no rational or sane person will accept one photo of a man with a wonky eyelid as evidence that he's been masturbating too much.

I completely agree. The problem is, you forget to mention that I asked you for an analysis of the photo. When I pointed out the red flush on the man's face and asked you specifically about it, you completely ignored my question. What is the point in showing more photos if you refuse to discuss the first one?

While you might, it is everyone else needs that you need to fulfill - because they are the ones examining your ideas. You want science to recognise and accept your assumptions, so you must work to scientific standards.

I did want that. I still do. I don't expect it to happen. Scientists are too close minded. Every single one acts like you. It is their nature. Their nature is concrete what they can hold in their hand. If someone says something outside of their field of belief, instead of trying to imagine, they simply discard the new ideas. It wasn't in their textbook in school, so it must all be lies.

You cannot add that in a 'science paper'. If your assumption has not been formulated then tell me, but I was under the impression that you had it all worked out. As such I shouldn't really need patience, I should be able to read it in full right now.

If I liked and trusted you, I might think about letting you read it right now. Also, if you did read it, you would go nuts. It is too much in one sitting. Your world view is so narrow that you cannot make the jumps necessary to understand what I say. To you, I am imagining. To me, you are stuck in the mud.

And then there is no hope for 'happeh assumption'.

I must be tired. I never even noticed "happeh assumption" until right now. This is you. You have to fight about everything. Instead of letting "happeh theory" go, as a friendly thing to do as part of the conversation, you MUST rewrite it as "happeh assumption", so that I am diminished.

You are so transparent.

Science is on my side right now, and you want science to regonise and accept what you're saying, but right now you're not even trying.

You need to learn about life. When people like me meet people like you? We run away. Your attitude literally makes people physically sick. If you ever tire of being a doctor, the USA will hire you as a torturer in a minute flat. I believe you could cause someone to die of a heart attack with your flair for verbal negativity.

I am dead serious.

You have spent the majority of your time not discussing your assumption, but much more concerned about nicknames, and styles of speech, and other completely unrelated nonsense that should have no place in this discussion.

What I have spent time doing is playing power games like you wanted. As a friendly person, I recognize you needed to play submission/dominance games. I played for awhile. Now it is getting tedious.

A strange course of action for someone who apparently wants the world to know his theory. Do you even have the idea written in full?

You truly are astounding in your constant put downs. I have written a book. I am writing another one that will be finished this week. I have 2 more books planned.

That should not in any way stop you from producing the evidence. There are many other people on this forum, so if I say "balderdash" or not is inconsequential. They're generally a smart bunch of people on here so if they consider the evidence as sufficient and I do not, I'm sure they'll let me know. However, I will also state that you're wrong. I want the evidence so I can see that masturbation really is harmful, and then can take steps to ensure I never turn blind or homosexual.

That is you. People like you have no feelings. Someone can kick and punch you because you do not feel it thru the solid block of wood that your body is. People like me are open. We feel the emotions and thoughts of others. Your hatred is like an axe cutting me across the forehead with every post of yours I read. And because I want to do what is right, I continue to deal with you, even though those axe blows to the head really hurt.

I take it you disagree? Is there a reason or would you just prefer to limit this to pointless little sentences? So, the questions:

What you mean when you say "limit it to pointless little sentences" is "if you want to keep it to science, questions back and forth about your theory, then how can I enact my submission/dominance game? There is no place to play submission/dominance in a scientific discussion".

1) Is there a difference between 'normal' masturbation and "cold and rational" masturbation?

Sure. Normal, and cold and rational. Different emotional states. Somehow, I think that was not your question. As a scientist, you are supposed to be able to formulate your thoughts in an understandable way.

I will assume you mean "is there any physical difference between the two styles". Not from the emotional states only. I would think that the emotional states would cause changes in the physical state though. A regular person would relax and let the body do what it wants. A cold and rational approach could make the person stiffen up and try to stop the natural reactions to masturbation.

2) Are you suggesting that when people masturbate they are doing so "coldly and rationally"?

No. I have no idea why you are fixating on this. I only said "cold and rational" because I thought it would appeal to your nature.

3) If you state there is a difference between 'normal' masturbation and "cold and rational" masturbation, would you not consider the data flawed if I undertook the experiment the way you told me to?

The difference between the two is inconsequential. I really don't know why you are fixating on this.

Again, more poinltess short sentences. Are you able to have a discussion and debate? You are claiming that you are the expert, (indeed telling me several times that you are going to 'teach' me), and as such you surely have a little bit more to say than you have provided here. Kindly show how a facial expression made during masturbation is an indication that you will turn blind and gay.

I can't because your view of the human body is incomplete. You need to know how the body really works for me to show that. I have my own way of discussing how the body really works. Somehow I don't think you will pay any more attention to that than you will to my theory on masturbation.

I keep telling you this is a complex subject I have fully thought thru. Then you demand an answer in the next post, or I am a liar or wrong. I don't know what to do. You have no patience to work with me.

Where? Kindly provide the evidence of these two claims:

1) That you 'proved' anything and

2) That I ran away.

No. You are a killer. You kill people's spirit. You kill creativity. You kill imagination. You want to drag me down by forcing me to repeat things over and over and over again. You are like a woman in the way you play stupid and forgetful.

I suggest you start behaving like a grown up. While I cannot demand it of you, you'll find it will all go a lot smoother if you do.

No thanks. If behaving like a grownup means trying to kill total strangers, I don't want any of that. I will continue to be a "child", happy, giving, trusting, faithful, trying to help others where ever I can. It makes me feel good and it makes me happy.

 

[leopold]

from wiki

Today, modern medicine recognises that there is no significant harm (short term or long term) caused by the practice of masturbation and regards it as a normal part of human sexuality to the point where the above medical studies suggest it has health benefits.
Contrary to popular myth, masturbation does not cause blindness. There is some basis, however, to the myth: zinc is required both to transport vitamin A from the liver to the retina and is excreted in relatively high amount in semen. Thus, it is not inconceivable that in zinc-deficient or vitamin A-deficient environments excessive male masturbation could have caused night blindness (in which case sexual intercourse has an equal probability of causing blindness). Given a normal contemporary diet, however, this is extremely unlikely to happen. There is also the more modern issue of staring at a computer screen while watching pornography for extended periods of time as the pupils tend to dilate during arousal.

rebuttals?

 

[Medicine*Woman]

With your line up of post meant to ridicule me, if you really want to look at the picture, find it yourself. After snakelord acted like he would be reasonable, then turned right back to being impossible, I am not in the mood to be tricked anymore.

*************
M*W: No one has 'tricked' you. You have deluded yourself.

 

[leopold]

With your line up of post meant to ridicule me,

i ridiculed? what is utrue about my post? here is your chance to make me look like the bad guy.

your "belief" that masturbation is the leading cause of death due to aids is 1000000000% wrong or are you refering to homosexuals? if you are then their lifestyle contributes not masturbation.

 

[Happeh]

from wiki

Today, modern medicine recognises that there is no significant harm (short term or long term) caused by the practice of masturbation and regards it as a normal part of human sexuality to the point where the above medical studies suggest it has health benefits.
Contrary to popular myth, masturbation does not cause blindness.

rebuttals?

That is false.

 

[Happeh]

*************
M*W: No one has 'tricked' you. You have deluded yourself.

You can believe that if you wish. It is not accurate.

 

[Happeh]

i ridiculed? what is utrue about my post? here is your chance to make me look like the bad guy.

your "belief" that masturbation is the leading cause of death due to aids is 1000000000% wrong or are you refering to homosexuals? if you are then their lifestyle contributes not masturbation.

If you slow down and think, it would be better for you.

You say that homosexual lifestyle contributes to AIDS, not masturbation.

How do you define "homosexual lifestyle"? One aspect of the homosexual lifestyle would of course be their sex practices. Masturbation is a sex practice.

Therefore, masturbation contributes to AIDS by your own words.

 

[leopold]

If you slow down and think, it would be better for you.

You say that homosexual lifestyle contributes to AIDS, not masturbation.

How do you define "homosexual lifestyle"? One aspect of the homosexual lifestyle would of course be their sex practices. Masturbation is a sex practice.

Therefore, masturbation contributes to AIDS by your own words.

i never said mastubation contributes to aids.
i said a homosexual lifestyle contributes to aids
a question
how does a person get aids?

 

[wesmorris]

indulgance is a form of flattery. *clears throat*

 

[leopold]

to be honest i think he's a phsycology proffeser that is taking notes on his carefully worded and deliberetly wrong posts. then again maybe not.

 

[SnakeLord]

Now that you have seen one photo, the idea is to discuss what my theory says about the photo. Once we get that all out of the way, then we start going thru more photos and looking for the same symptoms my theory predicts.

The problem here is that in each instance you fail to show how masturbation is connected. That is unless you have evidence to show that the people in the photos were mass-masturbators.

Your constant carping for instantaneous proof is childlike.

Either apologise for the lie or show me once in any post I have ever made on this forum where I have ever asked for 'instantaneous proof'.

Snakelord. I am a person on the internet speaking to you. I do not have a lab. I do not have a research grant. I do not have millions of dollars. You know that. Why are you saying all that foolishness above?

So basically because of that lack of funding and work space you concur that you have no evidence?

You never asked.

I shouldn't have to. It is your 'theory', not mine. When you go to such lengths to share a 'theory', it is up to you to provide the details.

I feel save in saying 3 to 5 years for any man.

What does 'any man' mean? You will find that the majority of men have masturbated for a longer period of time and yet do not suffer from blindness and are not gay. As a result your 'theory' instantly falls flat on it's face.

People who masturbate more frequently or in a specific way?

it's your 'theory', you tell me.

I would say off the top of my head that pressure applied by the hand is more important than speed.

With all due respect, but 'theories' rely on a little more than "off the top of my head".

If you would talk to me as a person, instead of demanding evidence

Kindly explain how asking for evidence is a sign that I am talking to you as anything other than a person. People ask other people for evidence when those people make claims. Get used to it.

As long as you continue to demand proof

Show me once in my entire history on this forum where I have demanded proof.

that only millions of dollars, a gaggle of experts, or a bank load of money can provide, I will never prove anything to you. I have none of those things.

Proof aside, do you have any evidence or are you stating that your lack of funding means you have none of that either? If you have no evidence, what are we here for?

Very simple. I am not your slave.

Nobody ever implied that you were, but if you make a claim and want people to pay attention, then you need some supporting evidence. Get used to it, that's how life is.

I completely agree.

And as a result, trying to ram one photo of an actor down my throat is meaningless.

The problem is, you forget to mention that I asked you for an analysis of the photo.

Fine, I shall play your games. The person isn't the most handsome guy on the planet. Wait, lets find a better photo. Let's take a look at a photo of the ugliest, illest man on the planet.. He's a living wreck.. Now show me how masturbation is related.

When I pointed out the red flush on the man's face and asked you specifically about it, you completely ignored my question.

It might be worth pointing out that you're not a very good liar. Scroll back up and check, you'll see that I did answer it.

Scientists are too close minded.

What a close minded statement. Just out of interest, how many 'scientists' do you know?

Every single one acts like you. It is their nature.

You mean they ask for evidence? Certainly, but that is not 'close minded', that is 'honesty'.

Also, if you did read it, you would go nuts. It is too much in one sitting.

Suffice it to say, you do not know me. It's worth the try imo.

Your world view is so narrow

Suffice it to say, you do not know me. In your own words: "I am a person on the internet speaking to you", nothing more.

To you, I am imagining. To me, you are stuck in the mud.

Evidence would clear that up pretty swiftly. Don't you agree?

I never even noticed "happeh assumption" until right now. This is you. You have to fight about everything. Instead of letting "happeh theory" go, as a friendly thing to do as part of the conversation, you MUST rewrite it as "happeh assumption", so that I am diminished.

It seems you need some education concerning the term 'theory'. Currently you're on an "assumption", nothing more. I will not lie to you and tell you that your assumption is a theory when it isn't.

When people like me meet people like you? We run away.

Of course, I'm an educated man. Your idiocy does not fool me. Your life of being bitchslapped by your mother because she caught you choking the chicken and the concluding fear of your own penis do not surprise me. You think you're new, you think you're original. I have seen literally hundreds of people like you. They all come out with some grandiose claims that, unsurprisingly enough, have no supporting evidence. Eventually I do cure, or certainly get closer to eradicating their problems.

I believe you could cause someone to die of a heart attack with your flair for verbal negativity.

Unless masturbation gets him first.

I have written a book. I am writing another one that will be finished this week. I have 2 more books planned.

I would be very interested to read them. Please provide publisher details and book details. Thank you in advance.

That is you. People like you have no feelings. Someone can kick and punch you because you do not feel it thru the solid block of wood that your body is.

I am a Vulcan in disguise. No really, I do have feelings - but me asking you for evidence to support your ludicrous claims is irrelevant to that.

As a scientist, you are supposed to be able to formulate your thoughts in an understandable way.

As a grown human you are supposed to be able to understand the question.

A regular person would relax and let the body do what it wants. A cold and rational approach could make the person stiffen up and try to stop the natural reactions to masturbation.

And thus any data extracted from the experiment would be flawed. Thank you.

The difference between the two is inconsequential.

Try again.

I really don't know why you are fixating on this.

Seemingly you don't know much of anything.

I keep telling you this is a complex subject I have fully thought thru.

And I have asked you for the complete text concerning it. Thank you in advance.

No....

Kindly provide the evidence of these two claims:

1) That you 'proved' anything and

2) That I ran away.

I will continue to be a "child", happy, giving, trusting, faithful

Add "ignorant" to that list.

 

[Happeh]

i never said mastubation contributes to aids.
i said a homosexual lifestyle contributes to aids

I know. I was trying to get you to see that masturbation is part of the homosexual lifestyle.

a question
how does a person get aids?

That depends on how you define AIDS. If you are talking about some virus or the other, then when you get the virus. If you are talking about when a person displays symptoms that are associated with AIDS, there is a difference.

My point is that the symptoms of AIDS could be something else. The scientists go looking for a virus, so they find one. They then blame this virus for AIDS. But that is not really correct. There was something else that gave rise to the symptoms of AIDS. Becuase the scientists do not believe in it, they don't bother looking for it.

 

[Happeh]

Either apologise for the lie or show me once in any post I have ever made on this forum where I have ever asked for 'instantaneous proof'.

There is nothing to apologize for. I am not one of your staff. I do not have to run and do your scut work for you.

What does 'any man' mean?

This is you playing your games. What does "any man" mean. Do you understand english? If not, get out the dictionary, or ask someone who does understand english.

it's your 'theory', you tell me.

More games. You mentioned speed of masturbation. My quote is in response to you saying that. Another example of you conveniently forgetting things that make you look bad.

With all due respect, but 'theories' rely on a little more than "off the top of my head".

More submission/dominance gaming. No point in saying this at all.

Kindly explain how asking for evidence is a sign that I am talking to you as anything other than a person. People ask other people for evidence when those people make claims. Get used to it.

I will never get used to purposefully obtuse, rude, demanding strangers.

Show me once in my entire history on this forum where I have demanded proof.

Great. Now I am justified in ignoring you. If you so blatantly lie about demanding proof, there is no point in talking to you. All I have to do is go back to the previous page to find you screaming "SHOW ME EVIDENCE!!!!!!"

Of course you, playing games, will say "I said proof, not evidence". What a loser your are. How can you be a doctor and indulge in such lies and games?

Proof aside, do you have any evidence or are you stating that your lack of funding means you have none of that either? If you have no evidence, what are we here for?

You are either insane, or you are purposefully playing games at my expense.

It might be worth pointing out that you're not a very good liar. Scroll back up and check, you'll see that I did answer it.

Playing a game with me. Whew! Now that I have discovered that, my conscience is clear. You are not a curious person. You are a person who enjoys hurting others playing a game with a new target you just encountered.

Suffice it to say, you do not know me. It's worth the try imo.

Sure it is worth it for you. It gives you a whole slew of things to point at, make fun of, pretend to forget, etc.

Suffice it to say, you do not know me. In your own words: "I am a person on the internet speaking to you", nothing more.

Sure I know you. You are a hater. You are a liar. You get your jollies by torturing strangers. What else is there to know?

Evidence would clear that up pretty swiftly. Don't you agree?

Nope. If I did show up with a study by scientists, you would say the scientists in question did not measure up. You are just playing a game here.

It seems you need some education concerning the term 'theory'. Currently you're on an "assumption", nothing more. I will not lie to you

Sure you would. You lie about every 4th statement.

Of course, I'm an educated man.

Keep telling yourself people run away because of your education, and not because you are an impossible person who makes people physically ill with your speech.

Your idiocy does not fool me. Your life of being bitchslapped by your mother because she caught you choking the chicken and the concluding fear of your own penis do not surprise me.

See? This is the SnakeLord I know. The one that caught my eye. The one abusing the woman lori because he enjoys torturing and hurting people.

I knew you would resort to your true nature. Evil always does.

Eventually I do cure, or certainly get closer to eradicating their problems.

Now we are getting somewhere. You are a psychologist or a psychiatrist or some mental health person. That displays your facility with mentally killing strangers.

I would be very interested to read them. Please provide publisher details and book details. Thank you in advance.

Sure you would. You would rush right out and buy them. Then you would proceed to belittle and denigrate every word on every page.

I am a Vulcan in disguise.

I don't believe that. I believe you have horns and a tail. Or maybe wings. I believe you enjoy hurting others and feeding off of the energy they release. You are a vampire most likely. Or a demon. Not much difference.

 

[Happeh]

The more I think of you, a mental health professional, using the knowledge they learned to help people, for hurting people on the internet, the more I am sick at the stomach.

You have been playing a game with me from the first page. I accused you of dominance games from the very start. You began lying from the first page, saying it was about information and not dominance.

All those constant demands for evidence was you employing your training in psychiatry in order to cause hurt to another person.

You are sick. evil. You enjoy hurting others. You can't see any of it because your mind is clouded by hate and evil. If you weren't so impossible, I might even say I felt sorry for you.

As it is, I kind of enjoy knowing that you will suffer for years before you finally wake up to the choice you have made. I will not be a total jerk. You can always change and work for good. That is what good does. Forgives.

But in the meantime, you are throwing years of your life away until you learn the lesson. I have no qualms at all about smiling and enjoying the though of you wasting years of your life suffering and living with hate and evil.

Have a good time!