Marriage: Christians and Atheists

[markl323]

what about agnostic? it's the only religion that's compatible with science.

 

[kx000]

what about agnostic? it's the only religion that's compatible with science.

I follow scientific fact. I do not follow the rules of science, however.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I follow scientific fact.

Oops, no you don't.

I do not follow the rules of science, however.

In which case you have no idea what a scientific fact is.

 

[markl323]

fact is...you can't prove a negative.

 

[Dywyddyr]

fact is...you can't prove a negative.

And that comment is apropos of... what?

 

[Arioch]

@mark --

I can prove a negative depending on the circumstances. If you say that there is a cat in a box I can easily prove that there is no cat in the box by lifting the lid and looking in there. The absence of a cat in the box is absolute proof of a negative.

 

[NMSquirrel]

@mark --

I can prove a negative depending on the circumstances. If you say that there is a cat in a box I can easily prove that there is no cat in the box by lifting the lid and looking in there. The absence of a cat in the box is absolute proof of a negative.

shake it..put a dog in it..don't have to actually 'look' in the box..
(what does it mean i misspelled dog as god..?)
jk..

 

[Dywyddyr]

You don't have an option for me to check
I wouldn't marry a Christian. Or an atheist.

 

[NMSquirrel]

You don't have an option for me to check
I wouldn't marry a Christian. Or an atheist.

a dog is not a christian or an atheist....:bugeye:

 

[Dywyddyr]

a dog is not a christian or an atheist....:bugeye:

I wouldn't marry a dog either.

 

[kx000]

Oops, no you don't.


In which case you have no idea what a scientific fact is.

I know what a scientific fact is. I use biblical truth, knowledge of world events, a basic knowledge in other scholarly areas, and a lot of human history to present my theories unto you. If you don't like what I say to you then give me alternate theory.

 

[kx000]

I wouldn't marry a dog either.

I might. Mostly for the companionship.

 

[NMSquirrel]

I might. Mostly for the companionship.

Don't do it guys..it is way to easy...

 

[Dywyddyr]

I know what a scientific fact is.

Apparently not.

I use biblical truth

Such as?

knowledge of world events

Oh yeah. Your knowledge of world events. This from the guy that thought Kennedy's speech about the Bay of Pigs was current.

a basic knowledge in other scholarly areas

"Basic" is about all you have.

and a lot of human history to present my theories unto you

You mean your particular (false) view of history?

If you don't like what I say to you then give me alternate theory

Why? When you present something it's up to you to support it.
Oh, and you don't have any "theories". Just wild speculation.

 

[Syzygys]

Could you, as a Christian or Atheist, marry the opposite?

The question is kind of badly phrased. There are huge differences between a so-so believer and a orthodox fundy...

 

[kx000]

You mean your particular (false) view of history?

History has been written by the victor, always has been, always will be.

 

[Dywyddyr]

History has been written by the victor, always has been, always will be.

Also wrong.

 

[kx000]

Also wrong.

No.

 

[Dywyddyr]

No.

Because you say so?
Then please explain the plethora of, for example, books on the German point of view on WWII.

Oh, and nice deflection BTW.

 

[kx000]

Because you say so?
Then please explain the plethora of, for example, books on the German point of view on WWII.

Oh, and nice deflection BTW.

What?