Man Has Never Set Foot on Moon
- Thread starter BrainWithAGun
- Start date
i guess you realize that the moon has moonquakes.
that could also explain the observed motion.
river-wind
Valued Senior Member
If you want to look for atmosphere, look at the dust the astronauts kick up. fine particulate matter that rises and falls in a parabolic arc - no eddies or billowing patterns, just up, then down. This is not possible in atmosphere.
There is also the low gravity. On Earth you can spread any fine powder that you want. It won't kick up way high just because someone stepped in it.
And no, man has never set foot on the moon. He was wearing boots.
Aegiltheugly
Registered Member
This topic belongs on a paranoid fantasy website!
river-wind
Valued Senior Member
Try kicking a fine powder up to shin height and let me know how quickly it all resettles to the ground.
Why don't we just look at where anyone says they were on the moon with
the Hubble telescope to see whether or not anything is there?
the Hubble telescope to see whether or not anything is there?
because that would solve this whole debate/issue........then what the hell would we do with ourselves....
Janus58
Valued Senior Member
Because the Hubble has a maximum resolution of 0.1 arcseconds, which at the distance of the Moon works out to over 150m. Meaning the smallest an object can be and still be seen as a distinct object is over 150m across.
Besides that, even if the Hubble were able to see the artifacts left on the Moon, those who believe that the landings were faked would just believe that the Hubble images were faked as well.
It goes such a short distance that the effect isn't noticable.
Watch the footage of the rover.
youtube.com/watch?v=ZxdPP7DdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=npARfNtO7u8
You can also see the rover footage played here at double speed.
video.google.es/videoplay?docid=4135126565081757736
21minute 10 second mark
It looks just like a dune buggy on earth. The theory is that the rover footage was taken on earth and played back at half speed.
The material the rover kicks up looks like course sand. Also, sand can be treated to be dust-free by sifting and washing it.
Reflectors could have been attached to an unmanned craft that was soft-landed.
You are assuming the official version of what was happening reflects reality. Have you read Chomsky's analysis of the cold war?
zmag.org/chomsky/sam/sam-3-1.html
zmag.org/Chomsky/dd/dd-c01-s01.html
nardwuar.com/vs/bill_kaysing/index.html
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, why did they keep faking the Apollo flights, I still don't understand. Did the Soviet Union know it was faked? Why did they keep shut up if they knew it was faked? 'Cause a lot of people would think they kept the moon race going to prove the U.S. was better than the Soviet Union. If the Soviet Union knew, why did they let the U.S. get away with this?
Well, I'll tell you - at the highest levels there is a coalition between governments. In other words, the Soviets said, if you won't tell on us - and they faked most of their space exploration flights - we won't tell on you. It's as simple as that. See, what Apollo is, is the beginning of the end of the ability of the government to hoodwink and bamboozle and manipulate the people. More and more people are becoming aware in the U.S. that the government is totally and completely public enemy number one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We wouldn't think Hubble was faked. Pictures can be faked though so if they ever say that an orbiting craft took some pictures of the landing sites and publish them, we'll have to keep that in mind. They should be examined by objective experts. We also have to keep in mind that scientists can be bought.
This woman talks about how a lot of the science community has sold out.
Look what this scientist says about science fraud.
GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #1
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3626298989248030643
(around the 30 minute mark)
GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #2
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7451332617120640846
river-wind
Valued Senior Member
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...903&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
It does?
Looks like non-interfered arcing with a slower acceleration curve, to me.
I think the nay-sayers were impressed by an excellent movie about a faked space mission. I think James Brolin played the lead role.
In that movie the empty space craft was destroyed on return to Earth and a key NASA honcho wanted the astronauts to go under cover & allow all to believe that they died.
They decided not to trust the honcho and did not want to play dead anyway. Most of the movie followed the astronauts as they attempted to reach a major city to report the hoax.
Each took a different route from the desert location of the movie studio in hopes of one of them evading the bad guys. In addition to giving them better odds of at least one of them reporting to a news media, they knew that none would be executed until all were captured.
In that movie the empty space craft was destroyed on return to Earth and a key NASA honcho wanted the astronauts to go under cover & allow all to believe that they died.
They decided not to trust the honcho and did not want to play dead anyway. Most of the movie followed the astronauts as they attempted to reach a major city to report the hoax.
Each took a different route from the desert location of the movie studio in hopes of one of them evading the bad guys. In addition to giving them better odds of at least one of them reporting to a news media, they knew that none would be executed until all were captured.
of course e have been to the moon, if you have never been to australia does it not excist?