Luminiferous Aether Exists!

[gravitational_aether]

So the aether is responsible for the wave nature. You must be saying that aether turns into photons? Otherwise there would be aether waves through one slit and photons through the other slit and there would not be an interference pattern. The interference pattern is light and dark bands so the aether must be photons...

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The “energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

"the particle is defined as a very small region of the wave"

In de Broglie wave mechanics there is a particle AND a wave. The particle occupies a very small region of the wave.

'Quantum mechanics rule 'bent' in classic experiment'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13626587

'For his part, Professor Steinberg believes that the result reduces a limitation not on quantum physics but on physicists themselves. "I feel like we're starting to pull back a veil on what nature really is," he said. "The trouble with quantum mechanics is that while we've learned to calculate the outcomes of all sorts of experiments, we've lost much of our ability to describe what is really happening in any natural language. I think that this has really hampered our ability to make progress, to come up with new ideas and see intuitively how new systems ought to behave."'

'New 'Double Slit' Experiment Skirts Uncertainty Principle'
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

A particle physically displaces the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the aether which passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Strongly detecting the particle turns the aether wave into chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and continues on the path it is traveling.

What waves in a double slit experiment is the aether.

 

[origin]

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter.

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

A field in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position.

So the displaced aether does not act like pressure?

 

[gravitational_aether]

So the displaced aether does not act like pressure?

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

 

[origin]

A particle physically displaces the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit. It is the associated wave in the aether which passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Strongly detecting the particle turns the aether wave into chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and continues on the path it is traveling.

So the aether imparts a force on the particle. Also the particle actually causes the waves. That would mean of course that the particles are losing energy and should slow down from the aether but that does no happen. Why is that?

 

[origin]

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

Why do larger masses have larger gravity?

 

[gravitational_aether]

So the aether imparts a force on the particle. Also the particle actually causes the waves. That would mean of course that the particles are losing energy and should slow down from the aether but that does no happen. Why is that?

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

There is no loss of energy in the interaction of a particle of matter and a supersolid. Whatever energy the particle requires to displace the supersolid the supersolid returns to the particle as the supersolid 'displaces back'.

Q. Is the particle dispacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the particle?
A. Both are occurring simultaneously with equal force.

 

[origin]

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

There is no loss of energy in the interaction of a particle of matter and a supersolid. Whatever energy the particle requires to displace the supersolid the supersolid returns to the particle as the supersolid 'displaces back'.

Oh, I see the aether acts like a supersolid with zero viscosity, and as you say, "Whatever energy the particle requires to displace the supersolid the supersolid returns to the particle as the supersolid 'displaces back'."

So particles moving through the aether will not cause a wave front. So the idea about the double slit experiment can't be from waves. You can't have it both ways g_a!

 

[gravitational_aether]

Why do larger masses have larger gravity?

Aether exists where particles of matter do not. The more particles of matter which exist within a particular volume the less aether the volume contains the greater the displacement of the aether from the volume the greater the force of the displaced aether exerted toward and throughout the volume.

You have the gaseous Jupiter in our solar system and a Jupiter made out of lead. The lead Jupiter contains more particles of matter then the gaseous Jupiter does. The lead Jupiter displaces more aether then the gaseous Jupiter does. There is more displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the lead Jupiter than there is the gaseous Jupiter.

If you take the lead Jupiter and you were to spread out its matter then the displaced aether outside of that area would be pushing back and exerting inward pressure the same as for the lead Jupiter with a diameter of our gaseous Jupiter. The reason for using volume is to help visualize how aether is displaced by the particles of matter which exist within a particular region of three dimensional space.

 

[gravitational_aether]

Oh, I see the aether acts like a supersolid with zero viscosity, and as you say, "Whatever energy the particle requires to displace the supersolid the supersolid returns to the particle as the supersolid 'displaces back'."

So particles moving through the aether will not cause a wave front. So the idea about the double slit experiment can't be from waves. You can't have it both ways g_a!

It does cause a wave front. However, the wave front does not dissipate.

What do you think happens if you were to roll a bowling ball down a lane in a bowling ally filled with a supersolid? If you roll the bowling ball fast enough the supersolid is going to be displaced into a wave.

'Superfluid Is Shown To Have Property Of A Solid'
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/07/990730072958.htm

"Northwestern University physicists have for the first time shown that superfluid helium-3 -- the lighter isotope of helium, which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance and ooze through tiny spaces that normal liquids cannot penetrate -- actually behaves like a solid in its ability to conduct sound waves."

Supersolids wave.

 

[origin]

Aether exists where particles of matter do not. The more particles of matter which exist within a particular volume the less aether the volume contains the greater the displacement of the aether from the volume the greater the force of the displaced aether exerted toward and throughout the volume.

You have the gaseous Jupiter in our solar system and a Jupiter made out of lead. The lead Jupiter contains more particles of matter then the gaseous Jupiter does. The lead Jupiter displaces more aether then the gaseous Jupiter does. There is more displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the lead Jupiter than there is the gaseous Jupiter.

If you take the lead Jupiter and you were to spread out its matter then the displaced aether outside of that area would be pushing back and exerting inward pressure the same as for the lead Jupiter with a diameter of our gaseous Jupiter. The reason for using volume is to help visualize how aether is displaced by the particles of matter which exist within a particular region of three dimensional space.

The problem is that you say the aether is no more dense around the body that displaced it. That would mean that the size and or mass would not matter. The aether would be like pressure in your scenario in which case the 'presure' exerted by the aether would be independent of the amount of aether displaced. This is true of water where whether the bodie is the size of a pea or beach ball the pressure felt by the surface is identical.

 

[OnlyMe]

Aether has mass.

I believe that, as much as any other of your fantasies, the above statement demonstrates your complete ignorance of what you speak.

Before that statement can have any meaning, "what mass is", must first be defined. Add to that.., that the deffinitions of mass and inertia are so intertwined and to some extent interdependent, that the obvious ignorance, of that statement is compounded.

While, IF space-time as described by GR and the ZPF of the vacuum as described within QM, are similar to a nearly perfect fluid, then it is almost certain that space-time or the ZPF, as the case may be, would contribute to what we understand as mass and inertia, but it does not follow that either space-time or the ZPF have any inherent mass or independent inertia, of their own. (There are arguments supporting the characterization of both space-time and the ZPF, which include some intrinsic inertia, but mass?)

Part of the problem with the illusions, delusions and fantasies you have been projecting, is that there are some underlying similarities with real science and physics, which apear to be so far beyond your comprehension, that you are left with nothing more than the fantasies of imagination, peppered with concepts and explainations most often seen in fringe and pseudoscientific, pap.

It does not appear that you understand most if not all of your references. Nor does it seem you understand the difference between experimental and/or observational evidence and an abstract theoretical exploration.

 

[gravitational_aether]

The problem is that you say the aether is no more dense around the body that displaced it. That would mean that the size and or mass would not matter. The aether would be like pressure in your scenario in which case the 'presure' exerted by the aether would be independent of the amount of aether displaced. This is true of water where whether the bodie is the size of a pea or beach ball the pressure felt by the surface is identical.

Water is a liquid.

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

'"In a simplified view, a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position."

A "field" in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. The more particles of matter the greater the displacement of the aether from its rest position the greater the strength of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

This is what Voyager detected.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

 

[origin]

It does cause a wave front. However, the wave front does not dissipate.

What do you think happens if you were to roll a bowling ball down a lane in a bowling ally filled with a supersolid? If you roll the bowling ball fast enough the supersolid is going to be displaced into a wave.

'Superfluid Is Shown To Have Property Of A Solid'
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/07/990730072958.htm

"Northwestern University physicists have for the first time shown that superfluid helium-3 -- the lighter isotope of helium, which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance and ooze through tiny spaces that normal liquids cannot penetrate -- actually behaves like a solid in its ability to conduct sound waves."

Supersolids wave.

Apparently you did not understand the article - read it again paying particular attention to the discussion about transverse waves. Then read what you wrote agian, "which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance". No resistance, no waves, no loss of energy - no aether (as you define it).

 

[gravitational_aether]

I believe that, as much as any other of your fantasies, the above statement demonstrates your complete ignorance of what you speak.

Before that statement can have any meaning, "what mass is", must first be defined. Add to that.., that the deffinitions of mass and inertia are so intertwined and to some extent interdependent, that the obvious ignorance, of that statement is compounded.

While, IF space-time as described by GR and the ZPF of the vacuum as described within QM, are similar to a nearly perfect fluid, then it is almost certain that space-time or the ZPF, as the case may be, would contribute to what we understand as mass and inertia, but it does not follow that either space-time or the ZPF have any inherent mass or independent inertia, of their own. (There are arguments supporting the characterization of both space-time and the ZPF, which include some intrinsic inertia, but mass?)

Part of the problem with the illusions, delusions and fantasies you have been projecting, is that there are some underlying similarities with real science and physics, which apear to be so far beyond your comprehension, that you are left with nothing more than the fantasies of imagination, peppered with concepts and explainations most often seen in fringe and pseudoscientific, pap.

It does not appear that you understand most if not all of your references. Nor does it seem you understand the difference between experimental and/or observational evidence and an abstract theoretical exploration.

You are still missing the point. The dark matter core contains less galaxies than there would be if the galaxies and the dark matter were anchored together. This means dark matter is not anchored to matter. If dark matter is not anchored to matter then that means matter moves through the dark matter. What this means is what is referred to as dark matter is the aether. Aether has mass.

When you understand dark matter not anchored to galaxies means the galaxies move through the dark matter then let me know.

 

[origin]

Water is a liquid.

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

'"In a simplified view, a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position."

A "field" in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. The more particles of matter the greater the displacement of the aether from its rest position the greater the strength of the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

This is what Voyager detected.

'NASA's Voyager Hits New Region at Solar System Edge'
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/dec/HQ_11-402_AGU_Voyager.html

"Voyager is showing that what is outside is pushing back. ... Like cars piling up at a clogged freeway off-ramp, the increased intensity of the magnetic field shows that inward pressure from interstellar space is compacting it."

It is not the particles of matter which exist in quantities less than in any vacuum artifically created on Earth which are pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

It is the aether, the particles of matter exist in, which is the interstellar medium. It is the aether which is displaced by the matter the solar system consists of which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the solar system.

Repeating things over and over is the same tactic that you used last time as MPC7555 and it didn't work then. I think you repeated the same things as you are now! Why don't you answer my question as to why different masses have different 'aether pressures'?

 

[gravitational_aether]

Apparently you did not understand the article - read it again paying particular attention to the discussion about transverse waves. Then read what you wrote agian, "which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance". No resistance, no waves, no loss of energy - no aether (as you define it).

What part of, "actually behaves like a solid in its ability to conduct sound waves", are you unable to understand?

You are able to understand a sound wave is a wave, correct?

 

[gravitational_aether]

Repeating things over and over is the same tactic that you used last time as MPC7555 and it didn't work then. I think you repeated the same things as you are now! Why don't you answer my question as to why different masses have different 'aether pressures'?

There is no point in trying to move this conversation along when you can't understand dark matter not anchored to galaxies means galaxies move through dark matter.

 

[OnlyMe]

You are still missing the point. The dark matter core contains less galaxies than there would be if the galaxies and the dark matter were anchored together. This means dark matter is not anchored to matter. If dark matter is not anchored to matter then that means matter moves through the dark matter. What this means is what is referred to as dark matter is the aether. Aether has mass.

When you understand dark matter not anchored to galaxies means the galaxies move through the dark matter then let me know.

You continue to miss the point. What is observed does not prove the existence of Dark Matter, of any composition. All it proves is that something affects the way light moves through space-time, on it way to us, that is not consistent with GR, without some addition of gravitational mass we cannot see, measure or fully explain.

All it proves is that gravitational lensing, or what we associate with gravitational lensing, appears to be originating from something we cannot yet adequately explain.

 

[origin]

I was incorrect, it is possible get waves in a super fluid. That of course does not mean your idea of the double slit experiment makes any sense. I still am waiting for you answer my question about why different masses have different 'aether pressures'.

 

[origin]

There is no point in trying to move this conversation along when you can't understand dark matter not anchored to galaxies means galaxies move through dark matter.

I have not addressed that - I am waiting fo your answer to my question.