i thought you were going to refute the argument of improbability
Let's all have a big fight over my mortal soul.
- Thread starter redarmy11
- Start date
i thought you were going to refute the argument of improbability
The argument of improbability is also a concept. It rests on the belief that the argument is true or falsifiable.
Well you can't.
That is an interesting concept; but does it not decree that delegation is not a part of the chain of causality?
make the case, any case
and insist on an acknowledgement
the status quo is unacceptable
sci has to make an impact
listen
when you chose to say that a creator has designed life as it is, because it couldn't have been created on its own, you push the problem foward, you don't explain anything, you are left with the same question
delegation?
if god dont love you no more, we will.
forever and ever
oh
sci claims your soul
resistance is futile
you did not know that?
/perplexed
Thats how you reference it. According to you, the creator is part of the creation.
you think you ever had the freedom?
it is your tradition that made that determination
cognitive dissonance exemplified
ja
that what we have here
You of course, have fought against established beliefs to adopt argument from other authority.
Hi,
I'm redarmy11 and I'm a cowardly, fence-sitting agnostic. I is feeling left out.
Theists: show me the Light and the Way.
Atheists: convert me to the Dark Side.
Go.
P. S. You are all mad.
you choose your own destiny my friend and if we show you our own, why claim that it is fallacy? Our destiny is our own, your destiny is yours to keep, "to each his own" is truth eternal.
To each his own truth, to each his own dream and destiny, and if you choose to follow others, all you are bound but to see are faults and cynicism at heart and mind that questions truth behind the reason of this fate you self inflicted on yourself to follow others when you could discove...your own truth, your own flower in field were all our flowers bloom.