Are you saying those 9 people were killed for allegedly singing allegedly inappropriate songs?
I don't know. Bells, is this what you're saying?
Are you saying those 9 people were killed for allegedly singing allegedly inappropriate songs?
Your concern for the Palestinians is pretentious and shrill, and I accuse you of doing it expressly to drive a hidden agenda. I think that you are a deeply closeted anti-semite. I doubt you even admit it to yourself.And where have I said this? Do you have a link?
Personally, I am somewhat optimistic about Fatah. Although they are far from perfect, I can see them developing a secure state within the next decade IF we strenuously support and fund them in doing so. As far as other groups in the general region are concerned, I have speculated about the potential of Hezbollah.I actually support neither. Why? Because of the politics that caused them to come into existence and what they are now is not what they should be.
Therefore you have chosen to deal with this by getting people angry at Israel and "the Jews." You seem to think that all of the Jews in Israel are "settlers." It doesn't seem to make a difference to you if they are third-generation.So settlers who kick people out of their homes to move in is what exactly?
The Arabic families in question should seek reparations from the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordon, which did not have the right to sell the land in question to them. Jordon's annexation of West Bank was illegal, and it was only recognized by the governments of Britain and Pakistan. This has created part of the problem.Look at how much land Palestinians have left now. They are being squeezed into ghettos. Do you think that is a fair deal? And you accuse me of hatred?
That sounds like "I have friends who are black."My aunt is Jewish and survived the concentration camps as a small child. She does not march to the same beat of the drum that forces people from their homes. Now, is she an anti-semite for not supporting the Israeli Government's policies?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_...sraeli–Palestinian_conflict#Incidents_in_2007Why are all Palestinians, even small school children, treated like terrorists at road blocks?
Yes, I do.And you dare accuse me of dehumanising people?
The Labor government was actually more than accomodating. Kadima, to a lesser extent, also endeavored to establish better relations with the Palestinians. They would value your support. Even if you don't agree with the policies of Kadima, they would still be an improvement over Netanyahu's Likud/Yisrael Beiteinu coalition.That the actions of Israel's Government (past and present) are so fucking familiar does not disturb you at all?
I hereby invoke Godwin's Law:Any Government, regardless of their religion, who commits these kinds of acts is also committing gross acts against basic, fundamental human rights. It was so in South Africa. It was so in Rwanda in the lead up to the genocide. It was so when the Nazi's did it to the Jews and when the Turks did it to the Armenians before those genocides. It was so in the Balkans and it is so in Israel and in Sudan.
Okay, then what do you think led to you having such a suspicious, resentful attitude toward the Jewish people? One thing that I have never understood is the unreasoning paranoia that seems to be associated with European anti-semitism.If that makes me an anti-semite, then fine.
The only way you ever seem to refer to them is "Jewish settlers" or "The Israeli government." You never seem to specify any of the particular individuals or factions who may be responsible for the problems you are trying to point out.Where have I said that Israelis are not actual people.
I am a guy, you ridiculous person.What can I say to you at this point? Oh yes.. Suck it up Princess.
I don't know. Bells, is this what you're saying?
Aunt Sally asked Huck why the steamboat took so long getting there.
Huck said, “We blowed a cylinder-head.”
“Good gracious anybody hurt?”
“No’m killed a nigger.”
“Well it’s lucky; because sometimes people do get hurt”
The only way you ever seem to refer to them is "Jewish settlers" or "The Israeli government." You never seem to specify any of the particular individuals or factions who may be responsible for the problems you are trying to point out.
I don't know what Bells is saying
Your concern for the Palestinians is pretentious and shrill, and I accuse you of doing it expressly to drive a hidden agenda. I think that you are a deeply closeted anti-semite. I doubt you even admit it to yourself.
Personally, I am somewhat optimistic about Fatah. Although they are far from perfect, I can see them developing a secure state within the next decade IF we strenuously support and fund them in doing so.
Therefore you have chosen to deal with this by getting people angry at Israel and "the Jews." You seem to think that all of the Jews in Israel are "settlers." It doesn't seem to make a difference to you if they are third-generation.
As long as people like you keep spouting venom over the issue, though, Israel will not reform. If they feel that they are under attack, then they will only swing farther and farther to the political right.
My beef with you is that, instead of supporting reforms in Israel, instead of invoking support for Kadima or Labor, you have been adding kindling to the fire.
Your aunt's background is irrelevant. Even if you were Jewish and lived year-round in Tel Aviv, you are still endangering other people's lives if you are spouting inflammatory tripe where other people can see it. Tone it down, and try focusing on solutions instead of yapping about the "Israeli settlers" as if that's going to solve something.
Why can't we try empowering political camps in Israel who might put an end to these evictions you are so concerned about?
I hereby invoke Godwin's Law:
Look, by attacking Israel in general instead of the factions that are responsible for most of the problems, you are putting the Israeli voting population on the defensive, which swings their politics right.
The Israeli right-wing is the same group of people that is responsible for the evictions you are so concerned about. If you attack Israel over their behavior, you are making the Israelis more inclined to vote for them. You saw the same thing happen when Americans were attacked over the policies of George W. Bush: when you put a country on the defensive, you always empower the most rabidly nationalistic, right-wing factions of that country's government.
I think that Israel is a great culture,
and I hope earnestly that they can make peace with their Arabic neighbors and their Palestinian minority.
Okay, then what do you think led to you having such a suspicious, resentful attitude toward the Jewish people?
The only way you ever seem to refer to them is "Jewish settlers" or "The Israeli government." You never seem to specify any of the particular individuals or factions who may be responsible for the problems you are trying to point out.
quadraphonics, Zionists aren't true Jews -.-.
but...they were singing* rude songs!!!
Your concern for the Palestinians is pretentious and shrill, and I accuse you of doing it expressly to drive a hidden agenda. I think that you are a deeply closeted anti-semite. I doubt you even admit it to yourself.
Neither is good. Hezbollah would never be accepted at the bargaining table. All are mostly interested in themselves first and foremost.Personally, I am somewhat optimistic about Fatah. Although they are far from perfect, I can see them developing a secure state within the next decade IF we strenuously support and fund them in doing so. As far as other groups in the general region are concerned, I have speculated about the potential of Hezbollah.
I would have assumed that my posts were clear. That criticisms levelled at "Israel" were levelled at the Government.Therefore you have chosen to deal with this by getting people angry at Israel and "the Jews." You seem to think that all of the Jews in Israel are "settlers." It doesn't seem to make a difference to you if they are third-generation.
Ah, so we are in agreement then?The Arabic families in question should seek reparations from the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordon, which did not have the right to sell the land in question to them. Jordon's annexation of West Bank was illegal, and it was only recognized by the governments of Britain and Pakistan. This has created part of the problem.
On the other hand, I disagree with the eviction of second- or third-generation Arabs from these properties. If the families are established there and live in peace with their neighbors, then they should be left unmolested.
Quite the contrary. If the world puts pressure on Israel to adopt more humane practices, change can follow. There is a vast amount of internal pressure from the left to push for change in policy that is driving the country into not only international disrepute, but also down a path no country wants to go down. The political right, in Israel, will always have a strong voice, simply because of the fear of Israelis. As long as any criticism is called anti-semitism, then there will always be a problem. That is the mindset. I mean look at you? You're calling me an anti-semite because I criticise Israel's policies in the region.As long as people like you keep spouting venom over the issue, though, Israel will not reform. If they feel that they are under attack, then they will only swing farther and farther to the political right.
Oh, I strongly support any reform in Israel. My criticism is levelled squarely at the right and its policies that see us where we are today. I would have assumed that was quite clear. I support people like Braverman who at least, recognises the inequality within the population.My beef with you is that, instead of supporting reforms in Israel, instead of invoking support for Kadima or Labor, you have been adding kindling to the fire.
People like me?People like you created Netanyahu. I resent his lot and their attitude as much as you do. I just hold you partially to blame for them.
So criticising the right, who you also "apparently" disagree with is anti-semitism and doing so is spreading anti-semitic propaganda? Pray tell, how so? I am a hate-monger for voicing my discontent with something you supposedly agree with? But you are not an anti-semitic because you shut up and like Geoff, wring your hands?That sounds like "I have friends who are black."
When you spout anti-semitic propaganda on a publicly accessible forum, that makes you an anti-semite and a hate-monger, no matter how you go about equivocating over it. It doesn't matter if you lack the gumption to come clean about your real views.
You mean shut up and say nothing, not criticise or comment, because any criticism of their policy is anti-semitic? Right? You mean be like you? A silent coward?Your aunt's background is irrelevant. Even if you were Jewish and lived year-round in Tel Aviv, you are still endangering other people's lives if you are spouting inflammatory tripe where other people can see it. Tone it down, and try focusing on solutions instead of yapping about the "Israeli settlers" as if that's going to solve something.
How does one empower any political camp if criticising the other camp is defined as anti-semitic? It is the right, who views such criticism as being anti-semitic, something the left recognises. A subtle difference you cannot quite grasp.Why can't we try empowering political camps in Israel who might put an end to these evictions you are so concerned about? Or perhaps you could try investigating the details behind the court cases that lead to the evictions.
Which is appalling, in and of itself.
I am a very strong supporter of Kadima. But when the rules that would bring them to the table includes bowing to pressure from the right and fear mongering, then something needs to be said.The Labor government was actually more than accomodating. Kadima, to a lesser extent, also endeavored to establish better relations with the Palestinians. They would value your support. Even if you don't agree with the policies of Kadima, they would still be an improvement over Netanyahu's Likud/Yisrael Beiteinu coalition.
Interior Ministry regulations provide for the abrogation of the rights of Palestinian residents of Jerusalem who leave the city for a period of over seven years. Citizens of Israel can leave the country for any length of time, and their citizenship and all their rights are theirs in perpetuity. But when it comes to Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem, Israel applies draconian regulations whose covert intent is to bring about the expulsion of as many Palestinians as possible from their home city.
This situation is intolerable: At a time when the prime minister speaks grandiloquently of the reunification of Jerusalem, Israel practices inequality and discriminates against the city's Arab residents. At a time when Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of the economic advancement of the territories, Israel prevents the Arab residents of East Jerusalem from advancing their careers abroad and returning afterward to their home city to contribute toward the development of its economy. The screws have been tightened in recent years: In 2008 the residents' rights of 4,557 Palestinian inhabitants of the city were abrogated, the highest number ever.
Waiting on Judge Sohlberg now is not only the fate of two electrical engineering lecturers, but a far weightier question: Will Israel continue treating the Palestinian inhabitants of its capital as if they were foreign migrants whose rights are conditional?
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-silent-expulsion-1.297577
The dim is strong in you, isn't it?Look, by attacking Israel in general instead of the factions that are responsible for most of the problems, you are putting the Israeli voting population on the defensive, which swings their politics right. What I favor is trying to revitalize parties in Israel who favor more peaceful relations with the Muslim world.
The Israeli right-wing is the same group of people that is responsible for the evictions you are so concerned about. If you attack Israel over their behavior, you are making the Israelis more inclined to vote for them. You saw the same thing happen when Americans were attacked over the policies of George W. Bush: when you put a country on the defensive, you always empower the most rabidly nationalistic, right-wing factions of that country's government. I think that Israel is a great culture, and I hope earnestly that they can make peace with their Arabic neighbors and their Palestinian minority.
A few days after saying he intends to take action against Israeli professors who call for an academic boycott of Israel, Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar is scheduled to appear on Monday before the Knesset Education Committee to discuss the limits of freedom of expression in schools.
-----------------------------------
The comments came some time after Ben-Gurion University Professor Neve Gordon, a vocal proponent of an academic boycott against Israel, received a death threat through the mail.
The principals of two Tel Aviv high schools, Zeev Dagani and Ram Cohen, who have publicly criticized the government's policies in the territories, have also been invited to today's committee meeting.
Dagani, the principal of the Herzliya Gymnasia high school, has publicly opposed Sa'ar's plan to send Israel Defense Forces officers into classrooms to encourage students to enlist in the army, and Cohen has often lectured his students about the Israeli occupation.
---------------------------------
Sa'ar's statements were part of a discussion in the Knesset plenum initiated by MKs Uri Ariel (National Union ) and Yulia Shamalov Berkovich (Kadima ) on the issue of "the post-Zionist takeover of Israeli academia." The discussion was prompted by the Im Tirtzu report, which stated that 80 percent of the research papers taught at political science courses in Israeli universities are "anti-Zionist and anti-nationalist." The report was roundly criticized by academics and public figures, but Im Tirtzu officials said they stood behind the study.
"Israeli academia apparently suffers from 'Palestinomania,' a mild psychological illness whose symptoms include self-hatred, an affinity for Israel's enemies, Jewish anti-Semitism and/or anti-Zionism," Shamalov Berkovich said in the Knesset. "The spread of 'Palestinomania' demands the immediate and painful treatment for all of our sake, and the sooner the better."
------------------------
A spokesperson for Trajtenberg refused to comment when reached by Haaretz, deferring to Sa'ar's office.
"It would behoove the education minister to ignore the report, which emits an aroma of McCarthyism," said Professor Yossi Ben-Artzi, the rector of the University of Haifa. "I hope he will understand the gravity of the very fact of monitoring and informing on lecturers, and of whether he even needs to take seriously an organization like Im Tirtzu, which causes incitement." Earlier this year Sa'ar took part in a conference organized by Im Tirtzu. "I place great importance in this gathering," he said. "Campus activism is hugely vital, and this is what you are doing. For this, you will be blessed." "I very much appreciate this work, which gives expression to an authentic Zeitgeist felt by the public and is much needed on our campuses," Sa'ar said of Im Tirtzu. "I came to tell you: God speed."
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/education-minister-vows-to-punish-israeli-professors-who-back-academic-boycott-1.297330
I don't have a problem with the Jewish people. I do have a problem with the line of thought that any criticism of policy is automatically anti-semitic. So much so that educators in Israel are at risk of being branded anti-semitic for teaching about democracy and showing photos of IDF soldiers beating Palestinian children. That article is indicative of the downward spiral Israel finds itself in. Israel wants to be a part of the world community? Then in doing so, it also needs to be open to the fact that the world will criticise it when it acts like a spoilt child and implements policies that are designed to divide and cause further unrest and hatred, amongst its Jewish populace, and also with its non-Jewish populace and the occupied Palestinian areas.Okay, then what do you think led to you having such a suspicious, resentful attitude toward the Jewish people? One thing that I have never understood is the unreasoning paranoia that seems to be associated with European anti-semitism.
I'm sorry. I assumed you had the intelligence to tell the difference. I will know in the future that you do not. My sincere apologies.The only way you ever seem to refer to them is "Jewish settlers" or "The Israeli government." You never seem to specify any of the particular individuals or factions who may be responsible for the problems you are trying to point out.
So you're a guy? And?I am a guy, you ridiculous person.
I tend to favor the Alignment.Why is it that supporters of the Israeli Government and policies spout "anti-semitism" at even a hint of criticism?
I am not sure. What is your stance on humanism?I guess I am just anti-human?
They are relatively stable as Islamist movements tend to go. If anything, I think that we should encourage their relationship with the Supreme Leader of Iran, and we should court Iran as potential friend. This is my point of departure with the Israeli left, which is just as distrustful toward Iran as the US is.Neither is good. Hezbollah would never be accepted at the bargaining table.
Then specify, at least occasionally, that you are talking specifically about Netanyahu's right-wing coalition. If you don't like the Alignment or parts of the Alignment either, then specify them as well.I would have assumed that my posts were clear. That criticisms levelled at "Israel" were levelled at the Government.
You are missing the point.Ah, so we are in agreement then?
If the world "puts pressure" on Israel, then they would elect Yisrael Beiteinu as their majority party, and Yisrael Beiteinu would simply remove the Arabs from East Jerusalem entirely. Bye-bye, "Arabic squatters!"Quite the contrary. If the world puts pressure on Israel to adopt more humane practices, change can follow.
Then you should support the leader of the opposition. Her name is Livni.There is a vast amount of internal pressure from the left to push for change in policy that is driving the country into not only international disrepute, but also down a path no country wants to go down.
No. As long as people are criticizing the Israelies for being Jewish or for being Israelies, they will become defensive when criticized.The political right, in Israel, will always have a strong voice, simply because of the fear of Israelis. As long as any criticism is called anti-semitism, then there will always be a problem.
No. I am calling you an anti-semite because you are stirring up an irrational, emotional Judeophobia instead of talking about solutions, and you don't seem to care. You will not directly criticize any specific group among the Palestinians, and you refuse to be specific when you point fingers at the "Israeli government."I mean look at you? You're calling me an anti-semite because I criticise Israel's policies in the region.
Hohoho, bullshit.Israel, at the moment, is the darling child of the world.
"West," my left fucking nut. The only reason we can succeed in keeping the American government generally on the side of Israel is the fact that we have some fucking religious nuts here who believe that Israel is supposed to be some special "holy land" or something. Europe doesn't give two fucking hairy turds about Israel. The entire political left seems to have some stupid, ignorant fucking love affair with Hamas, and it is completely irrational.It is protected by the West out of fear of being accused of being anti-semitic.
Yeah, I heard you crying "white guilt" yards ago. It sounds as stupid now as it did then.Because any criticism is met with an accusation of anti-semitism.
I don't see what is wrong with Livni. She's a bit strong-arm for my liking, though.The last good leader Israel had was assassinated tragically. Rabin was the man who wanted to push for a solution and for that, he was killed.
Israel is not the problem. That fat-ass Netanyahu is the problem.So tell me, how are we meant to criticise Israel?
Excuse me?You mean be like you? A silent coward?
I am a very strong supporter of Kadima.
We are discussing specifics, so I am sated. Personally, my support for Kadima is nuanced, complex and critical. I think that many people in Kadima would be annoyed by some of the views that I hold. Well, tough shit for them: Israel must learn to get along with Iran, starting yesterday morning. On the other hand, I also maintain that they are the best hope for Israel-Palestine, and I feel that Livni is the hero that they need right now.But daring to criticise Lieberman's racist ideology is apparently anti-semitic.
Got me, lady. Talk to you later.So you're a guy? And?
Oh, KrazedKat thinks he's an expert on Jews because he was born Jewish. For religious reasons, he disagrees with Zionist philosophy and Jewish nationalism. There's a lot of them out there, you know. They aren't usually as vocal as this fellow, though. Normally, they are pretty retiring. Although I also disapprove of Zionist philosophy, I disapprove of it with different reason than KK. I also probably have a different concept of how it should be dismounted.It's no one's place except Jews to say what is or isn't a Jew.
Hasbara is under threat around the world like we haven't seen in some time. It's a fitting time to review some contemporary IsrApartheid talking-points, because they are going to be coming at us faster and more furiously now that their position is losing some of its balance both internally and in international support.
The talking points linked below start out quite admirably, in my view- but when it comes to understanding their neighbors and cousins, Israeli zionists are still in need of much orientation to their human surroundings. What do you think?