An ideology in and of itself without believers is like a dead unspoken language. If you felt the ideology dead you wouldn't care to discuss it at all, the only reason it interests you at all is because it is interpreted and adhered to by believers...the 'arms and legs' of any ideology.
So, if someone changes their ideologies, from Christianity to Islam, is that the same thing as getting a heart transplant, for example?
What? I comment and ask 'I don't understand how an athiest can pretend to know anything of what it means to live within the tenets of any religion, how do you pretend to know what that means in reality?' and you respond with ideology is separate from people?
I don't need to be steeped in a psychosis to understand the psychosis.
You called those who display a modern interpretation of their religion as 'pretending' and I questioned how anyone who doesn't practice nor believe in any religious belief can judge the sincerity of a believer. It seems you skirted the issue.
How is it that people are even allowed to re-interpret their religion, the word of their god, to suit their agendas? Isn't that hypocrisy?