James R:
mountainhare:“ I never claimed that people should not have sex, I pointed out that if they do have sex, they should be prepared to take care of the product of it. In otherwords, they should accept the consequences. If they aren't prepared to accept the inherent risk in having sex, then they shouldn't do so! ”
James R: That's all very well in an ideal, fluffy, conservative world. But our real world isn't like that.
In the real world, we don't expect individuals to take responsibility for their actions?! What the FUCK?! Have I woken up in the Twilight Zone?!
Oh, and I'm actually not a conservative (nor am I a liberal).
Your neighbour and yourself presumably have an equal right to life. Abortion, as I keep explaining, involves weighing up the interests of the mother against the interests of the foetus. Is that too difficult to understand?
No, it's not difficult to understand. Please don't patronize me, merely because I don't agree with your messed up worldview. You support the murder of an unborn child to improve the quality of life of the mother, who essentially chose to have sex in the first place. Where is the sense in that?
Oh wait, I forgot. You believe that the fetus magically transforms itself from a blob of cells into a human when it passes out of the magic hole. Never mind.
What percentage of sex acts are undertaken with the intent to have a child, do you think? Essentially, you are advocating abolishing sex, except for conception.
Wrong again! Why do liberal retards continually spew these straw man arguments?!
Quite simply, anyone is welcome to have unprotected sex. However, if they happen to produce a child, bad luck. The couple knew that there is always the risk that if you have sex, the woman will become pregnant. Ergo, don't cry 'foul' when the woman falls pregnant, even if you didn't 'intend' for it to happen. Take responsibility for your actions, instead of killing your responsibility.
You really have no clue about how people behave.
And how did you arrive at this judgement? Oh wait, I forgot, couples which don't have sex before marriage don't exist in liberal dumbfuck land. They are mythical creatures, like unicorns, leprechauns, and the brain of a liberal.
In fact, I doubt you apply your own advice to yourself.
So now you are calling me a liar? This gets better and better. The last time you engaged in character assassination (against Happeh), you got your ass handed to you with garnish and condiments. Are you sure that you want to start round 2 against another poster who knows how to hold his own in a debate?
That's if you have a partner, which is doubtful with those kinds of attitudes.
What's wrong with my attitude? You mean the attitude where I take responsibility for my actions? Or the attitude where I realize that sex = preggers? Or the attitude that I shouldn't risk getting a woman preggers, because I'm not capable of looking after a child?