nobody has refuted this eitherJames R said:Abortions will happen, regardless of whether they are legal or not. If women cannot access legal abortions, some will resort to dangerous, illegal procedures. This is historical fact.
nobody has refuted this eitherJames R said:Abortions will happen, regardless of whether they are legal or not. If women cannot access legal abortions, some will resort to dangerous, illegal procedures. This is historical fact.
leopold99 said:i don't think anyone refuted this
leopold99 said:nobody has refuted this either
I never claimed that people should not have sex, I pointed out that if they do have sex, they should be prepared to take care of the product of it. In otherwords, they should accept the consequences. If they aren't prepared to accept the inherent risk in having sex, then they shouldn't do so!
You call murdering an unborn baby a 'solution'? The typical twisted liberal mindset in action. If we were to apply their rationale consistently, I would have the right to murder a neighbour who was giving me problems. After all, murder is a great 'solution' to my 'problem'.
Quite simply, if you aren't prepared to either...
1. Raise a child
or...
2. Put the child up for adoption.
Then you shouldn't have sex!
Perhaps instead of engaging in murder, a couple would be better off keeping their pants on until they know that they can support, or put up for adoption, the product of their procreation. If they feel real horny, there is plenty of stuff they could do with each other that doesn't involve baby making. Oral, anal, and hand jobs don't produce children (although I have heard reports that anal sex can produce liberals and neo-cons!). If they get real desperate, there are always sex toys, vibrators, etc. And sometimes it never hurts to fall back on good ole self-satisifaction. I'm sure Adam used his hand before Eve was created!
leopold99 said:sure they have been responded to
but they have not been refuted (proven false)
leopold99 said:men are more responsible for children than women
abortions (induced) will happen regardless
QuarkMoon said:James R said:All kinds of reasons. Let me give you one common situation as an example.
Common? How do you know that? I would say that kind if situation is quite rare...
She shouldn't have had unprotected sex in the first place, circumstances are no excuse, unless she was piss drunk and the guy forced himself onto her, which would be considered rape.
She could take 2 semesters off from school (6 months; 3 semesters if she wants to stretch it - 9 months off from school is not the end of the world), and return after giving the baby up for adoption.
And you continue to try and argue morality and psychological affects between abortion and adoption! Abortion is the termination of your future child, adoption allows your child to live his/her life to their full potential. Termination vs adoption, yeah, adoption please. And until you can show me a study that shows adoption is more traumatizing then abortion, you can go ahead and drop this argument.
She does not have to support the child either, put him/her up for adoption so that child will have a chance at life.
And if I were the father, of course I would be reponsible.
However, I'm smart enough not to have unprotected sex when I'm not ready (I would rather finish college first). See, it's as simple as that. That's why I have never had to address the problem before, because I don't have unprotected sex!
It's called responsibility, it's called accountability. If a women is having consensual sex, they have to be responsible for the results. They have to be held accountable for their choices.
Look at the numbers of abortions before it was legal, the number has jumped exponentially. In fact, in the first year of legality in 1973, there were 774,600. In 2001 it has jumped to 1.31 million abortions performed (I can't find any more recent statistics, but trends show that abortions are decreasing by about 0.1% per year).
the same can be applied to both sexesQuarkMoon said:The women chooses to have consensual sex, the women chooses not to take birth control pills, the women chooses to have sex when she knows she is not ready for children, the women chooses to take the chance of pregnancy instead of using protection. Um, yeah, looks to me like she is just as responsible as the man.
i expicitly stated in one of my posts "that it should be stressed that abortions are not a cure for pregnancy"QuarkMoon said:And this nonsense of women accidently getting pregnant once, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute 47% of abortions are performed on women who have already had one or more abortions.
James R said:Then you'd be wrong.
I said she was drunk. Is she still at fault? What about the man? Does he take ANY blame in this situation? Or are all men absolved of all responsibility for pregnancy, according to you?
And what if this was a "date rape" situation? That's common enough, and many such events are not reported, for many reasons.
Yes, she could. And you want to tell her she must, despite whatever her wishes may be.
I doubt you'd change your mind if I presented a study which showed that adoption was more traumatic for the mother than abortion. Would you?
Again, you completely disregard the interests of the mother in favour of the interests of the child. Why are you so keen to treat the mother as if she doesn't exist? Is this your general approach to women?
It's very easy to make that kind of statement in the abstract. The fact is, nobody knows what you'd do if you were actually confronted with such a decision. As I said before, it's all care and no responsibility for your conservative men.
That's you. That's fine for you. You are quite free to live a celibate life and only ever have sex to procreate. No sex before marriage for Quarkmoon! Ok.
Now, explain it to me again. What gives you the right to tell other people how to live their lives?
You don't think having to face an agonisingly difficult decision like this is accountable enough? Of course not. You want to be moral policeman, on an issue you personally will never face.
How noble of you.
leopold99 said:you say that you have protected sex
has the thought ever occure to you that the condom might break?
i can honestly say it was on the females mind.
James R said:What did you expect? Before abortion was legalised, ALL abortions were illegal, and hence unrecorded in official statistics.
In the years it has been legalised, 2 things have happened:
1. Fewer and fewer illegal abortions, as safe abortion has become more readily available.
2. Population has increased.
leopold99 said:two questions
who should use birth control pills?
what happens when "accidents" do occur?
birth control pills alter a females body chemistry, is that fair?QuarkMoon said:If two consensual partners want to have sex before they are ready to raise a child, then the women should use the birth control pills (obviously) and the man should use condoms.
leopold99 said:birth control pills alter a females body chemistry, is that fair?
condoms do nothing but sit there like a sock, is that fair?
about adoptions
have you considered the worlds population?
what solution would you propose to keep our numbers in check?