We each have our beliefs about the world and what we believe to be real which I expect must define how we view the opinions of others.
We each will claim our subjective reality is an objective reality but reality I feel can only be subjective.
Two people can view the same data but each can will interprete the data differently.
Science uses rules to greatly limit the variation between views upon the interpretation of data so if two people use the same ruler their interpretation will seem to be the same.
However if they come from different countries they may interprete that same measurement differently. And so I may say I own a 150 mm telescope because I live in a country that uses a metric system and yet my friend in the USA will say I own a 6 inch telescope.
We both are correct but even with a matter of measurement we each work within a different reality and it would seem even a matter of measurement becomes a subjective reality even when all will say measurement can only be objective.
Reality can only be a personal experience and therefore subjective in all cases.
We can talk of an objective reality but it is something each of us can not know as we can only view that presumed reality subjectively.
My reality is subjective as is Jan's reality as is everyones reality.
So I view the world thru my reality glasses and see a certain reality and Jan views the world through (his or her) reality glasses and sees a different reality.
Neither of those realities can be said to be objective even if each person feels strongly that their reality is the real and correct one.
Each of us can only work with a subjective reality.
So when two people get to argue they can only argue their subjective reality against the other persons subjective reality but understandably each will believe their subjective reality is the one true so called objective reality.
My reality has no god in any shape or form and in my reality it is simply nonsence to say I am without god, or that god is.... indeed to say anything that suggests my reality includes a god or even the slightest recognition of a god I can and regard as nonsence... That is my subjective reality.
Jan has a different reality, still subjective, but it is different to mine.
And so Jan's subjective reality has a god and to suggest there is no god is simply nonsence.
To qualify an atheist Jans approach can only be to say an atheist is without god because his subjective reality does not entertain a universe where god is not present.
So each of us will accuse the other of repetion in our arguement, mine being the scriptures are made up and Jan that god is...
I can't. imagine either of our realities can ever meet.
So this means I will be offended when Jan says that I am without god and Jan will be offended when I offer a definition from a dictionary hinting there are people for whom god does not exist.
And yet knowing we each only enjoy a subjective reality we argue that ours is the one true objective reality.
And that is crazy for only one of us can be right and thats me... at least we each think that.
Alex
Your post was to long to pick apart in segments
Here is my take on it as a whole
Telescope measurement
OBJECTIVE just different names
You in the no god group OBJECTIVE
Those in the god group OBJECTIVE in the real world
BUT in their pretzel brain imagine a
SUBJECTIVE world is also OBJECTIVE REAL
If you are on the slippery slide of thinking
does reality exist?
or is everything SUBJECTIVE?
try living in a SUBJECTIVE house eating SUBJECTIVE food etc etc
REALITY is REALITY
WE (atheists and thesist) can impose as much SUBJUNCTIVITY (is that a word?) on
REALITY as we like but REALITY will remain just that - REALITY
god either exist or not
Humpty Dumpty definition coming up
exist = has OBJECTIVE REALITY in a REAL world sense
god exist under this definetion? NO
Does god exist under SUBJECTIVE rules?
I would contend NO
BUT believers in god BELIEVE he does
Which is why all religions operate as belief systems
And to mangle from Forest Gump
"That's not all I have to say about that"