I'm a Christian, flame me.

mcflytrap, I hate to tell you this, but everything people report from supposed "exorcisms" is most likely just hysterical reactions. People getting stigmata, causing wounds to appear through muscular contractions, changing their voice, all caused by the subconscious mind of a severely disturbed person. No demons, no spooky fairies and trolls and other mythological bogeymen. Just psychological problems.

http://www.saybrook.edu/app/lg/cr3080.asp

You can probably find more all over the web. But it's better to just read about it in a psyche textbook or something.

And yes, if you talk to your god and hear a response, you most likely either have a healthy imagination and an inability to discern it as such, or you have some sort of psychological problem. Not saying that is the cause, but they are the most likely reasons.
 
Originally posted by Adam
mcflytrap, I hate to tell you this, but everything people report from supposed "exorcisms" is most likely just hysterical reactions. People getting stigmata, causing wounds to appear through muscular contractions, changing their voice, all caused by the subconscious mind of a severely disturbed person. No demons, no spooky fairies and trolls and other mythological bogeymen. Just psychological problems.

http://www.saybrook.edu/app/lg/cr3080.asp

You can probably find more all over the web. But it's better to just read about it in a psyche textbook or something.

And yes, if you talk to your god and hear a response, you most likely either have a healthy imagination and an inability to discern it as such, or you have some sort of psychological problem. Not saying that is the cause, but they are the most likely reasons.

Sorry I was going to stay away but I crept right in. A little forewarning, I may not get in here much in the future. I'm just too busy to debate.

I still can't believe you are telling me that wounds appearing out of nowhere and voices coming from the sky are all my imagination. YOU were not there, you really have no valid say in anything to this nature. I suppose someone speaking in a language totally unknown to them (like Latin) was just a muscular contraction.

Call me crazy, but I am completely and 100% sane. It's so laughable that even after I present you with something that disproves all your little theories, you still insist on everything I'm telling you is made up. Dude, no offense but you're coming across desperate and willing to pull anything out of your head to explain why and how I talk to God.

God has even referred to certain areas of scripture that I've never read, and just so happened to pertain to the situation I was going through. Is this another one of your muscular contractions?

Har!

Quick edit: I forgot to mention that after my dad cast out the demon the girl was fine, thank God. This was over 8 years ago. To this day she's had no sign of mental illness or anything of the like. Doesn't really sound like a mentally disturbed person to me.

-mcfly-
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by LIGHTBEING
Well, you are the one that asked to be flamed. Also, this isn't the first time a Christian has ran away from my questions. It is becoming a typical Christians response. I am getting used to it. This is a message board, why would we debate through email? Most of these question are legitimate, it is obvious to me that you are just turning your cheek.

It's no problem...I'm not getting mad or anything, just a little weary when the next time I'm able to log in there are 3 pages waiting for me. I just don't have the energy to sift thru it all.

I don't consider bowing out of a debate running away. My faith lies in God's love, and no good has ever come of people arguing back and forth. I just have to trust that somewhere and somehow you'll see this and come to the Lord. It's not something that is explainable or understandable, but when you experience His power...you will know.

I AM planning on quitting this forum altogether, like I said. I came around to see what the place was like, but it's really not what I'm looking for. No offense to any of you, though. I will pop back in, maybe, from day to day out of curiosity (we can't all be perfect!) but I doubt I'll be able to respond to everything.

The reason I invited you to e-mail me was because of my past experiences with internet debates. Almost anyone will come onto a forum and debate away...whether they really are interested in the topic or not. But I've noticed that only the really serious ones will bother to e-mail me...and I know that whatever they say comes from the heart, whether it be inflammatory or otherwise. It also gives the participants more time and less stress to respond to e-mails. I would much rather have 3 or 4 ongoing discussions via e-mail than 20 or 30 people shouting at me about how "blind" I am.

Anyway, this has gotten long enough. I hope you guys can somewhat understand where I am coming from. We don't all have to agree religiously, but I hope we can at least respect each other and their wishes (ie: no serious flames).

-mcfly-
 
mcflytrap, I never suggested it was all made up imaginary stuff. Only that it was a very basic and well-understood psychological problem. And there is a reason why psychologists don't like eye-witness testimony being useds in courts. Witnesses interpret things based on what they want to believe or what they fear to be so. I suspect what you saw was simply the psychological problem mentioned, enhanced or altered in your perceptions by what you expected to see/hear. And I am sorry if hundreds of years of psychology seems like hogwash to you, but there is a great deal of research and observation behind all this. I know people don't like to believe that what they think is unreal, that it was coloured by their own preconceptions. But that is the most likely probability. Most likely you saw a well-understood psychological problem, your subconscious expected to see/hear certain things, and whatever the subject did/said was coloured by those expectations. And of course you would not remember it that way, you would remember only what you percieved, not what happened. And yes, there is such a thing as group hysteria.
 
Originally posted by Xev
Hey come on! I was teasing.

Sorry if you took it personally :rolleyes:

"Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke"

*Shrugs* Leave, stay, whatever.

I'm planning on severely cutting my time here....maybe even permanently leaving (we'll see). But it really has nothing to do with what anyone said to me. I just don't have the debate in me anymore.

Like mentioned in an earlier post, I am always willing to talk via e-mail. I know that each one of you feels a void in life...something that you just can't quite place. I believe God put that void there so we would search for Him. You won't fill it with drugs, alcohol, or even a PHD....that void can only be filled by God's love.

If someone were to e-mail me, they have my guarantee I would be completely respectful in anything and everything I say. I can respect the way others feel, but it also hurts me to see so many lost people. People may say this lightly, but it's the truth with me. I physically hurt for those that are so dead set against anything about God. God has given me this desire to help those that are lost...and I only wish that I can fulfill His plan for me.

Sorry for babbling....it just keeps entering my brain. ;)

-mcfly-
 
Originally posted by Adam
mcflytrap, I never suggested it was all made up imaginary stuff. Only that it was a very basic and well-understood psychological problem. And there is a reason why psychologists don't like eye-witness testimony being useds in courts. Witnesses interpret things based on what they want to believe or what they fear to be so. I suspect what you saw was simply the psychological problem mentioned, enhanced or altered in your perceptions by what you expected to see/hear. And I am sorry if hundreds of years of psychology seems like hogwash to you, but there is a great deal of research and observation behind all this. I know people don't like to believe that what they think is unreal, that it was coloured by their own preconceptions. But that is the most likely probability. Most likely you saw a well-understood psychological problem, your subconscious expected to see/hear certain things, and whatever the subject did/said was coloured by those expectations. And of course you would not remember it that way, you would remember only what you percieved, not what happened. And yes, there is such a thing as group hysteria.

I respect your thoughts on this issue, but I don't see how they are valid in my case. Scientists have more of an agenda than anyone I have ever known. Science can "prove" or "disprove" anything they feel like. Why? By manipulating the facts and drawing "hypothesis". Science (in some cases) is no more accurate than drawing tarot cards. I know quite a few people miraculously healed when their church family prayed for them. The doctors were baffled. Was this recorded in their notebooks? No. Was this written down in text for other doctors to study? No. Why? Agendas. You know only what these people want you to know. I wonder how much evidence these scientists have come across that they don't understand, yet refuse to admit and thus make no mention of it in their wonderful books.

I will agree that most people have hidden and sometimes subconscious agendas. Put a group of Christians in a room and show them a magic trick, they may be more proned to think it was a mircale. But put scientists in a room and show them a man raised from the dead by a touch of the hand, and they will insist it's all dimensia (sp?).

Main point: Agendas are like our noses. We've all got them. The best thing to do is try to look at things from a fresh start...and that is something I try to do.

On a sidenote, do you know how many completely unbelieving and unwilling people have walked into our church and walked out (some time later maybe) a born-again believer? I couldn't begin to name them all. Maybe their wives or husbands dragged them to church...maybe their kids....maybe it was Easter Sunday and they felt obligated. Either way, they definately had no intentions of letting the Lord pull at their heart...and wanted to disbelieve everything they saw and heard. There names are now written in the book of life.

No agendas there.

-mcfly-
 
Very odd thing to say. You know there is a void in my life? How do you know? Seems to me that what you are feeling is not about anyone else, but about your own desire to tell people what you belief and have them agree with you. As far as I am aware, there is no void in my life. But I guess you know me better than I do, right?
 
Originally posted by Adam
Very odd thing to say. You know there is a void in my life? How do you know? Seems to me that what you are feeling is not about anyone else, but about your own desire to tell people what you belief and have them agree with you. As far as I am aware, there is no void in my life. But I guess you know me better than I do, right?

So tell me, what's the meaning of life?
 
Originally posted by mcflytrap

I will agree that most people have hidden and sometimes subconscious agendas. Put a group of Christians in a room and show them a magic trick, they may be more proned to think it was a mircale. But put scientists in a room and show them a man raised from the dead by a touch of the hand, and they will insist it's all dimensia (sp?).

I think you've been dealing with the wrong people. No scientist I have ever met would insist it is dementia. More likely they would start pulling everything apart to see why the body stood up. That right there is what a scientist is about: having questions, not answers.
 
Originally posted by Adam

I think you've been dealing with the wrong people. No scientist I have ever met would insist it is dementia. More likely they would start pulling everything apart to see why the body stood up. That right there is what a scientist is about: having questions, not answers.

What exactly they would say isn't really important. My main point was they'd think of anything they possibly could to support how they see the world. It's all about agendas.
 
What is the meaning of life? If there is a meaning to life, I think it is probably different for everyone. As for me, well, I have no idea.

But personally, I suspect the people who claim to have answers to these questions are either selling something or they are plain old dangerous. That is one rule of thumb I tend to follow as often as possible: if you have more answers than questions, you're probably nuts.

<---Answers=Foolish-----------------|---------------Questions=Wise-->

A bit of a scale, or compass. Not black and white, but a general idea of what I think of this matter. To me, anyone on the right-hand-side of the mid-point there is probably okay. More questions than answers is a good thing.
 
Originally posted by mcflytrap


What exactly they would say isn't really important. My main point was they'd think of anything they possibly could to support how they see the world. It's all about agendas.

No, you missed the point entirely. A true scientist keeps in mind the possibility that it is a divine event, but refuses to commit to an answer until there is evidence to support something.
 
Originally posted by Adam
What is the meaning of life? If there is a meaning to life, I think it is probably different for everyone. As for me, well, I have no idea.

But personally, I suspect the people who claim to have answers to these questions are either selling something or they are plain old dangerous. That is one rule of thumb I tend to follow as often as possible: if you have more answers than questions, you're probably nuts.

<---Answers=Foolish-----------------|---------------Questions=Wise-->

A bit of a scale, or compass. Not black and white, but a general idea of what I think of this matter. To me, anyone on the right-hand-side of the mid-point there is probably okay. More questions than answers is a good thing.

I gain nothing from your salvation except happiness. I will tell you w/out a doubt that the meaning of life is to serve the Lord, and to bring others to Him so that they may be with Him in Heaven. True happiness can only be found in Him. You won't know until you experience it.

Believe me, I ask plenty of questions myself. I didn't always believe w/out a doubt.

-mcfly-
 
Originally posted by Adam


No, you missed the point entirely. A true scientist keeps in mind the possibility that it is a divine event, but refuses to commit to an answer until there is evidence to support something.

I see our main difference. I just flat out disagree. In my experience, I've never known a scientist or a doctor to be open to anything aside from what he/she wants to believe. If they were, they were lead to salvation.

-mcfly-
 
I know that each one of you feels a void in life...something that you just can't quite place.

Why gee thanks, Tyler Durden.

I thought we were not supposed to talk about fight club?

You won't fill it with drugs, alcohol, or even a PHD....that void can only be filled by God's love.

Could we fill it with cement?

but it also hurts me to see so many lost people.

How can you see them if they are lost? :D

So tell me, what's the meaning of life?

There is no meaning save what we give it.
 
Ok, I'm at work right now...which means I MUST get things done. I can't guarantee I can read all your responses, so like previously stated, if there is something you'd really like me to read and consider...e-mail me at "mcflytrap@hotmail.com". I can assure you I will respond.

-mcfly-
 
Originally posted by mcflytrap

I will tell you w/out a doubt that the meaning of life is to serve the Lord...

To serve is not divine, holy, or even human, in any way, ever, for any reason or belief. Freedom is our divine right. Not service. There is not one creature in this universe or any other who is above me and worthy of my service.
 
Well, be fair, the guy may actually have work to do, unlike lazy-arse uni student bums like me. :)
 
Well, not has to work, but wants to. None of us have to do these things. It's a choice.
 
Hmmm ... most interesting

quote:

Originally posted by mcflytrap

I will tell you w/out a doubt that the meaning of life is to serve the Lord...


To serve is not divine, holy, or even human, in any way, ever, for any reason or belief. Freedom is our divine right. Not service. There is not one creature in this universe or any other who is above me and worthy of my service.
I had to sound off on this.

At my harshest, I would say that this is exactly the problem in the world. But I think I understand at least part of the point.

Living one's life to "serve the Lord" is a cop-out, imho. It is placing trust in an object of faith in lieu of dealing directly with the world around you. To say that it brings to mind the notion that people are not worth anything to one another is to observe a truism. If one is "serving the Lord" consciously, what is the alternative? Is the only reason one is of service to another to impress ahd glorify the Lord?

To the other ... Adam ... I hope you're not married ;)

My advocacy of service comes from a very socialist-sounding point. Thus, to work in that mode for a moment, for analogy: To serve oneself in the capitalistic manner seems well and fine, though I do admit that it appears to lead to that form of materialism which few of us consider a legitimate philosophy. In the end, how capitalist can one be? One must, at some point, allow other people to have capital in order to have capital to collect. In terms of service and the spiritual sense, I turn to Thelema: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.

Does this creed license outright selfishness and hedonism? It has traditionally, much in the same way other religious ideas have licensed their negative aspects--the uneducated who consciously applies Thelema, for instance, is the same as the uneducated capitalist. Just as the uneducated capitalist runs the risk of applying capitalist theories in such a manner that they be detrimental, so, too, do Thelema's adherents frequently suffer bouts of self-detriment.

Comparing Thelema to the Witches' Rede: An thou harm none, do what thou will. Here we have an intrinsic safety net, a direct-order, inasmuch as Wicca orders anything, to play nice.

To serve someone under either of these principles is not inherent in observing them. Rather, the notion of service arises from the perspective that lack causes harm, and service can take the form of prevention of lack. Thus, like Christians or Communists, under the idea of the Rede or the Law of Thelema one would serve another in order to prevent lack, prevent harm, and allow oneself to do what one will.

To eliminate economic theory and religion from it altogether: to serve others is to make sure that your community is capable of allowing liberty and freedom. The '94 Republican Revolution killed some intriguing federal programs, though I admit they probably shouldn't have been federal. Among those was Midnight Basketball, the practice of opening up lit, indoor basketball courts to urban youths so that they had something other than drugs, sex, and violence to attend to at night. All federal arguments aside, what happened when people chose to serve their communities in such a manner as to provide basketball facilities is that juvenile violent crime dropped on average by 1/3. Score one for the community. To inject economics back into it, you now have 1/3 fewer potential muggers than you did yesterday, so to speak. Your pocketbook and vitality are 33% safer.

To take a small story from my own personal files: One day I'm sitting outside, eating lunch, and suddenly a girl sits down next to me. "Can I have some fries?" she asks. Now, the standard answer here, I suppose, is F--k off, but it seemed to me that this mere child would not be asking were it not necessary. In Seattle, people don't bug strangers like that just for the heck of it. We bug strangers, but not like that. To this day, I have no idea why me--she'd had one hell of a last 24 hours insofar as I can tell. Methamphetamine shakes, a specific look in her eye that scares the hell out of me to see in a human being--what the hell happened to make them so frightened? And yet ....

In the end, some french fries, a couple of bucks worth of gas to give her a ride, and thirty minutes out of my day to get her to her grandmother's house for safety's sake--we can't have her staying on the streets--seemed like a fair trade so that I don't have to pay to keep her in a public shelter, don't have to pay in terms of the cops cleaning her corpse off the streets, and don't have to pay in terms of my city having to prosecute and jail her for stealing to eat, hooking, running crank, &c.

It wasn't that much to do ... but a lot of things got brighter that day.

And this, I submit, is the value of service unto others.

Service to the Lord? F--k that, it's just another form of duplicitous greed. I have no problem with honest greed.

But it seems that humans have decided to come together in society; we owe it to ourselves to make the best of it, greedy or not.

Two cents and then some ...

thanx,
Tiassa :cool:

(No! Kitty! Them's my french fries!)
 
Back
Top