I did provide the details of the event, but I see you are much more concerned about ridiculing my comments concerning Duke university, and you write a grand epistle to this effect with out any comment at all on the details I gave you concerning Ken.
What you gave me was yet another story. While you told me your friend was one of very few white Indians and that the plane crashed in a jungle in Troy, it is nothing but another unsubstantiated story, so vague in details that anyone could have made it up with 2 minutes effort. At least give me the date this happened so I can check news reports for the area.
For some reason you don't seem to understand what I'm asking for. Why you're giving me this man's family tree is beyond me. Why do you think telling me he's a descendant of some Welsh prince is of any relevance? Or that he's given up ouija because of demon possession?
They are not relevant details. Ok, you've narrowed down the location, now you just need to give details that provide some actual evidence.
It is insanely funny to see you now whinging that I was more concerned about the Duke, when just a couple of posts ago
you were the one telling me:
"It's relevant, *get it?* *get it?* let me get that through the thick head of yours, it's relevant *get it?*"
And now here you are proving my point that it fucking isn't relevant. As a result, I'm wondering why you bothered bringing it up in the first place when all I bloody well asked for was some details regarding Ken and the crashed aircraft.
Now, I'm going to keep this very simple for you: Provide some evidence concerning your grandiose story. Telling me you've spoken to Ken is of no value and does not count as evidence, but just another claim. Give me the date this happend. The very day. That way I can check the news reports for that week. Give me the name of the place he took off from so I can check whether on so and so date a drunk man took off in his private airplane and then crashed. Give me the pilots name so I can check for "[name] dies in airplane crash" with the local tabloids, can check to see if there was a search party and if any of them have heard of Ken.
Do you understand what I mean by details?
How do you feel about handing out your personal details?
As a hobby I enter competitions - both online and offline, and so hand my details out on a regular basis. I am not asking for credit card numbers, nor am I actually that concerned right now with Ken's real name. I am certain that the dead pilot will not mind you giving me the date this happened, the names of local papers and places he could have taken off from.
Nor would it be too much to ask for transcripts of the ouija event. You used that in your original story to try and give it some support. You said: "Ken makes transcripts which shows what happened", and the minute I ask for them, or say I will happily buy him a digital video camera you do a quick turnaround and say: "he doesn't have them and doesn't do ouija anymore because of demons". This is a prime example of how a person covers up for their lies. It's very common for people to do.
Sure, you could be telling the truth, but then it isn't that hard to provide details slightly more relevant than who Ken's great great great .... grandfather was.
You merely refer to yourself as "Snake Lord." Talk about a cop-out, geez!
I'm sorry, other than some childish attempt at insult, I can't quite figure what your quote means. Still, anything that avoids you having to provide actual details.. right?
Are you going to subject Ken to the same treatment I'm getting?
What treatment is that exactly? Pointing out the irrelevancy of Duke, then listening to you call me thick, only to then tell me the irrelevancy of Duke when I start talking about him? Or listening to you bust my nuts over your personal inaccuracy concerning psychology and parapsychology, and telling me that I
must like so and so or I'm a fake, or I must know the name of a psychologist living in Timbuktoo or I know nothing and so on, while the entire time, from my first post, I have simply asked that you provide some evidence concerning your story.
I can understand this supposed friend of yours being a bit shy about giving his last name over the internet, but newspapers, airports, and the like have no such problem.
If so, then Ken is worth more to me as a friend than you are as a flippant atheist, and we will just forget the whole thing.
Who's in 'roadblock' mode? All I have asked for is some evidence. You sort of obliged, giving me Ken's ancestral history and skin colour, but I need slightly more than that. Newspapers, exact dates, and airports is a start.
You arent' going to believe him anyway.
Without evidence of course not. That's why I'm asking for evidence. Understand yet?
When a plane crashes, there are reports made about it. Newspapers, rescue services, police, obituaries and so on. I do not care that Ken is a white red indian.
He has done a lot more than this one "grandiose" event, as you call it. I call it no big deal compared to other things I've experienced:
Ah, the grand escape. Swipe the story off as not that important and move right on to the next one... Typical.
Of course your next 'story' contains yet another clause whereby you can get out of having to substantiate it:
This group of demons once possessed the maniac at Gadera. It is on video, but don't expect to get a copy -- it is not here for your entertainment or to make a buck.
Now tell me, you obnoxious little child, where have I once even hinted that I would want a video that apparently contains evidence for entertainment or monetary issues? I ask you to back up your stories so I can see that it's true, and yet with some ignorant audacity you dare try and lump your inabilities on me. If it's on video give or sell me a copy, or just tell me who I can talk to to get one. That way your story would be seen to be true and the whole issue is solved. But you are very quickly looking all the more like a liar.
While that does me no harm whatsoever, look into yourself and see what you have become.
I know a place where humans are sacrificed in satanic rituals underneath a lake, and there are several other people that know the same. It packs out with some of the city's best and brightest on halloween, and the police are part of it. When the ceremony goes on, lightning comes down from the sky and strikes the center of the lake on a continuous basis. I have seen satanic monks disappear in thin air. Other people have witnessed strange things with them too.
Where? Saying: "I know a place" is not sufficient. You know that already. Oh let me guess, you think the place would be offended if you gave it's name?
Am I totally blowing your mind? Probably so.
Get off the drugs. What you are doing is showing the world that you're full of shit. I have no doubt "Ken" refers to the boyfriend of your daughters barbie doll, and that this place of satanic rituals is actually something you saw on the X-Files. If I'm wrong, then it isn't hard to prove I'm wrong.
If you start to believe, then these perverted examples of "spirituality" bring you to God.
How in the world do you make that conclusion? Let's say for arguments sake that ouija boards do actually contact spirits of the dead. That would imply that they're not in heaven, and they're not in hell and that when someone dies they waft around aimlessly doing bugger all as opposed to being in a wonderful environment in space. Ghosts and the like do more to go against the existence of your god than support it. It's along the same lines of saying the Loch Ness monster would bring a person closer to god. Don't be silly.
This is not God's way of bringing believers to him, rather it is a way to glorify Satan, which I have no desire to do. I am quickly tiring of this subject.
Well then
you shouldn't have started it then. Of course it's no surprise to see you tiring of it when someone asks you to actually provide evidence. But no, you then get a brand new lease of life and off you go again with a brand new story, which you'll also get tired of now that I have asked for evidence. This will continue onwards with you thinking you can backup one fuck up with another fuck up.
He started the school in 1927, do you think he sits around and drinks wine? He's been dead for years.
While that's certainly interesting, it isn't relevant here.
----------
d)))errrm, have you not read any overview of the revolutionary developments of modern physics.....which began proper in the early years of last century??
Like I said, I don't really have any interest in physics. While I know I went through the routines at school, I haven't bothered with it since then.
d)))no. lets keep it simple. they found that subatomic reality is weird. that it confounds CLASSICAL physics' assumptionss about reality, in its either/or mode. so, for example it's been found that a contituent of this subatomic reality, a 'particle' can be both a wave and a particle. you've not heard of this?
For the third time: I'm really have little interest in physics and haven't paid any real attention to it since I was in school.
d)))well i am not talkin about a banana on Uranus am i? that's your presumptious reponse to what i am try to ask you. This what i am no about is coming from THe most
physicalist of physcial sciences, 'physics', who were very perturbed by ye reality they found in what is now known as 'quantum reality'.
Well my apologies.
1) The very first response I made to you was that: "I don't know what you're going on about", which in itself would make an adequate answer hard to achieve. I tried what I could based upon several factors. Your post to me, if you go back up and look, seems so out of place in the thread that I could only guess at it's reason and relevance. As Woody and I were kind of in a discussion about "weird" stuff like ghosts and spirits, and you had then said "reality might be weirder than you think", I was drawn to the notion that you were advocating the existence of ghosts and spirits and other weird entities based on the topic of discussion, while using physics as some kind of analogy to support the idea.
2) I still don't know what you're going on about.
Lucky I asked then.
It answers it in regards i see moe and more whee your worldview is coming from
Why of course, you know me well. 3 posts to each other is all it takes these days.
