and2000X,
ANS: I'll be sure to check in and have that done.
Some here don't like it but it actually seems rather simple.
Where "0" represents "Nothingness"
0---------->(+n)+(-n). that is mathematically you can bifurcate "0" into two opposites entities of "Somethingness" and not violate any conservation principles.
You also do that without requiring a God. It hasn't been here for eternity or infinite time, that still requires a point of creation some infinite amount of time ago. Those are no answers.
The above seems a logical answer. It also sounds a great deal simular to a fluctuation.
Persol's "Flux" would not be "Nothing". The absence of time and space is "Nothing".
Knowing to believe only half of
what you hear is a sign of
intelligence. Knowing which
half to believe will make you a
genius.
Until you have actually observed 'nothing' (which you can't), I wouldn't postulate it. Anyone who claims that everything came from nothing ought to get their head checked.
ANS: I'll be sure to check in and have that done.
Some here don't like it but it actually seems rather simple.
Where "0" represents "Nothingness"
0---------->(+n)+(-n). that is mathematically you can bifurcate "0" into two opposites entities of "Somethingness" and not violate any conservation principles.
You also do that without requiring a God. It hasn't been here for eternity or infinite time, that still requires a point of creation some infinite amount of time ago. Those are no answers.
The above seems a logical answer. It also sounds a great deal simular to a fluctuation.
Persol's "Flux" would not be "Nothing". The absence of time and space is "Nothing".
Knowing to believe only half of
what you hear is a sign of
intelligence. Knowing which
half to believe will make you a
genius.