Trilairian
Registered Senior Member
No, I proved you wrong. You are the one using your delusional heart rather than your analytical mind. Accept the fact and move on.Nisus said:The only thing you continue to prove is how blind your mind is....
That's right, you were proven wrong so don't.VitalOne said:There is no point to me arguing anymore.
Who said you could miss quote me?Your argument has become if you cannot find a poll, that makes you 100% wrong. Oh yeah, according to you, information in Encyclopedias are purely opinions.
No, you lost the argument completely so there is no point in you replying to this topic anymore.You and Medicine Woman have lost the argument completely, there's no point in me replying to this topic anymore.
You don't have any. There are no records of anyone contemporary to Jesus saying that they even heard of him. If you have any such source I would like to see it. As yet you have given none and in all the research I have done I have found none. The closest thing you have is the new testament written way after the alleged events by who knows who.Medicine Woman clearly states that Jesus never existed but has nothing to say about my quoted sources.
The evidence is there, you just refuse to look at it.She just states things without any evidence to back it up. When a theist does that everyone jumps on their case.
Sources, and you haven't debunked a single one of them. They debunked your religion.You say you have a weight load of evidence, but I clearly debunked your source and pointed out the biased in it.
Where is the poll? Without one that most statement is nothing more than the authors opinion. Wiki like the bible is not the word of God.It's no wonder that wikipedia says
"However, there is much more to both deities than this, and so such basic comparisons are not terribly persuasive to most academics" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horus#Horus_and_Jesus
Don't lie you yourself. You even yourself take my valid argument which isn't BS very seriously otherwise we wouldn't still be arguing about this.No one takes your BS seriously.
Sarcasm is not a valid argument. Don't twist what I said.But ofcourse, if I have Encyclopedias that say that, the Encyclopedias are just opinions.
No, you lost and you still have provided no poll to validate that ridiculous statement. And I don't believe you are honest when you say you are done.Well I'm done with this debate, you've plainly lost. The fact is that the majority of scholars who may well believe that myth is tied to Jesus still uphold that Jesus was some type of historical figure who really existed.