Horus--Jesus--Buddha, same origin??

Do you think Buddha, and Jesus were inspired from Egyptian Mythology?

  • I believe so, yes.

    Votes: 9 23.7%
  • No, there is enough evidence, that these figures existed independantly.

    Votes: 29 76.3%

  • Total voters
    38
wow this is a zombie thread it keeps coming back to life :D Three times now. I suppose it shows its an interesting topic.
 
Gday,



JOSEPHUS (c.96CE)

The famous Testamonium Flavianum (the T.F.) in the Antiquities of the Jews is considered probably the best evidence for Jesus, yet it has some serious problems :
* the T.F. as it stands uses clearly Christian phrases and names Christ as Messiah, it could not possibly have been written by the devout Jew Josephus (who remained a Jew and refused to call anyone "messiah" in his book which was partly about how false messiahs kept leading Israel astray.),
* The T.F. was not mentioned by any of the early Church fathers who reviewed Josephus.
* Origen even says Josephus does NOT call Jesus the Messiah, showing the passage was not present c.200CE.
* The T.F. first showed up in manuscripts of Eusebius, and was still absent from some manuscripts as late as 8th century.
* The other tiny passage in Josephus refers to Jesus, son of Damneus. The phrase "so-called Christ" may have been a later addition by a Christian who also mis-understood which Jesus was refered to.

An analysis of Josephus can be found here:
http://www.humanists.net/jesuspuzzle/supp10.htm

In short - this passage is possibly a total forgery (or at best a corrupt form of a lost original.)
But, yes,
it COULD just be actual evidence for Jesus - late, corrupt, controversial but just POSSIBLY real historical evidence.


TACITUS (c.112CE)

Roughly 80 years after the alleged events (and 40 years after the war) Tacitus allegedly wrote a (now) famous passage about "Christ" - this passage has several problems however:
* Tacitus uses the term "procurator", used in his later times, but not correct for the actual period, when "prefect" was used.
* Tacitus names the person as "Christ", when Roman records could not possibly have used this name (it would have been "Jesus, son of Joseph" or similar.)
* This passage is paraphrased by Sulpicius Severus in the 5th century without attributing it to Tacitus, and may have been inserted back into Tacitus from this work.

This evidence speaks AGAINST it being based on any Roman records -
but
merely a few details which Tacitus gathered from Christian stories circulating in his time (c.f. Pliny.)
So,
this passage is NOT evidence for Jesus,
it's just evidence for 2nd century Christian stories about Jesus.


SUETONIUS (c.115CE)

Roughly 80-90 years after the alleged Gospel events, (about 45 years after the war) Suetonius refers to a "Chrestus" who stirred the Jews to trouble in Rome during Claudius' time, but:
* this "Chrestus" is a Greek name (from "useful"), and is also a mystic name for an initiate, it is not the same as "Christos"
* this Chrestus was apparently active in Rome, Jesus never was.
So,
this passage is not evidence for Jesus,
it's nothing to do with Jesus,
it's evidence for Christians grasping at straws.
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/suetonius.html


THALLUS (date unknown)

We have NO certain evidence when Thallus lived or wrote, there are NONE of Thallus' works extant.
What we DO have is a 9th century reference by George Syncellus who quotes the 3rd century Julianus Africanus, who, speaking of the darkness at the crucifixion, wrote: "Thallus calls this darkness an eclipse".
But,
there is NO evidence Thallus made specific reference to Jesus or the Gospel events at all, as there WAS an eclipse in 29. This suggests he merely referred to a known eclipse, but that LATER Christians MIS-interpreted his comment to mean their darkness. (Also note the supposed reference to Thallus in Eusebius is a false reading.)

Richard Carrier the historian has a good page on Thallus:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/thallus.html

So,
Thallus is no evidence for Jesus at all,
merely evidence for Christian wishful thinking.


Julius Aficanus?
He is from CENTURIES later !


None of your evidence stands up to scrutiny.


Kapyong

How about Sinusitis? what did he have to say about this?
 
On a more serious note; i dont know what to say about Buddha but Horus...all we know is what people have recently made up.
 
Horus...all we know is what people have recently made up.
Heh? No, we have quite a bit of information from Egyptian records: inscriptions, papyrus scrolls, writings by foreign observers and occupiers.
And in none of them is Horus portrayed as the messianic son of a virgin or any other nonsense spread by the Zeitgeist "movie".
 
Xianity didn't just spring out of the ground.

Page 75
"The Secret Lore of Egypt: its impact on the West",
Erik Hornung, Translated by David Lorton,
Cornell University Press, 2001, ISBN 0801438470
An amulet was found depicting Christ on one side and Shed (in the form of Horus) on the reverse.


The newer built on the older, what's so hard to get?


What I want to know is how many Jewish beliefs are based in Christianity. Which while this seems odd, most certainly did happen.
Now THAT is interesting.
 
Heh? No, we have quite a bit of information from Egyptian records: inscriptions, papyrus scrolls, writings by foreign observers and occupiers.
And in none of them is Horus portrayed as the messianic son of a virgin or any other nonsense spread by the Zeitgeist "movie".

i agree that Zeitgeist is BS and merely entertainment that appeals to a specific segment of society. the thing that i have issues with is how much of what we do know, that is considered mainstream, is conjecture.
 
The buddha was just a guy so no, he isn't based on a god.

There are countless similarities because we aren't really that different from each other and primative societies all face pretty much the same issues.
 
The Horus(or more likely general Egyptian influences)/Jesus link is a greater possibility. Certainly the Jews were supposedly Eyptian slaves for a while and their kindom was right next to, or part of Egypt for hundreds of years so there is bound to be cross over influences.

It can be argued that they got their monotheism from Aten even.
 
Even so, Judaism had been monotheistic for a good long while by the time Christianity came about. The influence of Atenism on Christianity itself is minimal.
 
Even so, Judaism had been monotheistic for a good long while by the time Christianity came about. The influence of Atenism on Christianity itself is minimal.

Only if you consider monotheism a minimal aspect of xtianity. Certainly they have trouble with the concept.
 
Atenism's influence on Judaism is huge, yeah. But it's direct influence on Christianity is minimal; it mostly influences Christianity via Judaism.
In any case, Atenism being involved with Jewish monotheism doesn't indicate traditional Egyptian mythology influencing it. If anything, it means the complete opposite, since Atenism was entirely antithetical to Egyptian orthodoxy, intending to replace with with monist or monotheistic sun-worship.
 
Jesus, was associate with similar miracles to Horus (like walking on water).
Moise, was probably an important priest in Egypt and is believed to have been the son of the Pharaon. And a little before him, Nefertiti succeed installing the first monotheism religion, but was overpowers by the priest after a while and polytheism was installed once more. So Moise, flew with the Jews, on mount Sinai, to claim belief in one god! His name was derive from the god Dionysos (son of Zeus and also known as Zagreus outside Greece), who was also worship at mount Nyssa (today Sinai) so to call his "new god" Jehova-russi (or. Lao-nisi for again Dionisi.
For reference too, Osiris, Zagreus or Bacchus were born on mount Sinai which was called by the Egyptians Mount Nissa, the brazen serpent was a nis... And the month of Jewish passover is Nisan... Any similarities here you think?

To make things worst, the origin of Dionysos was from India and probably Sivaic or Buddhistical as Core and persophoneia was but the goddess Parasu-pani or Bhavani the patroness of the thugs called also Goree. Actually the whole story of Orpheus ring Indian in origin since the start, so it is also likely to derived from India...
 
Last edited:
There is a great deal of mythology surrounding Horus, some of it seems somewhat similar to the elements of the Jesus story. There are sites that pick on those particlulars and assert they are the same, but Horus is a lot more complex.

Did the Jesus myth writers borrow some of those elements? It seems likely but the similarities are not as exacting as some would suggest.

Is Jesus a myth? The inconsistencies and the direct contradictions in the gospel stories and the lateness of their writings, some decades after his aledged existence and the fact that there is no direct independent evidence from his time, suggest that he is mostly or entirely myth. Note that even today with our high tech audio/visual reporting capabilities we often get things wrong about events 50 years ago. The word of mouth reporting of some 2000 years ago, with a 50 years break, were likely to have been signficantly less reliable.
 
Atenism's influence on Judaism is huge, yeah. But it's direct influence on Christianity is minimal; it mostly influences Christianity via Judaism.

Fair enough.

In any case, Atenism being involved with Jewish monotheism doesn't indicate traditional Egyptian mythology influencing it.

Atenism's monotheistic aspect was antithetical, but all the rest of it had roots in the orthadoxy, even aten.

If Judaism managed to live in Egypt's shadow for what? Upwards of a thousand years? And didn't absorb anything, that would be amazing.
 
Back
Top