Why should you? For the sake of the discussion. S.A.M. accused you, in another thread, of refusing all arguments that are against your ideas. You, one way or another, called her a liar for this remark. So far in this thread, I haven't seen anything from you that suggests that you're not the one who's lying. Here's your chance to prove her, and me, wrong.
This is bad logic. Watch how I apply it substituting homosexuality. I like vanilla better than chocolate. I didn't choose to like vanilla better than chocolate, I just do. Hence, it must be genetic.
If homosexuality is not a choice, it needs to be genetic
This is bad logic. Watch how I apply it substituting homosexuality. I like vanilla better than chocolate. I didn't choose to like vanilla better than chocolate, I just do. Hence, it must be genetic.