We ask why because we want to imbue our lives with some externally derived meaning.
Are we separate from the world then?
Remember, the Universe is by definition a unity, hence scientific objectivity is ultimately an illusion.
We ask why because we want to imbue our lives with some externally derived meaning.
Are we separate from the world then?
Remember, the Universe is, by definition, a unity, hence scientific objectivity is ultimately an illusion.
What you say sounds good but , in my opinion, it is devoid of meaning.
Reality Where did that come from ? You are misquoting me. I said there is a negative correlation between intelligence and religiousity !!!!!
Because there is no objective evidence to support his existence, the chances of there being a god are highly unlikely. So, on balance, I reject the notion of god.
Those who believe in god accept evidence which does not hold up in a rational debate. That is why I believe they are wrong.
This topic has been flogged to death, covering personal experience, books said to be holy, prophets and so on, none of which can be defended rationally.
You are putting words in my mouth talking of fools and morons , when I have said no such thing. I assume you believe this bolsters your case somehow; it does not.
I believe people who claim there is a god are foolish for entertaining a belief which, to a rational mind, cannot be shown to be true. God is on a par with the tooth fairy. You are, of course, free to disagree but , if you do so, let's have reasons instead of the tired old arguments which are repeated ad nauseam !
If you believe in a creator-god you must surely believe he gave you the ability to reason. Use it !
So far Intelligent Design has required 15+ billion years to get to the point where somebody suspects it. Perhaps an intelligence kick started the universe but that would be it, let the chips fall where they may. Intelligence, highly unlikely.....design, out of the question.
However, what I am saying is, even with science, it does not in any way suggest anything for god: whether it be credibility or ridiculousness.
Also Intelligent design is not "crap"; it's very logical.
ID is about the dumbest thing in this world.
You claim to be agnostic now but you still seem to heavily lean towards theism. In fact, you sound like a theist that is trying to hide that fact.
Research it a bit, you will find out soon enough.How is ID dumb?
No chance you are still secretly theistic ?I'm agnostic but I used to be a theist, remember that; I used to Muslim and then became Christian and then became agnostic
Research it a bit, you will find out soon enough.
No chance you are still secretly theistic ?
No. If I had to choose between being a theist or an atheist, tho, I'd be a theist.
How is ID dumb?
That doesn't exactly counter my assessment lol
I simply confirmed that yes, I am more on the theistic side, but I consider myself agnostic. I do not pray or go to religious services
It explains NOTHING.
That doesn't exactly counter my assessment lol
Ah ok
A LOT of Christians don't go to churches or pray either, they just say they believe in God.. that's it.
You can be a theist without keeping to a religious protocol.
But I'm agnostic; I do not reject or confirm the idea of God
You said you would choose theism if you had to choose between atheism and theism.
How can you pick something you don't believe in ?
At least atheism doesn't make any positive claims.
Do you believe in God ? Yes or no ?