Yea, but it's not a god.
I believe that it is all part of what is called god. You don't like that word or the idea of such a thing.
Yea, but it's not a god.
So you are calling the laws of nature god? Ok, then..
I'm sorry? The laws of nature are just the laws of nature. What makes them 'higher powers' to you?
I believe that it is all part of what is called god. You don't like that word or the idea of such a thing.
A part of it that is called the father and creator and judge. I think that god is more than that though.
Because I am subject to them.
Why do you call it god when you know its the laws of nature. Remember the pear?
No, you said god is the laws of the universe.
Wrong, you are a manifestation of them.
Alright Lori.
:cheers:
We always seem to get into the exact same discussion, no matter what the topic is. Lets not anymore.
are you ditching me for good?
On this subject, yes. Neither of us is getting anywhere and, frankly, it's getting tiresome.
*************Maybe. ברא is the word you're talking about, it's the second word. It's most often translated as "Create". But the breaking up the word you can have it say "רא" "see" and "ב" in. So it could be "in sight" or "with sight". Though they have identical implications in Hebrew.
*************Not it doesn't.
It just kind of changes the meaning in English a little.
instead of...
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
it's...
"In the beginning God brought into site the heavens and the earth"
*************You are getting soft, MW
i call it god because from what i've observed it is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.
Apparently, the notion that God created heaven and Earth is based on a mistranslation.
The word 'bara' had always been taken to mean 'create', but now an expert on the Old Testament, Ellen van Wolde, says that it actually means 'spacial separation'.
ARTICLE: http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/10/god_separated_heaven_and_earth.php
Your thoughts? And what does this mean to, and for, religious people?