DefSkeptic
Registered Senior Member
MarcAC-
I see what you mean, some concepts need a lot more faith than others. The ones that take less faith provide more evidence, thus strengthening its validity.
God either exists or he doesn't. Fact or no fact. We are not sure, no matter how much one convinces themselves. We can examine what evidence has been put forth and go in the general trend of what we believe to be true from this evidence.
You didnt, I simply posed those questions to illicit a response.
Faulty in that I believe you are coming to a premature conclusion without knowing all the pertinent information needed to convince oneself of the "fact" of God.
Dont you think a proper understanding of the universe we inhabit is necessary for a conclusion to be made? If you dont know how the universe operates then you shouldnt be so eager to attach vague concepts to the mechanisms that created and maintain our universe.
Can you describe to me your God. Is it the Christian God or something else?
If it is indeed the Christian God, I think myself and many others can vouch that this is an intellectually infantile concept.
We accept everything upon some degree of faith
I see what you mean, some concepts need a lot more faith than others. The ones that take less faith provide more evidence, thus strengthening its validity.
In your uninformed opinion. You don't know if God's existence is fact or not based on your reasoning. Am I presumptious or what???
God either exists or he doesn't. Fact or no fact. We are not sure, no matter how much one convinces themselves. We can examine what evidence has been put forth and go in the general trend of what we believe to be true from this evidence.
This is obviously a preprogrammed response to anyone who believes in God. Please indicate where in my posts on this thread or forum I indicated that.
You didnt, I simply posed those questions to illicit a response.
You presume it's faulty... o.k... your presumption.
Faulty in that I believe you are coming to a premature conclusion without knowing all the pertinent information needed to convince oneself of the "fact" of God.
This is why I think you should at least consider my point of view-Why should I accept your opinion without proof?
I accpet that I'm ignorant about the universe as it is in physical state.
Dont you think a proper understanding of the universe we inhabit is necessary for a conclusion to be made? If you dont know how the universe operates then you shouldnt be so eager to attach vague concepts to the mechanisms that created and maintain our universe.
But God is not an infantile or whatever 'interpretation' in fact. That's just your opinion. I see no evidence to support it.
Can you describe to me your God. Is it the Christian God or something else?
But God is not an infantile or whatever 'interpretation' in fact.
If it is indeed the Christian God, I think myself and many others can vouch that this is an intellectually infantile concept.