Yes, that would be why I made the statements I did.have you done any study on the subject ?
look at the highest selling books and TV interviews etc...
For every debunker that's seen on TV (here at least) there's 4 or 5 "psychics".
For every debunker known by name to the general public (if they could name even one) there's 10 "psychics" known.
That would be atheists, no?Like churches ?
why not go after them or is that because they are too powerful and they cant beat them up like a poor person with no support ?
Or are you trying to change the subject?
As opposed to classic predators going for the gullible.they are classic bully personalty types with very little to no real empathy
What would those sort do with empathy?
I didn't mention "profit" I said "publicity".where is your proof of more profit ?
Change the subject?because that is my point.
trying to change the subject of the argument to infer something else is not going to work with me.
(BTW the word is "imply").
No you didn't: you simply said "media promotion".as i said refer TV interviews web sites and book sales.
TV here (again) gives FAR FAR more publicity to the frauds, I can't remember the last time a debunker was given an interview for their latest book (if ever).
Because that's who the so-called "psychics" prey on maybe?and !
look at who they chase after.
not the big organised churches of the pedophile farms in the american bible belt with generations of systematic rape and kidnapping of children but some little old lady seeking some solace about her dead husband etc...
Or are you STILL trying to change the subject?
Nope, they're people concerned about general gullibility in the public domain.they go for the soft targets because they are weak coward psychopathic bullys.