Crazy things famous Christians say


Interesting sentence from this link is:
"About 10% of rams (males) refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other rams."

Does this show that homosexuality amongst rams has no hereditary basis?
Rams that did not breed would have no progeny.
Or are there benefits to the flock from homosexual rams?

Maybe the occasional gay ram cheers up the flock in bad times
and so helps group survival.
For example, if there is not enough grass, there may be a part of the field more "fashionable" or with a better view.
 
Last edited:
Sorry , I meant scientific/statistical data.
Simple data point - in the US, .025% of people are convicted of rape. If we assume that 1 in 4 people who commit rape are convicted of it, then ~.1% of people are rapists. Not all (or even most) of them are crimes caused by lust, so the number of people who commit rape because they cannot control their sex drive is significantly lower than that.
 
Sorry , I meant scientific/statistical data.
Simple data point - in the US, .025% of people are convicted of rape. If we assume that 1 in 4 people who commit rape are convicted of it, then ~.1% of people are rapists. Not all (or even most) of them are crimes caused by lust, so the number of people who commit rape because they cannot control their sex drive is significantly lower than that.

Evidence?

jan.
 
and psychologist have determined that rape is a control issue, not a sex issue.
 
jan said:
I'll have the theological one please.
OK: whatever Deity made humans the way they are made them unable to choose their prompts of sexually arousal.

nmn said:
and psychologist have determined that rape is a control issue, not a sex issue
? Control is a sex issue, and vice versa.
 
PhysBang,



There was really no need to open up a new can of worms, I just wanted to know how you defined homosexulal (HS) activity, as opposed to HS behaviour, as opposed to HS orientation

jan.

Really? You think that this opened a can of worms? It's just the facts that there is far, far more natural sexual activity than heterosexual human reproduction. Far more. You (and others) invoked "natural". That's why many of the things Christians say are crazy.
 
Really? You think that this opened a can of worms? It's just the facts that there is far, far more natural sexual activity than heterosexual human reproduction. Far more. You (and others) invoked "natural". That's why many of the things Christians say are crazy.

Like I said I just wanted to know how you define homosexulal (HS) activity, as opposed to HS behaviour, as opposed to HS orientation. Do I really need to specify human beings?

jan.
 
jan:
you may have said so before, but my memory is wack..

where do you stand on homosexuality?
 
Back
Top