The father of all.The Father of what or whom?
The father of all.The Father of what or whom?
Don't go away angry. That's not my intention. Maybe consider the possibility that you are and always have belonged...to something much larger than your ego.Anyway I am fed up with the stupidity of your evasion. I admit you do a good job of a Jan sock puppet
And from responsibility for their own lives, which is unfortunate. People "surrendering to God" is one of the reasons we have such a victim society these days,I think it is more about surrendering to God. Doing so releases a person from the past and the future.
How do you mean? What is a "victim society"?And from responsibility for their own lives, which is unfortunate. People "surrendering to God" is one of the reasons we have such a victim society these days,
Explain please. Something like "the father of the BB"?The father of all.
Then the question becomes, "who was the Father of the Father"? And we end up with an infinity of fathers begetting fathers.....Explain please. Something like "the father of the BB"?
A society that tends to blame external events out of their control (i.e. God, luck) rather than blame their own poor decisions for their plight.How do you mean? What is a "victim society"?
Each individual is his/her own story. So, you're saying people choose their own misfortune?A society that tends to blame external events out of their control (i.e. God, luck) rather than blame their own poor decisions for their plight.
Do all things have a common source?Explain please. Something like "the father of the BB"?
If we are to assume there is more than one Father.Then the question becomes, "who was the Father of the Father"? And we end up with an infinity of fathers begetting fathers.....
At some point expect to invoke some special pleadingThen the question becomes, "who was the Father of the Father"? And we end up with an infinity of fathers begetting fathers.....
There may only be one father... I only have one father...If we are to assume there is more than one Father.
Then the question becomes, "who was the Father of the Father"? And we end up with an infinity of fathers begetting fathers.....
At some point expect to invoke some special pleading
What did they all have in common, that we all have in common?There may only be one father... I only have one father...
But I do/did have two grandfathers.
And four great grandfathers.
Yes, that does pose a conundrum, but I would rather consider a hierarchical dynamical ordering resulting in fields of virtual particles, which combined can form into matter, than the formation of a sentient and motivated intelligence, which then just creates matter from nothing (Let there be light).:raises hand reluctantly:
Actually, that's the exact same problem we face today with the Big Bang Theory. If the BB creating everything we see, then what created the BB? And what created whatever created the BB?
So, it's not a conundrum specious to God, but to all of existence itself.
Not necessarily, it may be a hierarchy of orders. But indeed all things do have one common denominator, Potential. But potential needs not be intelligent. It just needs to be dynamical to become creative. It converts a state of possibility to a state of probability. As Bohm so nicely put it in "Wholeness and the Implicate Order."Do all things have a common source?
Wholeness and the Implicate Order ‘One of the most important books of our times.’ Resurgence ‘
I find his concept of wholeness extraordinarily appealing, as an explanation of the riddles of modern physics, and as a prescription for human living.’ John P. Wiley Jr, Smithsonian
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/DavidBohm-WholenessAndTheImplicateOrder.pdf‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order conveys a sense of work in progress, which aims at a distantly glimpsed ideal of the unification of all aspects of the world. . . . The feeling of struggle in Bohm’s book is its most appealing feature.’ Abner Shimony, Nature
Causal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulationThis means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves.
I see it as a dynamical collapse causing a compressed energy singularity, resulting in a mega-quantum event. Banggggggggggggggggggggggg! Creating the fields from which matter emerges.Yes, that does pose a cunundrum, but I would rather consider a hierarchical dynamical mathematical orderings resulting in fields of virtual particles, which combined can form into matter than the formation of a sentient and motivated intelligence, which then just creates matter from nothing.
It's that intelligent and motivated part that bothers me. It's an extra step that is really not neccessary in the self-assembly of a mathematical construct and philosophically just complicates matters.
Actually you may have millions of grandfathers, from single celled mindless micro-organisms to every species on the branch that led to homo sapiens.There may only be one father... I only have one father...
But I do/did have two grandfathers.
And four great grandfathers.
In a great many cases, yes. Someone who decides to drop out of school, then later suffers a life of poverty and unemployment, has created his own misfortune. Someone who smokes two packs a day, and is later diagnosed with lung cancer, has created his own misfortune. Someone who lives with his Mom, stays on the couch all day and watches TV, then complains that he can't meet women, has created his own misfortune.Each individual is his/her own story. So, you're saying people choose their own misfortune?
As Carlin said: If God has a Divine plan why do people expect him to change is plan because they have a two dollar prayer book.But if that's in God's plan for me I guess it will happen somehow. If not, who am I to question God?"