It makes control and ruling so much the easier for those...
for those who come up with these conspiracy theories.
It makes control and ruling so much the easier for those...
Sorry, your personal experience on a computer game is way less valid an argument than the link I gave to a flight expert. It doesn't fly. I don't know the company, or origins, nor the realism of your game. I don't know which plane you were simulating, nor do I know at what speed your approach vector was at. Nor do I know if this game simulated wind sheer. And frankly, I don't care; your talking out your ass, and your quite possibly full of shit. "because it is my experience" and "because I said so, and I'm knowledgeable and an expert" is the most piss poor argument on the planet. I am the only one that has supported any of the points I have made in this entire thread, with knowledgeable experts outside of my own point of view. I could care less if you reject them, it's evidence, there you go. It's better than what your side of the argument has, which is bupkiss. Frankly, in a disagreement, that amounts to a whole lot more in my book than just calling each other names, which is what your side of this discussion has had to resort to. . . telling me I am unintelligent, I know nothing, I don't know my facts, etc. What a lousy way to discuss an issueNot a dumbed-down game. A flight simulator, which mimics the controls and behaviour of real aircraft. I was right. You've never played one, have you?
I quite agree with this. My point with this is that the masses DON'T look for anything else, they are inherently lazy and believe what is spoon fed to them. Just like they believe what is on their T.V. Just as the news journalist and the news gathering organizations believe and accept everything the government tells them. . . it's a racket. It was less so before the deregulation of the media. Now, big business is cozy and in bed with the government, and the people only get to know what the government wants them to know. A critical look at what is going on? Rarely. Hard news coverage? Seldom. Accurate reporting? Never. They are now reporting that there is a recovery! Who believes this BS? Do you? The folks in the supermarket probably don't know, they could only tell you who is pregnant, who is with who, what's happening in the soaps, and the latest fad diet.You're not looking hard enough. There's plenty of good media out there.
A very brief search of the internet ought to disabuse you of silly notions like the Taliban having no allies, no funding, no sources of arms etc. Don't be dumb.
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09366t.pdfWe found that the U.S. Army and CSTC-A did not maintain complete
records for an estimated 87,000—or about 36 percent—of the 242,000
weapons Defense procured and shipped to Afghanistan for ANSF.
Specifically:
For about 46,000 weapons, the Army could not provide us serial numbers
to uniquely identify each weapon provided, which made it impossible for
us to determine their location or disposition.
• For about 41,000 weapons with serial numbers recorded, CSTC-A did not
have any records of their location or disposition.
5
Furthermore, CSTC-A did not maintain reliable records, including serial
numbers, for any of the 135,000 weapons it reported obtaining from
international donors from June 2002 through June 2008.
Alex Jones? Really?
That's like you asking for a political neutral source...and I post a clip of Rush Limbaugh. AJ is a charlatan that banks off his flock that believes anything he says. Geez..and your the one who brought up the media brainwashing people.
sigh. . . I'm not concerned about the source, it's the FACTS I'm concerned about. Do you think he is lying about the reputable people's opinions on this matter?
You should be concerned with the source, since they are the ones providing the "facts". If we were having a political debate, and I presented a statement by Rush Limbaugh as factual evidence...wouldn't you have a hard time believing it..since he's so partisan? AJ recently posted the transcript of interview done by celebrity Charlie Sheen with Pres. Obama, questioning him about 9/11. His flock was nearly cumming themselves to see such a high profile star getting to interview a sitting President about 9/11. That's because for the first few hours it was posted, there was no disclaimer on the post, letting everyone know this was just something that CS had written himself, and was actually fiction. They later added the disclaimer, but boooy! you should have seen how pissed many of the members were.
AJ is a publicity hound who says anything to get ratings for his radio show, and for selling t-shirts and dvds. He's in it for the green, not the truth.
I didn't know the NWO had a role call.
So what meds do you take?
Your disrespect and willful lack of education and knowledge are exceeded only by your immaturity. I accept your warped and twisted acknowledgment of defeat.
We shall consider your education at an end.
Peace and Light to you Mr. MacGyver.
your word and your reputation, your accuracy, and your facts are what you live and die by. . . any journalist worth his salt knows that. Just ask Dan Rather good sir. Nope, I trust them both.
...don't you see the irony in that? Your all over the place. You don't know what you believe.
:crazy:Your disrespect and willful lack of education and knowledge are exceeded only by your immaturity. I accept your warped and twisted acknowledgment of defeat.
Silly you it was your idiotic posts that told us this. You have no idea how images are projected, or what holograms are. You make stuff up as you go along. Your posting of PCTs continues to tell people quite a bit of your thinking.telling me I am unintelligent, I know nothing, I don't know my facts, etc. What a lousy way to discuss an issue
That is nonsensical. Expansion and continued dominance is simpler without an enemy.In order to stay where those forces are. .. . they need an enemy to fight, and that enemy needs weapons, food, etc. yes?
Not trying, it's over. Until you post some, oh, I don't know, evidence, sources, something substantial? You guys are just wind bags.
I post sources for my posts. My stuff is backed up, yours isn't. Sorry to break it to you. It is far easier to light a darkened room with a single candle, than it is to try to shut out all the light from a brightly lit room.
yeah, the truth works like that. It's why I can present sources for my arguments, and you can't. You have lies, I have truth. :deal:
not really, I listen to Rush all the time. He is quite intelligent and a level headed man. His only failure is to adequately see both sides of the issue, and to fully understand that conservative or liberal, party politics have long ago been sold out to the globalists.
He's playing checkers in a world game of chess. He is but a pawn. What do you think THESE people think of Rush .. . . or Obama for that matter? They are mere pawns. Comparatively, when all is said and done, they have not much power in the end. The real policies and plans are made when these folks gather. Rush is but a fool, a jester, a child, who really knows nothing about how the world works, and entertains and spins entertaining side shows about matters that, in the end, will be irrelevant in a few years time.
These are the king makers.