big red bulls eye on the wtc in 9/11

stereologist said:
I know. I know. My hand is up.

It was really a dark matter photon torpedo shot from the planet Porno by the evil Emperor Wanker.

No. It was a bunch of tiny self imploding nuclear weapons.

No. I got it now. It was weapons called high frequency energy dispersion blazers.

No. This is for real now. It was plasma rifles in the 40W range carried by a team of terminators.
Click to expand...

LOL...while the sad thing about your post...there are some troofers who REALLY believe energy beams from space, and mini nukes were really used.

I personally blame the Kebler elves in a an attempt to corner the chocolate chip cookie market. :)
 
Now stop trolling and respond to some of the challenges:
1. The time it took to collapse.
2. Missing explosion sounds

PS Bush is no longer president (or maybe he still is and Obama is a figurehead. Think about it - the uninvited guests were on Bush's guest list, not Obama's! It's a slam dunk proof that Bush is still president!)
 
MacGyver the sad thing is I couldn't come up with anything original to post. The twoofers beat me to all of the good silly explanations.
 
It is not scientific to argue points for or against the WTC7 collapse. Both arguing for, and arguing against are acts of faith, and religion. None of you know the truth. The loudest mouths, are the least scientific in either case.
 
Pincho Paxton said:
It is not scientific to argue points for or against the WTC7 collapse. Both arguing for, and arguing against are acts of faith, and religion. None of you know the truth. The loudest mouths, are the least scientific in either case.
Click to expand...

Thank you for that bit of Woo...and it contributes to this discussion how?

Scientifically, explosives make loud sounds...if explosives were used in any of the towers...their sound would have been recorded. We just don't see or hear this.

It doesn't take a lot of science or common sense to see the ludicracy of 911 trooof.
 
MacGyver1968 said:
Thank you for that bit of Woo...and it contributes to this discussion how?

Scientifically, explosives make loud sounds...if explosives were used in any of the towers...their sound would have been recorded. We just don't see or hear this.

It doesn't take a lot of science or common sense to see the ludicracy of 911 trooof.
Click to expand...

I have seen about 10 videos with the loud bangs on them just before WTC 7 top section started to collapse, causing a man to jump out of his skin. The TV footage is dubbed silent, that is suspicious too.


Or the guy in the building that says he heard an explosion, and was blow across the room.

Why do want to say that your proof is not to bother looking?
 
Last edited:
Pincho Paxton said:
I have seen about 10 videos with the loud bangs on them just before WTC 7 top section started to collapse, causing a man to jump out of his skin. The TV footage is dubbed silent, that is suspicious too.

Why do want to say that your proof is not to bother looking?

Or the guy in the building that says he heard an explosion, and was blow across the room, .
Click to expand...

For one thing...there's no reason to CD building 7. Did you watch the video I posted of a real implosion? Listen to how loud the sounds of the charges are. We simply don't hear anything before the collapse of that magnitude.

please post links to the videos with loud bangs.
 
Last edited:
It is not scientific to argue points for or against the WTC7 collapse. Both arguing for, and arguing against are acts of faith, and religion. None of you know the truth. The loudest mouths, are the least scientific in either case.
Click to expand...

Wow. That's simply not true.

The saying is, "Those who know the least know it the loudest." On this forum you won't see the all caps by those know what's going on. We can direct you to evidence. MacGyver has already done that.
 
I have seen about 10 videos with the loud bangs on them just before WTC 7 top section started to collapse, causing a man to jump out of his skin. The TV footage is dubbed silent, that is suspicious too.
Click to expand...

Show us.
 
There were lots of explosions and loud sounds on 9/11. The impacting jet liners. The explosions caused by jet fuel going down the elevator shafts. There are many things that explode in fires: electrical transformers, fuel laden smoke when oxygen is introduced, even partial building collapses, falling debris. But CDs have many explosions with sharp reports that go off one right after the other.
 
stereologist said:
There were lots of explosions and loud sounds on 9/11. The impacting jet liners. The explosions caused by jet fuel going down the elevator shafts. There are many things that explode in fires: electrical transformers, fuel laden smoke when oxygen is introduced, even partial building collapses, falling debris. But CDs have many explosions with sharp reports that go off one right after the other.
Click to expand...

I doubt that you need them however. A good way to cover up a conspiracy is to agree with the accusers, but in a way that can be proved false. This then destroys the credibility of real evidence.
 
Pincho Paxton said:
I doubt that you need them however. A good way to cover up a conspiracy is to agree with the conspirators, but in a way that can be proved false. This then destroys the credibility of real evidence.
Click to expand...

I would nominate the bolded section as the "Woo of the month statement". You don't see the forest for the trees...do ya Pincho?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top