Historically, Huxley intended agnosticism to be a "process" rather than a creed, do you concur?
Lerxst said:Huh?
I find that agnosticism is liberating.
what i mean is that when it comes to discussing religion, atheists have a tendency to attack people for some reason
i don't know what it is about this subject that makes atheists so heated up... believers too
there difference there is just that insulting god to them must be like insulting a dear father or something
i guess atheists are just happy that there's no hell so that they're free to treat everyone like shit
So you say. But everyone here knows that you were insulting atheists. You have an agenda, and don't bother trying to deny it.i apologise for the misunderstanding
my posts were not meant to be understood as attack, they were just observations
Please don't play dumb. You know that you were rude and condescending.i'm sorry... did i sound rude or unfriendly to you?
Ahh, I see. But earlier on, you touted your opinion as fact. You said:"atheists are angry" is not an affirmation to be statisticaly proved... i made it clear that this is my own opinion, i talking about people that i've met and spoken to...
Too late. Apologizing with the mere intent of projecting the appearance of an angelic attitude is tired and lame. You MEANT to offend with your comments. Your comments WERE bigoted, and false generalizations. Now that you've been caught with your pants down, you're backpeddling. Next time, think twice before talking such nonsense.i'm sorry if you feel offended
Ahh, see! Right after giving a half-hearted apology, you attempt to demonize atheists. Apologize, and then attack immediately after. Have a guess at how much credibility your apology has now... NONE.if it matters at all, you are not really doing much to better the image of atheists imo
Mythbuster said:Let's reword it then, God exists, for the weak minded, the delusional, the misguided, the confused, the deceived, the disinformed, the foolish, the ill-advised, the imprudent, the misled, the misplaced, the mistaken, the unreasonable, the unwise, the disfunctional religious prat.
Varda said:then i guess 95% of the atheists i've spoken to are exceptions... 95% exception? where are all the nice atheists hiding, huh?
Thanks! Personally, I don't think that I'm very verbose, or an 'intellectual'. But I do try my best.Wow, nice post mountainhare, rather forceful yet mildly forgiving... hope it sinks in.
Heh, how true! Another common trait fundamentalists display is the 'persecution' complex. Somehow, society is always persecuting them. If the secular laws don't agree with their religious laws, then we're persecuting them. If an atheist dare points out the irrational mindset behind a fundamentalist interpretation of scripture, the fundie screams 'persecution'. God forbid actually trying to rebut the claim... just scream 'persecution and oppression'. Demonize your opponent instead of substantiating your own claims. A number of fundies here do that, especially Jan Ardena.I've noticed a tendency when arguing with so-called "fundies" (but this also applies to others) of "accidental offense"- I'm sure you're aware of it, but I caution those who haven't experienced it-- that is the phenomenon of "insulting you while being polite."
qwerty mob said:Historically, Huxley intended agnosticism to be a "process" rather than a creed, do you concur?