Look, I don't go from being an atheist to being an "agnostic" just because you can play argumentum ad ignoratum. If you don't have any real evidence for a proposition, its ranking is somewhere between zero and any real number divided by infinity.
that's cause you don't know him.
or so you say...:bugeye:
Not knowing him suggests he exists. So far I haven't even found so much as a vague hint that might suggest he existed.
I have absolutely no reason whatsoever even to begin to think that he might exist.
If anyone think he/she can convince me of his existence, be my guest.
I'll rephrase.KNOWING him suggests he exists. I can tell you about someone you've never known of all day long and you can say "you're making that shit up. That's not who you really know, you imagined it. Or its really somebody else."
That's nonsense. According to that no one can ever know someone else.The only way you really get to know somebody and verify who they are is to really know them.
*************well what you do with the evidence is up to you.
1- worthy or not is not the point..if you mean worthy as in deserves it because he's good..then it makes no difference.
2-if worthy as in is he great enough than he has to, other wise he wouldn't be god..that's what the term "god" is all about..one who is great enough to deserve worshiping.
not if he sent a book ..which he did, which you ignored, then sat around in circles brainstorming the point out of life.
no because they all don't exist..only one god (MY god, also yours and everyone else's), exists.
not believing in something because you don't like it, because it doesn't suit you, is childish(?)
but, if you had the patience to sit through an extremely long lecture that includes a lengthy segment on Quran miracles, I could give you ample reason to believe that you are very stupid to believe that you don't have a "god."
BIG WRONG.. i was joking, it was like saying (could go fu** themselves), will i then be wishing eternal suffering to others?
there's a BIIG gap between believe, and wish.
Okay, so what you are saying is that, if I choose to accept the Lord Jesus Christ into my heart and ask Him for Salvation and a place in the Kingdom of Heaven, then I would know that he exists? Lori, are you sure that you are not just lying? You see, I used to be a Southern Baptist, and I come from a very large family of Southern Baptists. I can tell you from decades-worth of experience with people just like you that you really are making shit up. You're all the same. The sense of dissociation associated with your "spiritual experiences" gave me the heebie-jeebies, but that's really all it was: it was a drug high. You are a bunch of miserable addicts, and you ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Fortunately, autists seem to have a bit of resistance to drug addiction.KNOWING him suggests he exists. I can tell you about someone you've never known of all day long and you can say "you're making that shit up. That's not who you really know, you imagined it. Or its really somebody else."
The only way you really get to know somebody and verify who they are is to really know them.
they should all be agnostic, because they can't prove god's nonexistence.
A god tho is in a different category all to itself
Even if we accept the definitions implied then you're still wrong.
I cannot *prove* that leprechauns don't exist, I'm still justified in being an a-leprechaunist. To put it simply, it's ridiculous. I could be wrong - granted. Perhaps there are leprechauns running all over the place. I am fully justified to consider it utter baloney until such time where the claimant to positive existence can actually provide some genuine support.
I know, I know, you're going to say to me that "god and leprechauns aren't the same", but they are to the atheist - which is the very point.
Jan,
Way more people have acted evil in the name of various religions than ever acted evil in the name of atheism.
In fact, I would argue that the examples you gave only occurred in the presence of a communist political philosphy which justified violent political revolution.
You have yet to show how atheism rationalizes violence the way certain religious texts do.
While theism is only a belief in God, religions do not stop there. Atheism has no parallel to religion.
Yes, quite so. If there is a personal God, it's reasonable to assume He was involved in dictating to people how they should live, and so theism is the first step down the road to fundamentalism.
It's history. The evils of Stalin or Hoxha were not more significant to your argument if they killed 50 million people than if they killed 50 people.
Yet religions have caused more people to act evil as individuals, to hate others of different religions, to oppress women and burn witches or stone adulterers.
KNOWING him suggests he exists.
nope.
when the majority of the world believe in leprechauns(whatever they are), then you can't be so sure. THAT is why you you can't really call yourself an atheist. (and relate to logic anyway)
the majority of the world believe in leprechauns
All the violence commited in my area, are caused by people who do not consider religion important.
The rules of God are clearly laid out (in the case of the bible, the 10 commandments)
Where in these commandments does it encourage oppression of women, or murder of those who think differently?