Well then, let's see you do just that.
OK, supply your notion of God in as complete of a form as you have it, along with any thinking that led to it, and I will have a go at it.
Well then, let's see you do just that.
i'm not lost. i'm found.
i think you're equating "christians" with "a lot of religious people", and a lot of religious people wouldn't know christ if he slapped them across the face, which hopefully one day he will.
You don't need religion my friend. Religion only uses your good faith to spread its word. Religion is ill logical. If God made all man, and he intended to be worshiped by man he would have created his own religion. Religion only causes wars. Religion doesn't get you closer to God, love, however, does.
Spiritual experience is why i believe
Nuh uh, no cheating.SciWriter said:OK, supply your notion of God in as complete of a form as you have it, along with any thinking that led to it, and I will have a go at it.
Nuh uh, no cheating.
You supply your own notion, then show that it's self-contradictory, as you claimed.
Shall I assume that all you can do is assume that, along with all your other assumptions?SciWriter said:Shall I assume that your God existed forever and is the One who planned and created everything else, such as the universe?
So, a voice in your head, which was not your own, of course, made itself known as God or you decided it as such (which?), and it told you ultimate truths and facts?
Shall I assume that all you can do is assume that, along with all your other assumptions?
among other things.
it answered the call, and it's characteristics and capabilities rule out anything else.
That's just ridiculous. You're claiming now that if God existed everyone would believe it?SciWriter said:It is already a given that God believers have no evidence for Him in His various incarnations, for if they did, there would be no unbelievers.
We won't bother to get into your denial and declarations of God's nonexistence, which are really easy to see through.We won’t bother to get into the neglect and denial that they must have in order to always and ever proceed in their pronouncements and declarations of God’s existence, for at least that is easily seen through.
That's just ridiculous. You're claiming now that if God existed everyone would believe it?
So since not everyone believes it, God must not exist?
That form of argument is logically invalid, because you're denying the consequent of it.
You aren't much of a logician, are you?
We won't bother to get into your denial and declarations of God's nonexistence, which are really easy to see through.
You claimed that the notion of God is self-contradictory, but all you've managed to come up with is a completely invalid argument. You have not demonstrated any self-contradiction except for a statement that contradicts logic.
Want to try again, or have you run out of ideas?
So now you're saying that if someone could prove God exists, unbelievers (if they were honest) would realise they were wrong?SciWriter said:I'm saying that no believer can prove God, since if they did then unbelievers would have to concede (if they were to be honest).
people will do what they do irregardless of any proof.So now you're saying that if someone could prove God exists, unbelievers (if they were honest) would realise they were wrong?
So, you actually heard its outright statements of truths and it wasn't just a mere sensation or feeling molded by you into something more, that is, you heard from Him during the call about what He is and what He did and does? Or you just ruled out anything else and thereby concluded that it was God?
OK, so it is that human mammals invented various notions of God and there is some amount of commonality to these descriptions. God is an entity who was First and Only before all else that it may have created in all its foundation and further details, for whatever reason, such as for sure a very large universe in which said mammals came to be alive on Earth. This entity of God is thus usually described as the ultimate thinking Being who is all powerful, all knowing, and may even be invisibly everywhere doing everything.
We won’t worry about all the details of His operations since they won’t matter if He is shown not to exist via self-contradiction. We should hope to not only disprove the most common God, the God of the Bible, but also the most difficult One, which is perhaps that of a Deity who foresaw everything and is no longer even nearby or at least not affecting anything. (Even sounds like the greatest scientist of all.)
It is already a given that God believers have no evidence for Him in His various incarnations, for if they did, there would be no unbelievers. While that is a total failure, a reason for diminishing and even disproving the notions of God is that believers unethically proclaim God as truth and fact, which leads to many problems. They will only continue to be dishonest if left alone. We won’t bother to get into the neglect and denial that they must have in order to always and ever proceed in their pronouncements and declarations of God’s existence, for at least that is easily seen through.
Anyone else have any God definitions or any amendments to what we have so far? Or any reasons why there must be God to explain us and the universe? For example, a person on another forum said that there had to be a Higher Intelligence behind our lower intelligence. Don’t worry, though, for we won’t be dismissing God on the basis of these faulty reasonings; it’s just to round out the picture of why people want or wish for a Creator.
So, a voice in your head, which was not your own, of course, made itself known as God or you decided it as such (which?), and it told you ultimate truths and facts?
It's not cheating, for there are differing notions. What is yours?
Shall I assume that your God existed forever and is the One who planned and created everything else, such as the universe?
Does He provide ongoing maintenance or did He just leave everything on its own?
Does He provide an afterlife?
Is there a soul?
Reincarnation?
Hell?
Angels and other types of higher beings?
Etc.