I'm the one who figured out the offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether.
If you find a better explanation then post it.
Aether Displacement
- Thread starter mpc755
- Start date
I'm the one who figured out the offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether.
If you find a better explanation then post it.
@mpc --
Again, I don't need an alternative explanation to reject yours until you support yours with evidence. If you're as smart as you say you are, and you'd have to be smart on an unprecedented scale to figure this out with literally no experimenting or doing any math, then you should have no problem getting the funding to verify your hypothesis(and I use that term incredibly loosely).
When it comes to science, you either put up the evidence or you shut up. Do one or the other.
Again, I don't need an alternative explanation to reject yours until you support yours with evidence. If you're as smart as you say you are, and you'd have to be smart on an unprecedented scale to figure this out with literally no experimenting or doing any math, then you should have no problem getting the funding to verify your hypothesis(and I use that term incredibly loosely).
When it comes to science, you either put up the evidence or you shut up. Do one or the other.
The evidence aether is physically displaced by matter is the offset.
How about this one:
Although I'm sure you can easily refute the maths and datasets that they gathered in support of this contention, right?
That might be correct. I still think the galaxy clusters are moving with respect to the state of the aether is more correct.
The offset is evidence aether is physically displaced by matter.
Last edited:
What a surprise.
It's also possible that "Such offsets can be of either astrophysical origin or caused by random or systematic noise."
-emphasis mine
Any chance of that?
It could be. I still think the most correct explanation is due to the galaxy clusters moving with respect to the state of the aether.
Proof by verbosity fallacy. The truth value of an idea is unaffected by how often and how loud you say it.
Of course you do, however you've not given us any reason to accept your analysis. First you must demonstrate that the aether exists, and circular reasoning can't do that.
The offset is evidence aether exists.
The observed behaviors in a double slit experiment are evidence aether exists.
The Milky Way's halo being in the shape of a squished beach ball is evidence aether exists.
Gravity is evidence aether exists.
The ripple created when galaxy clusters collide is evidence aether exists.
The Casimir effect is evidence aether exists.
Zero-point energy is evidence aether exists. Zero-point energy is the energy associated with the aether displaced by the matter. This is what de Broglie referred to as, "any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium".
Last edited:
'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1106/1106.3955v2.pdf
"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity."
"In our opinion, the fact that gravitational aether has the same number of free parameters as GR, and is yet (to our knowledge) consistent with all cosmological and precision tests of gravity at 2σ level, indicates that this theory could be a strong contender for Einstein’s theory of gravity."
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1106/1106.3955v2.pdf
"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity."
"In our opinion, the fact that gravitational aether has the same number of free parameters as GR, and is yet (to our knowledge) consistent with all cosmological and precision tests of gravity at 2σ level, indicates that this theory could be a strong contender for Einstein’s theory of gravity."
Yes that sounds good to me. Funny how things happen really. In 2004, nobody would talk about bubbles in space. I was getting banned from sites for using the term. Now it is used a couple of times a month in science. It seems that the Aether is also starting to become a more common term again.
In the article it says vorticity is slightly more accurate in terms of the experimental evidence than pressure is, which is your flow. What can be described as a flow of the aether can also be described as the direction of the force associated with the state of displacement of the aether.
In the Casimir effect it is the pressure exerted toward the plates by the displaced incompressible fluid aether which encompasses the plates, along with the cancellation of the force associated with the aether which exists between both plates which both plates together displace toward its rest position, which forces the plates together.
Zero-point energy is the energy associated with the incompressible fluid aether displaced from its rest position by a particle of matter.
In a double slit experiment, the moving particle displaces the incompressible fluid aether. It is a displacement wave in the incompressible fluid aether which enters and exits both slits. The particle enters and exits a single slit.
Last edited:
More Evidence for a Preferred Direction in Spacetime
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27138/
"Today, they confirm that the preferred axis is real. According to their calculations, the direction of greatest acceleration is in the constellation of Vulpecula in the Northern hemisphere. That's consistent with other analyses and also with other evidence such as other data showing a preferred axis in the cosmic microwave background. That will force cosmologists to an uncomfortable conclusion: the cosmological principle must be wrong. But it also raises exciting questions: why does the Universe have a preferred axis and how do should we account for it in our models of the cosmos?"
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27138/
"Today, they confirm that the preferred axis is real. According to their calculations, the direction of greatest acceleration is in the constellation of Vulpecula in the Northern hemisphere. That's consistent with other analyses and also with other evidence such as other data showing a preferred axis in the cosmic microwave background. That will force cosmologists to an uncomfortable conclusion: the cosmological principle must be wrong. But it also raises exciting questions: why does the Universe have a preferred axis and how do should we account for it in our models of the cosmos?"
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.
Doesn't that prove flow rather than displacement? Because that was something I posted about years ago to explain how a universal membrane should break under pressure, and then we would flow towards a new universe.
Aether emitted into the Universal jet likely flows. However, it may not. What we do know is aether emitted into the Universal jet will displace the aether and matter which already exists in the Universal jet causing the directionality detected in the experiments.
The following is correct.
Pressure exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.
Curved spacetime is displaced aether.
The ripple created when galaxy clusters collide is an aether displacement wave.
The offset between light lensing through the space neighboring moving galaxy clusters and the galaxy clusters themselves is caused by the galaxy clusters moving through and displacing the aether.
The Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole. Aether is continually emitted into the Universal jet.
It is not the Big Bang, it is the Big Ongoing.
Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether and matter have mass. Matter is condensations of aether. The physical effects matter evaporating into aether has on the neighboring aether and matter is energy.
The aether of relativity at every place determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.
If you want to add flow to the aether then it is your choice. The above is more than enough to straighten out the absurd state of physics today.
Pretty big claims considering they are completely unfounded and unevidenced.
Plus the fact that (for starters):
1 You are a troll
2 You are a liar
3 You do not understand simple high school physics
4 You dishonestly attribute your goofy ideas to real scientists
Plus the fact that (for starters):
1 You are a troll
2 You are a liar
3 You do not understand simple high school physics
4 You dishonestly attribute your goofy ideas to real scientists
The following is evidence pressure exerted by aether toward matter is gravity.
'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...106.3955v2.pdf
"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity. In our opinion, the fact that gravitational aether has the same number of free parameters as GR, and is yet (to our knowledge) consistent with all cosmological and precision tests of gravity at 2σ level, indicates that this theory could be a strong contender for Einstein’s theory of gravity."
The following is evidence the Universe is, or the local Universe we exist in is in, a jet; analogous to the polar jet of a black hole.
More Evidence for a Preferred Direction in Spacetime
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27138/
"Today, they confirm that the preferred axis is real. According to their calculations, the direction of greatest acceleration is in the constellation of Vulpecula in the Northern hemisphere. That's consistent with other analyses and also with other evidence such as other data showing a preferred axis in the cosmic microwave background. That will force cosmologists to an uncomfortable conclusion: the cosmological principle must be wrong. But it also raises exciting questions: why does the Universe have a preferred axis and how do should we account for it in our models of the cosmos?"