Aether Displacement
- Thread starter mpc755
- Start date
The following is evidence galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.
'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16739.x/abstract
"We compile a sample of 38 galaxy clusters which have both X-ray and strong lensing observations, and study for each cluster the projected offset between the dominant component of baryonic matter centre (measured by X-rays) and the gravitational centre (measured by strong lensing). Among the total sample, 45 per cent clusters have offsets [greater than]10 arcsec. The [greater than]10 arcsec separations are significant, considering the arcsecond precision in the measurement of the lensing/X-ray centres. This suggests that it might be a common phenomenon in unrelaxed galaxy clusters that gravitational field is separated spatially from the dominant component of baryonic matter. It also has consequences for lensing models of unrelaxed clusters since the gas mass distribution may differ from the dark matter distribution and give perturbations to the modelling. Such offsets can be used as a statistical tool for comparison with the results of Lambda cold dark matter ( CDM) simulations and to test the modified dynamics."
The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.
No this is not evidence of your goofy ideas.
That is only your goofy spin on an observation. There is no evidence in there, just silly supposition and half assed analogies
What I find particularly strange is that mpc seems to be incapable of posting anything other than his original claims. Time and time and time again.
He can't even take a different approach to "explanation".
I wonder if he suffers from some sort of autism (besides, of course, the obvious stupidity that he's a victim to).
Or maybe it's some feeble attempt at AI that's stuck in a loop.
He can't even take a different approach to "explanation".
I wonder if he suffers from some sort of autism (besides, of course, the obvious stupidity that he's a victim to).
Or maybe it's some feeble attempt at AI that's stuck in a loop.
The following is evidence the galaxy clusters are moving through the incompressible fluid aether.
'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html
"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."
The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The 'ripple' is a gravitational wave. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.
The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.
In a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and enters and exits a single slit. It is the associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits both slits. The aether displacement wave creates wave interference upon exiting the slits. As the particle exits a single slit, it is this interference which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes a loss of coherence of the associated aether displacement wave, there is no wave interference, and the direction the particle travels is not altered.
mpc, does your ether act as a medium for the propagation of light? If it does it cannot be incompressible (i.e. A perfect fluid) since that would suggest an instantaneous propagation of kinetic force throughout. The speed of light, c would have to be infinite.
It would have to be a nearly perfect fluid or an almost incompressible ether to account for the finite speed of the propagation of light. And if the rather is compressible to even a limited extent, it has some potential for movement, that would then lead to the potential that any increase in density from displacement, would dissipate over some period of time. The overall density would always attempt to move to a uniform value.
Interesting
Uninteresting, unevidence handwaving based on nothing other than your imagination.
Not even close.
Unevidenced garbaged. Simply an uneducated daydream of an idea.
I wonder if it explains other conundra?It appears that MPCs aether answers just about every physics question ever posed.
Hey mpc!
Can the aether explain why there are idiots?
It appears that MPCs aether answers just about every physics question ever posed.
Aether displacement is a theory of everything.
'Superfluid Is Shown To Have Property Of A Solid'
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/07/990730072958.htm
'Northwestern University physicists have for the first time shown that superfluid helium-3 -- the lighter isotope of helium, which is a liquid that has lost all internal friction, allowing it to flow without resistance and ooze through tiny spaces that normal liquids cannot penetrate -- actually behaves like a solid in its ability to conduct sound waves. ... "Faraday's finding was the first indication that light and magnetism were related," says William Halperin, professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern. "I wouldn't say that our discovery is of that magnitude, but it is significant as the first observation of a previously unknown mode of wave propagation in a liquid -- one that is of the type you would expect to see in a solid."'
The aether is, or behaves similar to, a frictionless superfluid with properties of a solid.
I'm looking forward to your explanation of idiocy (based on "aether displacement") then.
Anytime you're ready... I'll just go get the popcorn.
Interesting.
This is just more of the same uninteresting fantasy garbage posted by someone that does not even understand basic high school level physics.
Last edited:
The incompressible fluid aether referred to in the following is a superfluid with properties of a solid.
'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...106.3955v2.pdf
"One proposal to address this puzzle at the semi-classical level is to decouple quantum vacuum from space-time geometry via a modification of gravity that includes an incompressible fluid, known as Gravitational Aether. In this paper, we discuss classical predictions of this theory along with its compatibility with cosmological and experimental tests of gravity. We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity. In our opinion, the fact that gravitational aether has the same number of free parameters as GR, and is yet (to our knowledge) consistent with all cosmological and precision tests of gravity at 2σ level, indicates that this theory could be a strong contender for Einstein’s theory of gravity."
Took a look at the paper, which is not endorsed and the others originally cited as authors are no longer claming ownership of the paper.
Be that as it may, how does this paper relate to your fantasy other than having the word aether in it?
'Phenomenology of Gravitational Aether as a solution to the Old Cosmological Constant Problem'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1106/1106.3955v2.pdf
"We argue that deviations from General Relativity (GR) in this theory are sourced by pressure or vorticity."
Pressure exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
BZZZZZZZZ. Nope that is not what they are saying, not even close. Everytime you put your own words into this conversation there is a major turn to the land of woo woo.
BZZZZZZZZ. Nope that is not what they are saying, not even close. Everytime you put your own words into this conversation there is a major turn to the land of woo woo.
"The best we could do is to directly compare how significant the aether pressure perturbation is compared to that of radiation. This is shown in Figure 3, from which it is evident that the correction to aether pressure is at least an order of magnitude smaller. Therefore, we conclude that the theoretical error in our analysis is insignificant compared to the experimental uncertainties."
Pressure exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Yes, I know that you believe that last inane line to be true. No, the paragraph above that line does not support your simple minded idea.