Aether Displacement

So you still can't answer my questions and you still can't read English.
Goodbye crank.

So, you still can't understand my original answer was correct.

So, you still can't understand the following is correct.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
mpc755:

mpc755 said:
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.

Since you repeat this statement with every post you make, this must be the core of your claim.

Please post evidence for this claim now. Failing that, I will lock the thread.

Thanks.
 
mpc755:



Since you repeat this statement with every post you make, this must be the core of your claim.

Please post evidence for this claim now. Failing that, I will lock the thread.

Thanks.

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid.

Aether has mass. Aether is physically displaced by matter. There is all sorts of evidence aether is physically displaced by matter.

The galaxy clusters in the following article are not traveling with non-baryonic dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through the aether. The galaxy clusters displace aether.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16739.x/abstract

"We compile a sample of 38 galaxy clusters which have both X-ray and strong lensing observations, and study for each cluster the projected offset between the dominant component of baryonic matter centre (measured by X-rays) and the gravitational centre (measured by strong lensing). Among the total sample, 45 per cent clusters have offsets [greater than]10 arcsec. The [greater than]10 arcsec separations are significant, considering the arcsecond precision in the measurement of the lensing/X-ray centres. This suggests that it might be a common phenomenon in unrelaxed galaxy clusters that gravitational field is separated spatially from the dominant component of baryonic matter. It also has consequences for lensing models of unrelaxed clusters since the gas mass distribution may differ from the dark matter distribution and give perturbations to the modelling. Such offsets can be used as a statistical tool for comparison with the results of Lambda cold dark matter ( CDM) simulations and to test the modified dynamics."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through the aether.

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The non-baryonic fluid is the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter
'http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The 'ripple' is a gravitational wave. The 'ripple' is an aether displacement wave.

The above is physical evidence of a moving 'particle' having an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and enters and exits a single slit. It is the associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits both slits. The aether displacement wave creates wave interference upon exiting the slits. As the particle exits a singel slit, it is this interference which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes a loss of coherence of the associated aether displacement wave, there is no wave interference, and the direction the particle travels is not altered.

The aether is detected every time a double slit experiment is performed.

Aether displacement explains why the Milky Way's halo is in the shape of a squished beach ball.

'Dark Halo Around Our Galaxy Looks Like Squished Beach Ball'
http://www.space.com/7746-dark-halo-galaxy-squished-beach-ball.html

"Dark matter seems to shroud the remaining visible matter in giant spheres called haloes."

The Milky Way's halo is displaced aether.

"But the new study found that the Milky Way's halo isn't exactly spherical, but squished. In fact, its beach-ball form is flattened in a surprising direction perpendicular to the galaxy's visible, pancake-shaped spiral disk."

All of the aether displaced by the Milky Way matter exerts force toward the matter. The force exerted toward the matter by the aether displaced perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy's spiral disk offset. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the spiral disk which exerts force toward the center of the galaxy. This force, along with the force associated with the state of the aether as determined by the motion of the matter of the Milky Way, forces the matter closer together which results in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

Displaced aether exerts force toward matter.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
Last edited:
Oh dear.
I foresee a thread lock in your future.

Still haven't figured out my answer to your question was correct, have you?

Still haven't figured out the following is correct, have you?

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
Still haven't figured out my answer to your question was correct, have you?
Still haven't figured out the following is correct, have you?
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Still incapable of reading or doing science?
 
Still incapable of reading or doing science?

Why is my correctly answering your question and your inability to understand my correct answer not doing science?

Is that what science means to you?

Someone correctly answers your question and since you insist the correct answer is incorrect then it can not be science?

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16739.x/abstract

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The non-baryonic fluid is the aether.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
Why is my correctly answering your question and your inability to understand my correct answer not doing science?
You consistently fail to provide evidence.
Making claims is not evidence.
This is why James R will likely lock this thread: he asked you to provide evidence for the claim "Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity" and all you did was repeat other claims - not one shred of evidence given.

Is that what science means to you?
Someone correctly answers your question and since you insist the correct answer is incorrect then it can not be science?
Someone who claims they "correctly" answer my question (and, by the way you answered none of my questions) without showing that it actually is correct isn't doing science, they're just spouting a belief.
 
You consistently fail to provide evidence.
Making claims is not evidence.
This is why James R will likely lock this thread: he asked you to provide evidence for the claim "Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity" and all you did was repeat other claims - not one shred of evidence given.


Someone who claims they "correctly" answer my question (and, by the way you answered none of my questions) without showing that it actually is correct isn't doing science, they're just spouting a belief.

You asked a question. I answered it correctly. You insist the correct answer is incorrect.

Just as you are unable to understand the correctness of the following.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
You asked a question. I answered it correctly.
You didn't answer MY question.

You insist the correct answer is incorrect.
You don't understand English.

Just as you are unable to understand the correctness of the following.
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
And you can't provide evidence for that claim.
 
You didn't answer MY question.

Of course I did. Since, for the second time, you did not understand my correct answer you have resorted to this delusional denial state.

Just as you are in denial of the correctness of the following.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
Of course I did.
Wrong again. You gave a reply using your own figures.

Just as you are in denial of the correctness of the following.
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Can you show that this is true?
Can you explain why this is not supported by observation?
 
Wrong again. You gave a reply using your own figures
Wow!

I used your figures in my correct response which you did not understand.

This was your original question which I answered correctly.

"Tell me, which exerts the greater "gravitational force" (according to your "theory"): 1 megatonne of feathers or 1 megatonne of lead?"

Your are so delusional you're making stuff up which is easily refuted on the thread.

It is understandable why you are unable to understand the correctness of the following.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
Wow!
I used your figures in my correct response which you did not understand.
Yeah?
At a given distance, say 100 km, it doesn't matter whether the megatonne is 1 km in diameter or 5 km.

This was your original question which I answered correctly.
Claimed you answered correctly.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Repeated stupidity.
 

This was your question.

"Tell me, which exerts the greater "gravitational force" (according to your "theory"): 1 megatonne of feathers or 1 megatonne of lead?"

This was my correct response which you said was incorrect.

"In this gedanken the volumes under discussion are spherical.

Aether is displaced based on mass per volume. If the feather and the lead occupy the same volume then the same amount of aether is displaced from the volume which means there is the same amount of force exerted by the displaced aether toward the volume. Since the force exerted by the displaced aether toward the volume is gravity the gravitational force in this scenario is the same.

If the feathers occupy less three dimensional space then the lead does then the force of the displaced aether at the surface of the volume consisting of the feathers is greater than the same distance from the center of the lead. The reason for this is there is less aether in the volume consisting of the feathers, which means more aether is displaced from the volume consisting of the feathers, which means there is more force exerted by the displaced aether at the surface of the feathers. Since force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity the gravitational force at the surface of the feathers is greater then the same distance from the center of the lead.

If the lead occupies less three dimensional space then the feathers do then there is more displaced aether exerting force toward the surface of the lead then there is an equal distance from the center of the feathers. Since gravity is force exerted by displaced aether toward matter and there is more displaced aether exerting force toward the surface of the lead then there is exerted an equal distance from the center of the feathers there is greater gravitational force exerted toward the surface of the lead then there is an equal distance from the center of the feathers."


Just as you incorrectly thought my correct answer was incorrect, you are unable to understand the correctness of the following.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
You're a waste of time.
You cannot provide evidence, all you're capable of is repeating the same unproven claims word for word.
 
You're a waste of time.
You cannot provide evidence, all you're capable of is repeating the same unproven claims word for word.

If you simply choose to incorrectly state something which is correct is incorrect doesn't make it incorrect.

It's the same with the correctness of the following.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
 
If you simply choose to incorrectly state something which is correct is incorrect doesn't make it incorrect.
If you simply state that something is correct without providing evidence and showing that it is correct that doesn't actually make it correct.
Get the picture?
 
If you simply state that something is correct without providing evidence and showing that it is correct that doesn't actually make it correct.
Get the picture?

If I answer your question correctly and you insist the correct answer is incorrect doesn't mean the correct answer is incorrect.

Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.

Get the picture?
 
Yes, unfortunately you're also incapable of putting 2 and 2 together.
I have already shown how you are incorrect by pointing out that we have methods of ascertaining values of g.
G varies with mass, not volume. As observed, measured and verified.
 
Back
Top