None of your links mention aether, you simply interpret it as aether, thus your links do not justify your claims. Furthermore your links do not pertain to pilot wave theory, which is related to quantum mechanics, not dark matter. Things like Bohm's work on pilot waves do not provide justification for an aether, you are simply interpreting anything as aether.
If all you can do is quote random articles and then say "See here where it says something which isn't aether, if you replace that with aether than it's talking about aether!" then you really haven't got a leg to stand on.
Changing the labels on things doesn't make you right. I could just as easily say :
The 'pond' consists of love. The moving 'particles' are the pixie thoughts. The 'ripple' is a elephant dreams. The 'ripple' is an angel sneeze.
There, physical evidence for pixies and angels! And elephants!
You use nothing but relabellings and slights of hands involving analogies. No science involved.
Then why can't it model anything? Why can't it do anything? Why can't you provide its base axioms and derive results? Why can't you do anything other than change words from other people's work? Why can't you answer direct relevant questions? Why do you think you'll accomplish anything by dishonest and ignorance (aside from the fact it works for Sarah Palin)?
Let's discuss 'dark matter' for a moment. Dark matter exists in the vacuum of space and creates a ripple when galaxy clusters collide.
How does dark matter not exist in the vacuum a double slit experiment can be performed in?
Is dark matter virtual? Does dark matter have more of your absolutely absurd ridiculous notions associated with it all in order for you to remain ignorant of understanding what occurs physically in nature?
How does this same physical phenomenon which occurs when galaxy clusters collide not occur in a double slit experiment? How are galaxy clusters able to create a ripple in the dark matter when they collide at the same time a particle moving through the dark matter in a double slit experiment does not create a ripple in the dark matter? In a double slit experiment, the moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. The particle enters and exits a single slit and the associated dark matter displacement wave enters and exits both.
Where the concept of non-baryonic dark matter is incorrect is there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter gravitationally bound to matter.
The reason why galaxy clusters are able to create the ripple is because the galaxy clusters are not moving with non-baryonic dark matter. The galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether.
If non-baryonic dark matter moved with galaxy clusters there would not be an offset between the light lensing through the space neighboring the moving galaxy clusters and the galaxy clusters themselves. The reason why there is an offset between the light lensing through the space neighboring moving galaxy clusters and the galaxy clusters themselves is because the galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether.
Just as the Milky Way, the solar system, and the Earth move through and displace the aether, so does the particle in a double slit experiment.
The reason why a particle is able to create an interference pattern in a double slit experiment is because the moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave.
de Broglie, the person who first understood wave-particle duality, understood it correctly.
"any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium"
The "energetic contact" with a hidden medium de Broglie refers to is the displacement of the aether by the particle.
opcorn:
