Aether Displacement
- Thread starter mpc755
- Start date
It is the mass of the matter which determines the force of the displaced aether exerted toward the matter.
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
So your earlier claim was in error?
Thank you.
The more mass in a given volume does affect the force of gravitation proportional to that volume. While mass density is not the direct cause of gravity it is a measure of the total mass involved.
Gravitational force is proportional to the total mass involved and the distance between the center of the total involved mass and the point at which the gravitational force is to be determined.
I believe I earlier expressed my opinion on the issue of aether displacement and gravity... It is a terribly flawed model and is not consistent with experience, unless one includes imagination, dreams and nightmares as experience.
Yep, that's my claim (albeit badly expressed due to the way the questions were phrased).
Flaws mpc refuses to address.
No, you've explained what you think happens. You haven't presented any evidence.
That's the very definition of baseless faith.
I understood the paper you linked to, I'm certain you did not. I offered to discuss it with you but you've ignored that request.
Such obvious deceptions on your part make it obvious you know you are in the losing position but you can't admit it.
'God did it' provides no testable predictions, just like your 'aether did it'. Saying 'virtual particles did it' leads to predictions.
You are so desperate to avoid admitting even the slightest mistake you're laughable.
Straw man. Misrepresenting the mainstream model, after you've had it explained to you, particularly to the person who explained it to you, is so obviously desperate it's amazing you think it'll work.
You say physics is screwed up, while using a computer built using quantum mechanics to communicate across the internet, initially developed by CERN, via electromagnetics understood by Maxwell.
You are using an achievement of physics to complain about physics.
Translation : "Aether did it". You're a preacher for aether, with nothing more to say than "Aether did it".
Then you understand the greater the mass of the matter per volume the greater the gravitational force exerted toward that mass.
The reason for this is the greater the mass of the matter per volume the less aether the volume contains the greater the force of the displaced aether exerted toward the matter.
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Volume has nothing to with it.
No.
No.
To quote your own words:
NOT density.mpc755 said:
The following is the correct definition of what occurs physically in nature to cause gravity.
Force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity.
Gravitational force is proportional to the total aether displaced and the distance between the center of the total involved matter and the point at which the gravitational force is to be determined.
The greater the mass of the matter involved the greater the displacement of the aether. The greater the displacement of the aether the greater the force exerted by the displaced aether toward the matter.
Maxwell's displacement current is a physical displacement of the aether.
The reason why I used mass of the matter per volume is to explain the more aether displaced by the matter the greater the force exerted by the displaced aether toward the matter.
Using volume helps to visualize the more matter which exists within the volume the less aether there is in the volume, the greater the displacement of the aether which would otherwise exist in the volume the greater the force exerted by the displaced aether toward the matter, which is the gravitational force.
In other words you're spouting drivel.
Tell me, which exerts the greater "gravitational force" (according to your "theory"): 1 megatonne of feathers or 1 megatonne of lead?
In this gedanken the volumes under discussion are spherical.
Aether is displaced based on mass per volume. If the feather and the lead occupy the same volume then the same amount of aether is displaced from the volume which means there is the same amount of force exerted by the displaced aether toward the volume. Since the force exerted by the displaced aether toward the volume is gravity the gravitational force in this scenario is the same.
If the feathers occupy less three dimensional space then the lead does then the force of the displaced aether at the surface of the volume consisting of the feathers is greater than the same distance from the center of the lead. The reason for this is there is less aether in the volume consisting of the feathers, which means more aether is displaced from the volume consisting of the feathers, which means there is more force exerted by the displaced aether at the surface of the feathers. Since force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity the gravitational force at the surface of the feathers is greater then the same distance from the center of the lead.
If the lead occupies less three dimensional space then the feathers do then there is more displaced aether exerting force toward the surface of the lead then there is an equal distance from the center of the feathers. Since gravity is force exerted by displaced aether toward matter and there is more displaced aether exerting force toward the surface of the lead then there is exerted an equal distance from the center of the feathers there is greater gravitational force exerted toward the surface of the lead then there is an equal distance from the center of the feathers.
In other words your "theory" does not agree with observed results.
Please account for this discrepancy.
For the zillionth time of asking.
What part does not agree with observed results, or are you thinking the greater the mass in a particular volume does not affect the gravitational force exerted toward that volume again?
At a given distance, say 100 km, it doesn't matter whether the megatonne is 1 km in diameter or 5 km.
Ever seen:
Where does volume come into it?
At a given distance, say 100 km, it doesn't matter whether the megatonne is 1 km in diameter or 5 km.
Ever seen:
Where does volume come into it?
Why don't you actually accurately read what I wrote.
If the lead volume has a radius of 100km and the feathers has a radius of 500km then the gravitational force of the lead volume at 100km from the center of the lead is greater than the gravitational force exerted toward the feathers at 100km from the center of the feathers.
And that is exactly what I wrote.
The reason for this is there is less aether contained within the 100km volume from the center of the lead then there is in the 100km volume from the center of the feathers. This means there is more displaced aether exerting force toward the center of the lead 100km from the center of the lead volume than there is 100km from the center of the feathers. Since force exerted by displaced aether toward matter is gravity, there is greater gravitational force exerted toward the lead 100km from the center of the lead than there is 100km from the center of the feathers.
Before you are once again incorrect in your post, go back and read what I wrote.
Last edited:
I not only read it I quoted it.
Um, no. You wrote what I quoted.
And please try to address my example: lead 500 metres radius, feathers 2500 metres radius, at a 100 km distance.
Inane diversion.
What about at 1,000 km radius from each?
Please stop lying.
And please address my question re the oberved, measured and verified equation. Where is volume mentioned in that equation?