Squirrel,
went to that link..found some verses they claim is evidence for your comment..read them..looked in my bible..again i say that it was MAN not god that wrote or said those things..
Agree, it was man. But man was claiming and many still do that these were the story of us. The story of creation etc. This has been the justification for the religion and a specific notion of what and who god is.
People have tried to move away from the bible being the word of god because of discoveries that clearly contradict it. So if that is the case.
Then what god are you believing in. It can't be the god of the bible. Because it can't be both right and so wrong in so many ways.
“ Again, ignorance of the day is not an excuse when dealing with the supposed words of god. ”
there is that phrase again..'words of god'
this is a Literal view of the bible..
of what i can recall.. there are only two instinces in the bible of where it said god actually wrote one is the ten commandments and the other was when david saw the writing on the wall...those can be considered 'words of god'..
Here, from this link:
http://www.believers.org/believe/bel191.htm
Divinely Inspired
The Scriptures, both the Old and New Testaments, are verbally inspired of God and are the revelation of God to man, the infallible, authoritative rule of faith and conduct.
By the inspiration of the Scriptures we mean that "special divine influence on the minds of the writers of the Bible, in virtue of which their production, apart from errors in transcription, and when rightly interpreted, together constitute an infallible rule of faith and practice."
2 TIMOTHY 3:16 NKJ
16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
The above phrase, given by inspiration of God, translates a single Greek word. Literally the word means God-breathed. The words divinely inspired have probably the nearest English equivalent meaning.
God breathed into man what man breathed out.
2 PETER 1:20-21 NIV
20 Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation.
21 For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
2 PETER 1:21 NEB
21 For it was not through any human whim that men prophesied of old; men they were, but, impelled by the Holy Spirit, they spoke the words of God.
HEBREWS 1:1 NKJ
1 God, who at various times and in different ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets.
1 THESSALONIANS 2:13 NKJ
13 . . . when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe.
Truly Recorded
Although everything in the Bible is truly recorded, everything said in the Bible is not the truth.
For example, the Bible contains statements made by the devil and those who were against God. The statements they made are not necessarily true, but they truly said the statements as recorded.
So, we can trust the Bible -- all of it -- as God's message to us.
Purpose Of Bible
The purpose of the Bible is to reveal God to mankind, and get us to come to God through Jesus Christ, so we can know Him.
JOHN 1:1,14 NKJ
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father . . . .
LUKE 24:27 NKJ
27 And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.
JOHN 20:31 NKJ
31 but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name.
Such errors in the book should not occur if god inspired. ”
have you ever tried to communicate something you barely understood??
Yes, and I pre-empted everything with " I barely understand this myself so If you want more detailed or accurate information, do some research "
“ So if you claim the book is not the word of god but god inspired your just laying all of the blame/errors in the book on man. ”
correct
So if man confused and screwed up these revelations so badly, couldn't he just have easily confused the belief in Jesus as the son of god instead of just a mortal man ?
Would god allow for such an error which would cast doubt on the reader. Makes no sense. Does it ? ”
I think maybe hes trying to teach us what faith is...
Well this is the common response and guess you would have to figure out if it makes sense that he would plant all of this evidence to confuse us. Not only would he have done this as a trick, but he made it bloody hard for us who are apparently the tools of the trick to find the evidence. I mean, we are finding new discoveries all the time but it's not like he just laid the bones out there one day.
I think for all of us, the questions are the most important, because often there is no answer, so the best question can leave us with the closest answer. That can be changed by new or better information of course.
“ The religious texts are finite in what they can offer and those are in many ways valuable, but they are not mean't to be taken literally and yet people do. ”
i dont agree with the finite part..but the rest i do..
In finite I mean the book is written. It's not a book that is mean't to be changed with new discoveries.
“ They are the words of men and provide no real justification for the belief of god as an entity described in their texts. ”
communication is the justification, they had communicated a sense of who/what god is supposed to be..sure they have had experiances with god..but they are still humans and as such are susceptible to their own humanity..i am 95% sure that each of them added their own 'flavor' to the mix..
also there is an element of he needs to teach us one thing before we can understand another...so maybe what is in the bible is what ppl needed to learn...( this is where i ponder a third testament..)
Ok, but by that reasoning it was mans doing that people like myself don't accept the texts as god breathed or god given. I don't see how god would have allowed that to occur.
You would think that if god divinely offered these words to men that he could make sure it was translated correctly.
I think it makes more sense considering the magnitude of the errors in the creation story alone that these are not the words of god, divinely offered in any way, man was not only the writer, he was the creator of the story.
If that is the case, which is what I believe, there is no justification in the texts for the belief.
At some point, people either believe they are the words of god or god given or not. If you believe the former, then you have to deal with the contradications, rationalize them etc.
It's for each of us to figure out.