Because for most people, God doesn't talk back.
Because for most people, God doesn't talk back.
“ Originally Posted by jpappl
Yes. But that ship has sailed for any religions notion of god. ”
i reiterate...god is not religious.
AND, that's not true. for example, where in the bible does it describe someone interacting with, learning from, or experiencing god from reading a book?
i think it's the other way around spider. most people would rather read books and debate about god than experience god, and most people would rather be a member of an institution and attend a service on sunday, follow some rules, or keep up appearances, than to actually humble themselves enough to have an ongoing relationship with god.
Squirrel,
The historical facts don't prove their is a god and really have nothing to do with the notion.
Where or when has science proved the religious text prove there is a god ?
That would be news to me. I am assuming you are talking about historical reference which has nothing to do with evidence for God.
Proving god's existence would be the greatest discovery ever. It wouldn't change what we have done and it wouldn't change what we have learned through science, but of course it would have a massive impact on us as a species.
If it's the bible or the quran or any other religious texts, what is the certainty that I have that the information in the text is the word of god ?
If it's not, what am I believing in and why ?
It I believe it is, what justification do I have to accept this considering the contradictions with reality ?
If I am not using a religious text for my faith, what kind of god is it ? Does it really have any say in any individuals life ?
etc etc.
Adstar,
The message is one thing. The actual claims which the message is built around are bogus. So the message can be of great value to humanity, but the claims do nothing to prove their is a god and not only don't offer a justification for the belief, they offer evidence against the belief.
It's not worth it. None of us have the truth market cornered.
I don't claim to reject messages from religious texts, there is of course value in them, I reject the notion they prove god and that they are filled with the words of god.
Which one is right and why would god allow so many to be proposed ?
well there you go. and now for some reason that religion has become a substitute for the interaction itself. why is
that?
If there is a God, and you talk to him, it is not unreasonable to assume other people have talked to him and wrote down their thoughts in the texts that created Religion.
several times you have changed the question to mean 'proof of god'
see below...
really? how would it impact us?? jesus did exist and what he fought against still exists today..ppl tend to do what they want and justify after the fact..the only thing i can think of it affecting us is there would be a sharp increase in the amount of suicides...
it is not the bible alone that confirms or denies the existance of god,the bible is stories to pass on to consider and reflect when the situations in your life parallel with it.
MAN has tried to make it something more than it is, to justify their own worthyness
god has given each of us a piece of the puzzle (what its all about)
it doesnt do any good to argue 'my piece doesnt look like your piece so that means my piece is wrong..' we must discuss the differances without bringing in our own feelings of worthyness..
the bible helps with trying to figure out where our piece goes..
so again..its not one is more right than the other..its about discovering what it is that god really wants from us..not what man wants from us..
and i believe if we were to study the koran and other religious texts as much as the bible has been studied we will find some pieces to the puzzle in them also..
anyway im rambling..
Adstar,
First of all thanks for not quoting scripture.
That is correct. It is both of our choices. But in being happy to give me the opportunity, it boils down to preaching the gospel and not offering me justification for your own belief, why you believe short of the scripture.
Step back away from that
and tell me what your justification is because the bible can not be the word of god unless you accept that everything we have learned from our scientific discoveries are lies.
The message is one thing. The actual claims which the message is built around are bogus. So the message can be of great value to humanity, but the claims do nothing to prove their is a god and not only don't offer a justification for the belief, they offer evidence against the belief.
The message has the power to change attitudes so does any self help book or any other inspirational book.
How is it the word of god if it's rife with errors. Explain please.
Well you don't know me and I have no reason to lie. I have friends that are christian and muslim, people who I respect and interact with all the time.
I also don't like to discuss religion and politics with them too much, as that is not an area of common ground in which we interact.
But we do discuss it, just not going to ruin our friendships over it.
It's not worth it. None of us have the truth market cornered.
The question can be turned around, do you have respect for me as an atheist ?
I can't prove something does not exist correct.
The justification is not for me, it's for you, what justification do you have for the belief based on reason. There is none, only faith that there is a god.
I don't claim to reject messages from religious texts, there is of course value in them, I reject the notion they prove god and that they are filled with the words of god.
This is not just you against atheists. If you choose a religious text to be devoted to, it's you against all of the other religions notions of who and what god is.
Which one is right and why would god allow so many to be proposed ?
To test your faith ?
If so, then everyone else is just here for your entertainment.
That's vanity.
So says you and if there was a god I am sure it would not be.
But that isn't what the religious believe.
It's the other way around. The texts are supposed to be filled with the words of god. This is where the understanding comes in. The interactions in the book are with god itself but the stories are passed on and believed and accepted by the faithful via the book
Thus, the book is the justification for the belief for billions. They aren't claiming a direct interaction with god. They are accepting these other peoples words only.
My issue is the book, which is supposed to be the words of god has a dilemma, because it has been proven to be full of errors.
So where does that leave the faithful.
Most reasonable people, understanding this paradox either choose not to believe or believe the books are not the words of god.
Which is why I started an op a while back asking people this. Many danced around the first question. Is their religious text the word of god ? but couldn't help but come back and start quoting from it.
Which is meaninless to me as evidence of god.
Like you said, god isn't or shouldn't be religious.
If there is a God I want him to talk to me and explain to me how he came to exist .... .Because for most people, God doesn't talk back.
Here is a statement of a person with a hatred for the love of the truth.
Just because you hate the message does not disqualify it as resion enough.
your real arrogant superior attitudes come out under the cover of the Internet.
You mean you do not have the courage too be an arrogant pig to their faces.
Oh but it is worth it in here RIGHT. Where your anonymous and your not dependant on the social network.
Of course I have no respect for any human being,
If there is a God I want him to talk to me and explain to me how he came to exist .... .
If there is a God I want him to talk to me and explain to me how he came to exist .... .
Originally Posted by jpappl
Adstar,
First of all thanks for not quoting scripture. ”
Here is a statement of a person with a hatred for the love of the truth.
“ That is correct. It is both of our choices. But in being happy to give me the opportunity, it boils down to preaching the gospel and not offering me justification for your own belief, why you believe short of the scripture. ”
Scripture can be a justification within itself. Just because you hate the message does not disqualify it as resion enough.
“ Step back away from that ”
NO.
“ and tell me what your justification is because the bible can not be the word of god unless you accept that everything we have learned from our scientific discoveries are lies. ”
Nope. But the conclusions you are drawing for the discoveries of science that there is not God are indeed lies.
The message is one thing. The actual claims which the message is built around are bogus. So the message can be of great value to humanity, but the claims do nothing to prove their is a god and not only don't offer a justification for the belief, they offer evidence against the belief. ”
Once again the Message can in itself justify belief in God. And they do not offer evidence against God.
“ The message has the power to change attitudes so does any self help book or any other inspirational book.
How is it the word of god if it's rife with errors. Explain please. ”
I don't believe it is.
Well you don't know me and I have no reason to lie. I have friends that are christian and muslim, people who I respect and interact with all the time. ”
I still don't believe you. This forum allows a level of anonymity that allows people to truly express their real opinions. You can put up a fake show of respect in the "real world", but your real arrogant superior attitudes come out under the cover of the Internet.
I also don't like to discuss religion and politics with them too much, as that is not an area of common ground in which we interact. ”
You mean you do not have the courage too be an arrogant pig to their faces.
“ But we do discuss it, just not going to ruin our friendships over it. ”
Of course in the real world you need to use your social contacts to get ahead in the material world. Isn't that right. So you make "friends" of the people you have contempt for, for you own personal gain.
It's not worth it. None of us have the truth market cornered. ”
Oh but it is worth it in here RIGHT. Where your anonymous and your not dependant on the social network.
“ The question can be turned around, do you have respect for me as an atheist ? ”
Of course I have no respect for any human being, God is the only one worthy of respect. Because respect means bowing ones head to the other. There is no way that i am going to place disbelief as being equal to belief in God,
I tolerate men and hope for them.
“ I can't prove something does not exist correct.
The justification is not for me, it's for you, what justification do you have for the belief based on reason. There is none, only faith that there is a god. ”
I did say that i had received confirmations outside the Bible. So no it is not only the scriptures that my belief is based on. Oh and i have seen the way Lori_7 has been mocked and denigrated when she revealed her Non biblical experiences. You all called her either crazy, delusional or a liar. See it matters not a jot if i give you my non biblical experiences your pride ensures that you will discount any other justification because deep down you don't want to believe. Because the Word of God either offends you or you see it as foolishness.
“ I don't claim to reject messages from religious texts, there is of course value in them, I reject the notion they prove god and that they are filled with the words of god. ”
Ha Ha Ha then you reject the most basic message of the Bible. That there is a God.
“ This is not just you against atheists. If you choose a religious text to be devoted to, it's you against all of the other religions notions of who and what god is. ”
So what? And it is the Word of God against atheism and false religion. It is not the Word of God against atheists and followers of false religion. Got to get that distinction right you know.
Which one is right and why would god allow so many to be proposed ?
To test your faith ? ”
I answered that one before on more than one occasion. God allows false religion to allow people who believe there is a God but who have a hatred for the Love of the Truth a path that they agree with that leads to nowhere.
“ If so, then everyone else is just here for your entertainment.
That's vanity. ”
No. I am here to give an opportunity to seekers to have the option to consider the Word of God. The fact that most of the atheist posters on this forum have closed their minds to it makes not a jot of difference. There are many others who visit here and other believers in God who visit here who are not so overcome with arrogance and hate for the love of the truth. Also even the most proud and pompous atheist can experience life-changing moments in the future. So maybe in the future when they are more open to the truth they will remember the seed that was planted here on these boards.
J, the fact that the book alone is the basis of belief for many completely contradicts what it says in that very book!!!
AND you are basing your beliefs regarding god's existance on the book alone just like they are!
No, I am not.
I am challenging their reasons and justification for the belief when it comes from the texts.
I am challenging the notion that god is the entity described in the texts.
I don't have a problem with the idea of god, I have a problem with:
It's this god, from this text and this is the only path.
Lori, this is what people have been fighting over and debating for thousands of years, killing each other because one side doesn't believe the same way the other side does and they all claim they are right.
These texts are the reference for all of the excursions against each other, whether opposing religions, gays, blacks, browns, women, you name it.
What kind of god would allow for such nonsense.
Either someone is right or they are all wrong. The texts indicate to me they are all wrong.
That still doesn't exclude the possibility of a god however. Just not the entity that anyone thinks is described in their texts.
I am challenging their reasons and justification for the belief when it comes from the texts.
I am challenging the notion that god is the entity described in the texts.
I don't have a problem with the idea of god, I have a problem with:
It's this god, from this text and this is the only path.
Lori, this is what people have been fighting over and debating for thousands of years, killing each other because one side doesn't believe the same way the other side does and they all claim they are right.
These texts are the reference for all of the excursions against each other, whether opposing religions, gays, blacks, browns, women, you name it.
What kind of god would allow for such nonsense.
Either someone is right or they are all wrong. The texts indicate to me they are all wrong.
That still doesn't exclude the possibility of a god however. Just not the entity that anyone thinks is described in their texts.
God is more than we can ever figure out..
God is more than we can ever figure out
That goes along with "God works in mysterious ways."
Jesus never taught anyone to hate each other j. Never. So instead of focusing so hard on all of the negativity perpetuated by PEOPLE twisting scripture, why don't you just find out for yourself? Take a look around in the world j. There's some stupid hateful motherfuckers out there. You really want them making this decision for you?