Well ,actually, guys I didnt see any "debunking " of 911 prophecy . Just flaming.
I was kinda familiar with usenets a bit ago - it's kinda hard to forge (because mesages pass through many hubs ,and are archieved locally on many computers ,so its practically impossbile to forge things like that if any scrutiny happens -e.g just checking a few independent archives) . though imho its indeed should be done -I am not very familiar of how google makes its archive ,but it could be very well possible to forge the messages .
Sollog imho is very suspicious (his site ,money he asks -clearly a scammer) . But still..... If its indeed not forged. You know ,guys, odds making prediction on 9/11 on the exact day, 3 years ago , then those prediction confirmed (xeno could be very well exactly same person as sollog ,but still it doesnt explain how sollog had any clue first place about it) - well odds are running very slim. He stated date and place - imho pretty solid.
Well now those earhtquakes he -states LA/NY 7.0++ . "very soon" . That kinda prediction which states exact nature of disaster and exact place . You know odds of predicting this stuff in a timeframe of 1-5 years are practically impossible . Well it these indeed happen anytime soon ( e.g. in next 5 years) .That imho would be sufficient proof of something .
Heh I am still puzzled by this 9/11 prediction .If it will be proven thats its not forged in any way... Still could be coincidence - you know 911 number is for actual emergency in US. And actual terrorists could very well planned this thing for this date (and not 9/10 or 9/12) -just for some kind of evil irony.
p.s. I am sceptic and atheist , but guys let's be objective - no one actually in this thread debunked this prohecy .Sollog could be very well scammer and cheater ,but so far I did't see anyone caught him by hand with this prediction. He could cheat and lie all the way around ,but in this *specific* case no trace of scam/fraud is found so far.
p.s.s. I am kinda thinking about usenet server forging. You know usenet is not exactly "hack proof" -having open architecture and stuff....