I see everything.
Define "astronomical".Originally posted by Jahiro
...when you study earthquakes, if you consider these events and the likelihood of 7.0+ quakes occuring in those specific cities in that amount of time after each other, the odds are ASTRONOMICAL
Originally posted by goofyfish
In that case, your self-loathing must be nearly unbearable.
Peace.
Originally posted by goofyfish
Define "astronomical".
State the odds.
Please show your work.
:m: Peace.
Originally posted by okinrus
Jahiro it is common for false prophets to have contact with demons and so they may be able to predict something evil before it happens. Another posibility is that Sollog heard about something being planed by muslim extremist. Or the more likely possibility that the news server was hacked into and the message(s) were somehow forged.
GollosOriginally posted by tablariddim
BTW, Sollog spelt backwards makes Gollos
I know enough to reconize one. Loud abusive, with no real teaching. What this world does not need is more catastrophies but repentance. God will raise up a prophet speaking repentance first and only after there is no repentance will God bring catastrophy. Some one who is a real prophet would not have such abusive and rude followers. A prophet would certainly not require payment to recieve his prophesies.Contact with demons... you an expert on false prophets?
Give me the description of the prophesy.Did Sollog also hear about the earthquakes he predicted being planned by a muslim extremist? Enlighten me.
It's possible. People can spoof email etc. The archive could have been corrupted by hackers etc. I looked back on it and it's not the only message about this but I don't believe anything without questioning it.News server, being usenet or google groups, has timestamped messages and they can't be altered or forged. That's the beauty of usenet. Plus there were hundreds to thousands of users who saw his 902 prophecy and Xino's 911 thread on the respective dates they were posted... What, do you think they sat back and made hundreds of accounts so they can go into their own thread, forge replies, and then somehow hack into the system so it looked like people actually cared about the thread or what they posted? Jeez, use your head people
Originally posted by Jahiro
This is undeniable PROOF that 911 was FORETOLD of and DOCUMENTED on the Net.
It was archived on google, and it's date is timestamped which means it is authentic (if you really want to confirm this, call up usenet).
The warning came from Sollog and was issued on 9/11/1998 three years to the exact date of 911
Here's the Link
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6tb7rp$gvr$1@winter.news.erols.com
Yet so few know about this...
I wonder why
Sollog's homepage, in case you're interested now, is at www.sollog.com
-Jahiro
The post in Google was made in 1998 and reffering to 1998, not 2001. Stop being a sheep.Originally posted by Jahiro
There WAS an attack in 2001 and that is the REASON the post is relevant. Boy a bunch of braindead monkeys in sciforums.