i can express my opinion and do when i'm asked or think it's relevant, but i in no way think it's my responsibility to convince anyone of anything. i'm a very honest person, and believe me, i tried like hell to convey my experiences, but not many (if any) could relate really. i would also not suggest it prudent that someone would take my word for anything. my testimony is just that...mine. people need their own experience, and i can't make it happen for anyone else.
thanks as that was a straight up answer.
my question is, if we communicate an experience, is it not prudent to use words we can each agree on to understand what you experienced?
it is my opinion that you can't truly believe without knowing.
that is my point. Of course we all experience many of the same 'feelings' and emotions, even some of the same inner experiences (deja vu) but to articulate them occurrances, before making claims, each should at least try and learn the knowledge and language to convey the opinion so others can comprehend.
what was seen in prophecies are not my real question for example of theology; it is that i question the words used to articulate what was seen (eg.... there is no such thing as seven headed dragons in the 21st century)
saying 'i spoke with God' is not being fair; as god could be zeus to some and and the sun to another, so that frame of conveyance is unrealistic but a metaphorical rendition (opinion; unfounded in knowing or reason, just opinion of what was felt from the experience)
maybe if people would realize that, they would stop wasting time on opinions and egos and an intellect, and actually experience something that would change them forever.
sounds like a buddha or krishna claim
i say, we experiencing at each moment and it is the intellect that can isolate the truth from being the actual explaination. Point being, all can experience; and the growth to comprehend them is by seeking answers rather than believing opinions.
Most legends came from the core of a storied opinion but reality only works ONE way; all cases
i think that desire causes them, but who places the desires in my heart?
ah..... the 'intent' of life. Has no magical implementation by a source. The rule is of life itself, to continue; like the wave rolling thru a pond.
i've been inclined to think that freewill is at play.
that is what our choices show us, as we define even the term and title, 'free willy' to convey that ideology.
god knows what's going on inside you. it's intentions, desire, humility, honest seeking of knowledge. i call it prayer, you call it entanglement,
prayer?
i know god aint some dude controlling existence and using prayers to do it
but in reality, energy has a potential that affects mass over time and space.
some call it a collective conscious.
collective conscious is when many are 'collectively aware'
but it seems you back on some 'other' (away from NOW) as being that associating conscious, i guess
all i know is that it seems in my case that i asked for it and i got it.
Wow!
the majority on the globe praying for 'it' and you got it and no one know it
perhaps its the wrong sh
i really can't help but think intentions are key.
intentions is where choice finds its root
ask yourself why you want to know.
so that other can know too
the answer to that may be, do i really want to know this?
i asked myself that question 30yrs back almost
then there is more to learn,
especially, since god didn't tell you at your last meeting
my opinion is to seek the truth.
for conscious mind; i could see that
but what about life itself?