Zionist piracy

[Mr.Spock]

non sequiter

now where did I say to attack unarmed civilians or Israelis.

You said if its justice then the country should be destroyed. Why would a normal human being would even suggest such a thing?

 

[S.A.M.]

im saying those ships are old. It makes more sense they broke down then we somehow magically sabotaged them miles away.

They've done it before, haven't they? What was the name of the ship that was to bring Palestinian refugees which was sunk by the Israelis?

 

[Mr.Spock]

I believe my hat is very smart, thank you very much.

I think it is you who is missing the point.

No im not. I was given the response I thought I would get aka "Ausgurd" and "Dude".

 

[pjdude1219]

You said if its justice then the country should be destroyed. Why would a normal human being would even suggest such a thing?

because normal human beings get rid of threats to peace. and normal people put down a rabid dog.

 

[Mr.Spock]

Maybe you'd do better if you provided some context to your posts. It would save a lot of follow-up questions.



I take it back. I don't have zero evidence. I have read in many places that the ships were in international waters. Hence my prima facie conclusion.

Now, what was your basis of saying this was legal, again?

So you do have ZERO evidence.

 

[CheskiChips]

Oh dear, this just gets better and better.

If that is the case, and if we are going to use your ridiculous argument, then one could say that those Turkish boats also did not break any laws and by your definition, should not have been stormed by Israeli troops at all.

At the end of the day, the laws of the sea include signed treaties and international laws, as well as customary laws. Now, Israel is either a part of the International communities which respects such laws or it remains on the outside and should be treated as outsiders and given no rights at all.. Which means that we can disregard its very existence. Now, which is it? Is Israel a part of the International community and thus, respect the laws of the International community? Or does Israel consider itself to be on the outside and thus, should be granted no rights or standing as a State?

Thats a bunch of mishigas, I'm not going to bother fixing it.

 

[Mr.Spock]

They've done it before, haven't they? What was the name of the ship that was to bring Palestinian refugees which was sunk by the Israelis?

How can we possibly sabotage a ship miles away? get serious.

 

[Mr.Spock]

because normal human beings get rid of threats to peace. and normal people put down a rabid dog.

By blowing up unarmed civilians against international Law?

So this isn't about one single boat is it?

 

[S.A.M.]

How can we possibly sabotage a ship miles away? get serious.

Found it:

In 1988, when the PLO organized a ship named "The Return" to be sent to Israel with Palestinian refugees, Israel chose a different method to stop it. It sent Mossad agents and Naval commandos to Cyprus to sabotage the ship before the passengers had embarked. The ship was damaged but no one was hurt.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diploma...-forgotten-the-lessons-of-the-exodus-1.293391

Just read it yesterday.

 

[James R]

Do you criticize every single thing you ever see on tv with this comb?

Sorry. I don't understand how combs are relevant. Please explain.

Israel didn't sign any agreements to defined what behaviors could take place on international waters, ergo they didn't violate international law.

I wrote you a post correcting you on this point yesterday. Did you (a) not see it, (b) ignore it, (c) forget it, or what?

So you do have ZERO evidence.

No. Go back and read my previous post. Take your time. I also asked you a question there. You must have missed it.

 

[pjdude1219]

So you do have ZERO evidence.

Hows this for evidence(James please correct me if my information is wrong) the ships were attacked 70 miles out from Israel. A state can only act to prevent for immigration and the such in an area that includes teritorial waters and the contigenious zone which generally combine to extend out 24 nautical miles from the baseline of the tide. anything farther out cannot be boarded unless it is infringing on the economic resources. being 70 miles out puts them out side of the zone where Israel could act legally therefore their actions are a violation of international law.

 

[pjdude1219]

By blowing up unarmed civilians against international Law?

huh your twisting around like a drunken sailer has confused me what are you focusing in on now?

So this isn't about one single boat is it?

Yeah it is unless you mean my statement that if Israel thinks attacking unarmed civilians is justice than no its about being a decent human being.

 

[James R]

Thanks pj.

Over to Mr Spock for refutation - if he has any, of course.

 

[Mr.Spock]

Found it:



Just read it yesterday.

So you are saying we sent Mossad agents to sabotage a ship and only made it look like it broke down out of old age?

I can picture it: "Yaakov, you put the screwdriver in the engine hole, that way nobody will know it was us".

Maybe that screwdriver has someone initials?

 

[S.A.M.]

They've released pictures of the cargo on the ships [Photos: Aymen Mohyeldin]

Toys, including a Pikachu backpack [according to a commentor on the page, Pikachu can be considered a deadly weapon since he can evolve to Raichu storing 100,000 volts of electricity in his Islamo-fascist cheeks!]


Medicine

Wheelchairs

Notebooks

Any bets if this cargo will reach the Gazans or will be stolen by the Israelis and auctioned off?

 

[CheskiChips]

Sorry. I don't understand how combs are relevant. Please explain.

I can't figure out what you don't understand, can you please elaborate?

I wrote you a post correcting you on this point yesterday. Did you (a) not see it, (b) ignore it, (c) forget it, or what?

There's 29 pages of nonsense, I've probably read 1/29th of it.

 

[Mr.Spock]

Hows this for evidence(James please correct me if my information is wrong) the ships were attacked 70 miles out from Israel. A state can only act to prevent for immigration and the such in an area that includes teritorial waters and the contigenious zone which generally combine to extend out 24 nautical miles from the baseline of the tide. anything farther out cannot be boarded unless it is infringing on the economic resources. being 70 miles out puts them out side of the zone where Israel could act legally therefore their actions are a violation of international law.

And again, what are your evidence? a link from the guardian? where are the military reports?

 

[Mr.Spock]

They've released pictures of the cargo on the ships [Photos: Aymen Mohyeldin]

Toys, including a Pikachu backpack [according to a commentor on the page, Pikachu can be considered a deadly weapon since he can evolve to Raichu storing 100,000 volts of electricity in his Islamo-fascist cheeks!]


Medicine

Wheelchairs

Notebooks

Any bets if this cargo will reach the Gazans or will be stolen by the Israelis and auctioned off?

An entire ship for 2 boxes and a wheel chair?

 

[Mr.Spock]

Thanks pj.

Over to Mr Spock for refutation - if he has any, of course.

refute what???? what there is to refute, I dont see any proof!

 

[James R]

I can't figure out what you don't understand, can you please elaborate?

I don't know why I need a comb to watch tv. Never mind.

There's 29 pages of nonsense, I've probably read 1/29th of it.

Fine. When you do me the courtesy of reading my post instead of repeating the same incorrect arguments over again, then we can continue the conversation. Until then, I'll ignore whatever you say to me. Tit for tat.

refute what???? what there is to refute, I dont see any proof!

Do you understand what a prima facie legal case is?

Look it up.