Yeah, they were chanting "we will kill all the jews" and" jihad" in a nice way.
Zionist piracy
- Thread starter Z7575
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, they were chanting "we will kill all the jews" and" jihad" in a nice way.
sure it does, the last time israil blew up a ship of another goverment it caused a shit storm and that was with a goverment WILLING to cover there ass. If they did it again there is all liklyhood that the next lot of ships would be british naval vessals, Australian ANZAC class cruisers, russian aircraft carriers ect. Ie they would be fucked
a person's veiws on jews and Israel are not the same thing. despite what you have claimed and believe Israel and the jews are not one and the same. take me for example. I despise Israel but wish jews the best of fortunes.
There are no special human rights violations here. This seems to me a simple and straightforward breach of international law by Israel.
I'm sure more will come out once Israel starts releasing eyewitnesses, which it has said it will do within 3 days. We certainly need more facts than Israel is currently allowing out.
Obviously.
Perhaps so, but they haven't released the whole film, have they? What has been released by Israel is a carefully chosen segment of film. The mistake some people are making, especially in this thread, is to assume that what Israel wants us to see is all there is.
This was obviously bungled by Israel. They didn't expect the resistance, and when it came they panicked. Unfortunately, people died as a result.
severasl things wrong with this. first off its an oxymoron it cannot be both "yours" and international waters it must be one or the other. secondly it wasn't Israel waters third yes in fact you actually do unless of course you have no respect for the rule of law.
How do you know what they were chanting?
Bells claimed that we took the worst course of action. I pointed out that she is wrong. I doubt your scenario would follow, but thanks for helping me proving my point.
Because I saw it a few days before they set sail.
Spock said:
Where? Link please.
Don't need them, no. But it would be good to see the whole tapes, wouldn't it? It would show how open and transparent Israel is about this. It would show that it has nothing to hide. Wouldn't it?
Also, you missed the point, which was not about how we should see more of the tapes, but how we haven't seen the whole things. See?
How sweet you edited out the part where you wrote Israel delayed the boat.
According to the IDF, they delayed five boats and attacked one [the largest]. They did board all six ships didn't they?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIKgiwqNf_8&feature=player_embedded
You can clearly hear "Haibar" and "Yahud".
Israel can release those tapes with 1000 copies signed by reporters they were untouched and your argument would still be the same from the same reason you decided against the evidence there is an international law breach here by Israel.
that wasnt what you wrote. You wrote they tempered with "MV Rachel Corrie". You edited it for good reason.
I edited it because I realised there were originally eight ships and two were delayed at the starting point, while five others were taken by the Israelis. I don't know where the MV Rachel Corrie falls and I prefer accuracy to assumptions.
killing unarmed civilans is a breach of human rights laws
I edited it because I realised there were originally eight ships and two were delayed at the starting point, while five others were taken by the Israelis. I don't know where the MV Rachel Corrie falls and I prefer accuracy to assumptions.
I wonder if James can give us your original post, just for the sake of argument.
Not if you are an Israeli civilian. Then its justice.
- Status