He was telling to christians.
Quantum Quack said:he was specifically referring to the generation he belonged to... he was saying that that time was soon...ie within 50 years at least......well....we are still waiting...
He most likely was referring to a generation of our species...like a generation of technology. After all, that makes a lot more sense doesn't it?
Lori_7 said:Is that so? And how is it that you know what he meant specifically? You make it sound as if you were there. He most likely was referring to a generation of our species...like a generation of technology. After all, that makes a lot more sense doesn't it?
A good question I have often wondered about is that:
The dude that jesus brought back to life and rescued from his tomb. How long did this guy go on living for ? Why is his life after resurrection not documented. What did he eventually die of...old age?
Why are the miracles of Jesus only reported by the disciples and not someother witness...there must have been many.
Why did they wait so long to put his life down on paper?
Acutally, no. As written in Greek it referrs to those present when he was speaking.Adstar said:So "this generation" is refering to the generation that see's all these signs.
Quantum Quack said:I haven't the slightest idea...really...
I said what I said as an example of how we use selective reasoning when discussing the bible.
How in one moment it can be taken to be literal and in another it is taken metaphorically.
It seems that it is up to the reader to decide which is what, literal or cryptic.
This renders the ability to discuss the bible seriously very difficult.
Jesus may very well have been meaning his generation. In fact there is no reason to think other wise other than crypticising his words.
Maybe just for fun it woudl be good exercise to take a reliable bible and discect all the contentions showing which should be literlly interpreted and which should not be.
I can guarantee you that if the contention is accepted literally and it threatens the belief it will immediately be rendered as cryptic so as to support that belief.
For example:
Garden of eden, Adam and Eve = literal or cryptic?
The great flood - Noahs Ark = literal or cryptic?
Moses getting the ten commandments = literal or cryptic?
Jesus on the cross = literal or cryptic?
So when jesus said "this generation" was he being cryptic or should we assume he was being literal?
What reasoning supports the view that it should have implied meaning other than literal?
Maybe Lora you can ask your buddie why he has placed all of us in this vexatious position of cryptic vs literal?
as an aside:
A good question I have often wondered about is that:
The dude that jesus brought back to life and rescued from his tomb. How long did this guy go on living for ? Why is his life after resurrection not documented. What did he eventually die of...old age?
Why are the miracles of Jesus only reported by the disciples and not someother witness...there must have been many.
Why did they wait so long to put his life down on paper?
The list of questions is endless and all answers supplied by the believer are based on subjective interpretations rather than hard evidence or even sound logic.
Maybe someone should re-write the book in a way that it can be taken literally by all who read it. My guess is it would be a very different book....very.
Lori_7 said:I think you're missing the point a bit...may need a perspective tweak...
The Bible is not just a book. The Bible is a spiritual tool that was written by the Holy Spirit through men, and is to be interpreted to men by that same Spirit. It's meant to be personal. That's not to say that you can't share what you learn but, you don't learn by "studying" it, or getting some degree in theology. And not everyone is going to learn the same things...which is not to say that it is contradictory or inconsistent...just that it's interpreted to many in bits and pieces and according to "need" or purpose, I suppose. It seems to me, from personal experience that the Bible is both literal and figurative and more, depending upon who is reading it and when and why and what God wants to show/teach them. So my advice is, of course and as always, don't look to a "believer" to interpret/explain for you. Your best bet is to take it up with God Himself. He'll show you what you sincerely desire to know...
Quantum Quack said:Look Lori, I almost totally agree with you. If I want poetic inspiration the bible is actuallly a good source. It is when we are expected to dabble in the literal interpretations that I have a significant problem with it.
It may very well be true that the bible has an element of objective truth to it. It may very well be true that Jesus lived and died in a similar manner to that as described. It is when we step beyond the figurative that the message of the bible is actually lost.
I see the bible as a cryptic historic record of mans battle with fear and superstition.
I see the bible as a story of a moral evolution.
I see the bible as a source of incredible wisdom and a show case of enormous folly.
But what I fail to see is why we should ever take any of it as literal. To do so buries the searcher in obscure crypticism and treasure hunt mentalities.
Step out of the book, get into your soul [ heart] and the book has served it's prupose.
Stay in the book and you have a constant paradox of reasoning that you can not escape from.
I ask does it really matter whether the bible is a literal document or not?
Only if you try to make it literal.
Does it really matter what the bible says?
What matters is how it makes you feel and how those feelings change your life.
So Lori, you can see I do agree with you in the main....
(Q) said:And not everyone is going to learn the same things...which is not to say that it is contradictory or inconsistent...just that it's interpreted to many in bits and pieces and according to "need" or purpose, I suppose.
Aside from the fact that the bible has been shown to be contradictory and inconsistent, it is interpreted such that theists are vehemently opposed to one anothers interpretations.
If a god wanted to reveal his word to the masses, he would have made it sparkling crystal clear to everyone, so that misinterpretations never occured.
Hence, inconsistent and contradictory.
(Q) said:Trust me
Only if you promise to take medication for your disorder.
Some people don't want to hear from God, they want to use an "interpretation" that serves some other purpose...probably a selfish one.
Since each person has their own interpretation, which usually contradicts anothers, then no one is listening or only one person is listening. Who is that one person, you?
Here's the logic flaw...
People sin, therefore I don't believe in God.
I wouldn't use that example as it is a weak argument.
Don't rely on people to enlighten you, rely on God.
Yes, we've been down that road before, it's a dead end.
Um, that's what the Bible says to do, and that's what works for me.
Sorry, but you don't follow the bible, unless you've found an interpretation that serves some purpose for you... probably a selfish one.
(Q) said:WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? I HAVE BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH NO SUCH THING, YOU LIAR.
Your doctor diagnosed it, you already told us that story.
I don't have an interpretation, and if I did, it would be no more correct than any other human's interpretation.
You contradict yourself, again.
If you're born again, you know that you don't rely on your own intellect to interpret the Bible, but on the author, the Holy Spirit.
Ok, so the holy spirit interpreted it for you. It is still a single interpretation completely different than anyone elses.
Is it the correct interpretation? If so, you are the only one listening. If not, it is false and you are following false interpretations.