It's working as you speak. We now have an "Black" man as POTUS. Just a couple years ago this would have been almost unthinkable, a couple decades ago impossible and a couple generations ago he'd have been a Slave.
It is now unseemly to say the word "Nigger". Or to call a black man "Boy". We do not need to outlaw the words - people of their own accord cringe, frown and look disgusted when they hear someone speak like this. EVEN if it were their Preacher. Their revulsion itself is enough to temper and modify their behavior of the Bigot. Of course with media and education we can almost completely nullify racial bigotry. Not completely and that may mean it's a predisposition arsing from our tribal past (or not) - but, things are getting better that's for sure.
No one speaks as if they "Own" their wife. If they did they'd be seen as a neanderthal thug. etc...
Was Zoroastrianism actually made illegal in Persia? I don't think it was??? BUT, the social pressure to convert to Islam produced an Islamic Iran today.
Is being a bigot turd illegal? I don't think it is? BUT, social pressure not to be one is producing a more racially tolerant society today and more so in the future.
I see you're still confusing religious belief with other ideologies. But just for the sake of argument, I am going to treat atheists like turds and see how that pans out.
Meanwhile now niggers call each other niggers. And Zorastrianism which did not die out with Islam [it just moved house] is now dying out not because people don't believe in god, but its embarassing when you can't attend your own kid's thread ceremony because you're not a full blood Zorastrian and hence banned from the temple [which perversely, your kid can go to].
Consanguineous religions fall out of favor because people take the more liberal approach when choices are available, perhaps in Persia, they could see the benefits of a religious belief where your blood line did not determine your place in society and who you were allowed to marry. The inbreeders ran around for 2000 years saving what they could of their pure bloodline, but, not surprisingly, as you said, racism has a short lifetime and they are finally breaking up their elite corps.
The Jews have been trying to save what they can of their ethnocentric religion, but if you send an American Jew to Jerusalem, he would be repulsed by the notion that women cannot walk on the same side of the street [even though the top Jewish leaders in the US are all Zionists, Jews themselves have abandoned the notion that you have to be born of a Jewish mother to qualify for their cadre]. So thats another narrow minded religion that is losing its relevance as its followers fall out one by one. So its no surprise that in places where these religions reigned, people overwhelmingly voted for Islam.
So, as you see I agree with the movement of society away from racism. However, if you are saying that theism is racism then you are surely deluded. The position of Islam per se on treatment of unbelievers is one of tolerance [see Surah al Kafiroon]. So yes, unbelievers should be free to lack belief. Thats not bigotry, thats pragmatism.
Last edited: