More nonsense / misunderstanding of what you read. There is NOTHING in your link even about the continents moving, much less anything stating that the rate is higher than previously believed.
The DM tidal forcing effect, which isn't looked into by either research team can explain the big problem which they both currently have, namely:
I've emailed Prof Sakar of Oxford University with this idea:
You don't have a 'theory', you have random wordy guesses which have absolutely no modelling ability.
Don't bother people who actually spent time learning physics with your ignorant delusional nonsense. You don't listen to the people on this forum with working knowledge in any area of physics and while emailing an Oxford professor might get a politer reply it'll amount to the same thing, "You're wrong. Go away".
not denying that could be researched, but it is of lower priority than dark matter at center of the earth, which is much lower priority than the search for unicorns.
Hi IamJoseph, you sound like an intelligent well informed human being and so I'd like your opinion on my alternative to Dark Matter May Be Building Up Inside the Sun
An exotic core within the Sun and Earth could result in extra tidal effects on Earth due to the exotic core being accelerated more strongly towards the Sun's plane of rotation. This would explain the ice ages. The Earth moves up and down in a 100,000 year orbital inclination cycle. Abyssal mixing of the cold bottom ocean with surface waters could be the mechanism for regular planetary cooling which triggers an ice age imo, Internal Tides and their importance to abyssal mixing and the meridional overturning circulation. What do you think?
He works there, sometimes, he isn't the coordinator.
No one is agreeing with you, as they don't know anything about you or what you've randomly guessed. Physicists are using models of the Sun and dark matter and observations to construct physically viable models. You're just making stuff up on a subject you have no understanding of and have no experimental data on. You're deluding yourself if you think people are 'agreeing with you'.
Demonstrate this with a quantitative model.
And you don't.
That you need to learn what the scientific method is.
Don't put words in Ophiolite's writings. He meant rotating. That's the point of this thread: The moon is rotating about its own axis and it is orbiting the Earth. The periods of these two motions are on average equal to one another due to tidal locking, but the instantaneous rates are not equal. That is why we can over time see more than half (59%) of the Moon's surface from the Earth.
Your wrong. Here's the synopsis of what I said:
And this is a sample of his replies:
and later on, the confession:
To which I replied:
Where, in any of the quoted replies do you see agreement?
The one where he says "Well that is certainly a very coherent and plausible argument" of course. This new revelation good tip the balance towards the announcement to the world of a full and complete Theory of Everything, elusive to physicists and mathematicians so far. People who are saying that this thread should be closed are dumb to the fact that the prospect of a new energy source could halt the American military's plans for invading Iran for their 10% world oil and gas supplies. The Israelis are just itching for the go-ahead from the U.S military apparently: Israel needs green light from US to assault Iran – Chossudovsky (6 Aug 2010)