lol. I never thought that any of you would be able to make a pun, let alone something I find amusing. My research is taking a new direction with Andre Bijkerk in the physicsforums site if any readers are interested Carbon dating and half times
Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?
- Thread starter common_sense_seeker
- Start date
I guess it is too much of a change for that new direction to be based on facts instead of inventive speculation.
The method you employ is not 'research', its random unsupported arm waving based on buzzwords and pop science you don't understand. Don't conflate what you do with what actual researchers do, its an insult to people who paid attention in school.
Dr Robert Foot's Mirror Matter Universe Imploded To Become Smoke-Ring Universe
Melbourne University's Physics Department, Dr. Robert Foot's 'mirror matter universe' can answer the question 'Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?' Shadowlands: Quest for Mirror Matter in the Universe
Melbourne University's Physics Department, Dr. Robert Foot's 'mirror matter universe' can answer the question 'Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?' Shadowlands: Quest for Mirror Matter in the Universe
You'll listen to physicists you've never met on subjects you know nothing about, on subjects which they haven't got passed peer review yet you'll ignore it when people with doctorates here tell you you're wrong.
There's no point in you saying "I think a PhD agrees with me" because when a PhD doesn't you just ignore them. You only listen to people who say what you want to hear, you have no interest in truth.
Your link to an imagined new form of matter (and light that can't be seen) is too limited. It forgot entirely about smoke matter.
The full story is there is a lot of smoke and mirror matter postulated, with no evidence.
There is evidence though apparently. Dr Robert Foot kindly replied to my email to tell me so:
Here's the latest findings which fits like a glove for the mirror matter build-up of structure before imploding into our smoke-ring universe, orientation, creating a "preferred direction", or axis, across the cosmos
Titan Raises Tsunamis in Saturn Ring
Yet more circumstancial evidence which fits the exotic matter inner core (EMIC) hypothesis Titan Raises Tsunamis in Saturn Ring
Yet more circumstancial evidence which fits the exotic matter inner core (EMIC) hypothesis Titan Raises Tsunamis in Saturn Ring
It's not precisely modelled, like the article says, so the orbital resonance effect is largely inferred, if I'm not mistaken. The inclination orbits of the moons is therefore most definitely not modelled then. The extra gravitational kick from a moon which is both close and at a high inclination equally fits the measured observations imv.
Last edited:
Here's the latest surprise findings which fits the EMIC hypothesis Sun's activity flies in face of climate expectations
My model says that exotic matter inner core (EMIC) tidal bulges can drastically alter the output of the sun and is a sign that we are entering the early stages of an ice age. The sun gets hotter but the oceans get colder.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
which astronomical variable correlates with your continued descent into self indulgent stupidity?
Being consistent with does not imply justification of.
No observation has ever contradicted the claim "Somewhere in the universe there is a moon made of cheese" but that doesn't mean our observations support such a claim.
Is this too subtle a point for you to grasp? Do you need to have it explained? Its just that you seem to continually fail to grasp why all your links don't support your claims.
Provide your 'model'. If you can't actually provide a model, something which makes quantitative predictions which can then be looked for, then it isn't a model. Models model. What you have is a vague random guess based on ignorance and self delusion. All you've said boils down to "I claim there's something going on in the Sun we don't yet fully understand". No one would deny there isn't still a hell of a lot we don't understand about stars and their interactions with one another and their solar systems. What you're doing is akin to a religious person using 'god of the gaps' arguments, where anything which we don't understand is automatically explained by 'god did it'. Anything which is said about the Sun which doesn't perfectly align with current understanding you say 'My model did it', ie your 'model' is the explanation.
And just like the religious people saying "God did it" your claims have no explanatory power at all.
They took ten year old observations using a visible light telescope looking north, and a radio telescope looking south, and found a difference of 10e-5. Now, if they can find the same results with an optical telescope looking south and a radio telescope looking north, I'll pay attention to it.
Here's something to think about and relates to our misunderstanding of the dark matter interior of the planets, comets and stars imo Massive dark object 'lurking on edge of solar system hurling comets at Earth'
I bet the dark object is non-baryonic, a lot smaller than Jupiter yet still having around four times it's gravitational influence.
Congratulations to common_sense_seeker - finally a post that is interesting and informative (with little nonsense)
I published a book, called Dark Visitor several years ago mainly as I hoped to scare some bright students into becoming interested in the harder sciences (in stead of getting rich on walk street or in law firms). It told of an impending cosmic disaster that would kill all living in the Northern Hemisphere by a permanent new and different type of ice age there* and make life difficult for us who live in the Southern Hemisphere with torrential rains that wash away coastal cities like Rio.
I hoped they would check out the physic in book, which is really a physic book in disguise, and find the predictions of the approaching, dark visitor, which is only detectable by careful study of Pluto's orbit, was completely possible and rethink their career choices.
Although one chapter describes about five different object that might be the dark visitor, including a dense condensate of N & S, the very heavy magnetic monopoles, I suggested it was probable a small black hole. - Certainly that would not be detectable** by telescopes until it entered the solar wind and possibly made a faint "quasar." It did not occur to me prior to your post that perhaps "dark matter" (your "non-baryons", I assume) might also be able to make a small back hole. Perhaps most of it has made small black holes so only their collective gravity is evident?
-------------
* The impulse of it passing makes Earth's orbit slight more elliptic so in N.H. summers are cooler (earth 11% farther from sun) and winters warmer (earth nearer the sun) - which superficially seems like a blessing, but it is in mild winter weather that the greatest snow falls occur and that weather, after passage of the D.V., lasts for months. The following cooler summers of the N. H. do not melt all the accumulated snow so in N.H. the albeda is increasing so even less snow is melted, etc. In about a decade, most of US has permanent snow cover: in a few decades all the world's ports are useless with the lower sea levels and in 100 years it is impossible to remove thick ice sheet covering the N.H., North of the tropics.
Southern Hemisphere winters are colder but the damage is done by the greatly increased summer evaporation of the oceans covering most of the S.H. That evaporation is also the water source for the N.H.'s growing ices sheet as well as the torrential rains falling every summer eve in the S.H.
** larger black holes can be detected by stellar lens effects, but not if they are modest size and are close to earth as then the transit time, seen from earth, in front of the more distant is too short.
I published a book, called Dark Visitor several years ago mainly as I hoped to scare some bright students into becoming interested in the harder sciences (in stead of getting rich on walk street or in law firms). It told of an impending cosmic disaster that would kill all living in the Northern Hemisphere by a permanent new and different type of ice age there* and make life difficult for us who live in the Southern Hemisphere with torrential rains that wash away coastal cities like Rio.
I hoped they would check out the physic in book, which is really a physic book in disguise, and find the predictions of the approaching, dark visitor, which is only detectable by careful study of Pluto's orbit, was completely possible and rethink their career choices.
Although one chapter describes about five different object that might be the dark visitor, including a dense condensate of N & S, the very heavy magnetic monopoles, I suggested it was probable a small black hole. - Certainly that would not be detectable** by telescopes until it entered the solar wind and possibly made a faint "quasar." It did not occur to me prior to your post that perhaps "dark matter" (your "non-baryons", I assume) might also be able to make a small back hole. Perhaps most of it has made small black holes so only their collective gravity is evident?
-------------
* The impulse of it passing makes Earth's orbit slight more elliptic so in N.H. summers are cooler (earth 11% farther from sun) and winters warmer (earth nearer the sun) - which superficially seems like a blessing, but it is in mild winter weather that the greatest snow falls occur and that weather, after passage of the D.V., lasts for months. The following cooler summers of the N. H. do not melt all the accumulated snow so in N.H. the albeda is increasing so even less snow is melted, etc. In about a decade, most of US has permanent snow cover: in a few decades all the world's ports are useless with the lower sea levels and in 100 years it is impossible to remove thick ice sheet covering the N.H., North of the tropics.
Southern Hemisphere winters are colder but the damage is done by the greatly increased summer evaporation of the oceans covering most of the S.H. That evaporation is also the water source for the N.H.'s growing ices sheet as well as the torrential rains falling every summer eve in the S.H.
** larger black holes can be detected by stellar lens effects, but not if they are modest size and are close to earth as then the transit time, seen from earth, in front of the more distant is too short.
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, thanks for the backhanded compliment Billy T. I get where you're coming from with the dynamics of the ice ages and appreciate that you finally acknowledge non-baryonic dark matter as a good alternative to a "mini-black hole" as our dark wanderer. I don't agree with the mini-black hole idea incidentally, it sounds like a deduction of someone who hasn't given the non-baryonic matter due consideration. The advantage of the non-baryonic matter hypothesis is that it can also explain why the moon appears to be moving away from the Earth at a measured 3.7 cm/yr. I propose that the Earth is moving closer to the Sun at a faster rate than the moon is, giving the illusion that the moon is gaining angular momentum via the Earth's rotation and gravity field. The reason why the Earth is moving more rapidly towards the sun is probably due to TWO factors
- The ratio of interior dark matter to outer baryonic is higher in the Earth
- The orbit of the moon takes it into a slightly weaker non-baryonic dark matter gravitational field of the sun
I see you have recovered from your brief bout of sanity.
lol. Yeah thanks, something like that.