The one where he says "Well that is certainly a very coherent and plausible argument" of course. This new revelation good tip the balance towards the announcement to the world of a full and complete Theory of Everything, elusive to physicists and mathematicians so far. People who are saying that this thread should be closed are dumb to the fact that the prospect of a new energy source could halt the American military's plans for invading Iran for their 10% world oil and gas supplies. The Israelis are just itching for the go-ahead from the U.S military apparently: Israel needs green light from US to assault Iran – Chossudovsky (6 Aug 2010)
Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?
- Thread starter common_sense_seeker
- Start date
But you ignore the bit where he says;
"I still don't see how dark matter is supposed to accumulate in planet/star cores, however."
Look, you email this guy, he isn't going to reply with 'fuck off you loon' in case that gets published and it gives him bad press. So he sends out a polite email, with a clue in it as to why your theory is wrong.
But you overlook the problem he highlighted, and concentrated on the polite fluff. He hasn't validated your theory, he's just humoured you.
You know, like the time you got told the orbit of the Ikonos satellite meant it couldn't take pictures at night, and you believed the guy that fobbed you off.
Mayb because its interestin that no mater how clearly its esplaned... som very inteligent people can not understan that even tho the moon rotates on an internal axis... we always see the sam side of the moon from earf.!!!
I'm always learning. I want to know why the moon does not rotate, and if this is the case with all moons.
I see the sun being the main impacter of the planets, however I see the sun itself as being an intrument in a bigger picture. I see also the entire galaxy as being intruments which control this solar system - including the sun. If the earth oscilates to and fro to maintain its distance - too close and it gets sucked up, too far and it is flung into space - this requires a control factor exerted from a source outside the solar system as a maintaining factor: both the pull and run of the earth cannot be upto the sun - nor of the gravity derived from its revolutions. The number of end results, like rain, gas mix, food substances, etc, make a simple mechanical factor non-plausable.
If one decides there is a majestic engineering construct, as is evidenced by the equations we formulate, then this cannot be limited to this solar system. What keeps the sun in its position, even as the entire space is moving at an excellerating speed? Where does this impact begin and end? Dark matter is a counter balance only.
That didn't happen with Iraq in '81. I see Iran a greater threat to the other Islamic states and to Europe - who are far more reliant on oil and weapons commerce here than is Israel.
How can a nuke assist Iran if it will destroy the Muslims in Palestine, Jordan, Syria and Egypt? This issue can only be resolved by restoring the Balfour, sending Jordan's monarch back to Saudi Arabia and facing the truth of the Balfour's corruption being the entire cause of today's terror. The blame in its entirety falls on Europe - but there is none to judge that set of nations and the crimes they keep perpetrating post-W.W.II.
The issue of intergration says it does and must. Nothing within our earth is not intergrated, in both the macro and micro levels. This is the nature of the universe proven by our own planet - by a ratio of being more so than not so. We can also see uniformity in the universe's galaxies - they all spiral out and contain moving sphears - which evidences the factor of intergration.
The reason we don't know what these intergrating factors are is strictly due to our own limitations at this time. It is guaranteed that we will find out more, and transcend the time-space shakles - else we are all doomed.
Intergration? Like
$$ F(x) = \frac {x^n^+^1} {n+1} $$
??
Or were you just spouting non-sensical, unscientific prose?
I liked this part of what you said alright. The simple answer is that the standard model of gravity and supposed induced angular momentum from the Earth is unverified in the lab and can be deduced to be incorrect. See if you can comprehend this 'mindbender' which I've just given sepulchre, the physicist form the nice forum where people don't insult each other:
Citation needed.
Since when did a soft porn site require a citation? The notion of space-time has been superceded Rethinking Einstein: The end of space-time
Last edited:
That didn't justify what I asked you to justify. I asked you to provide a citation that the standard gravitational models have been unverified in a lab. There's plenty of experiments which verify the current models of gravity to as accurate a level as technologically possible, so the predictions of GR have stood up to plenty of tests. Hence your claim seems unjustified. And when I ask you to justify it you provide a link to someone putting forth a theoretical model, which doesn't have anywhere close to the experimental testing of GR. As it happens I'm not unfamiliar with Horava gravity, I'm well aware it was a hot topic in theoretical physics about 2 years ago. It got a lot of initial attention and then it died away when it failed to come up with all the goods people thought it might. Besides, I'm sure that if I tried the 'This topic has had a lot of papers written on it, therefore you should accept what I say' you'd not accept it. After all if you're going to accept arguments from authority or popularity then you must always accept the majority view of physicists and obviously you don't.
Can you provide a reference to a reputable experimental result which demonstrates general relativity is false or a reputable source saying that current gravity models lack any verification. That's what I asked for.
Can you provide a reference to a reputable experimental result which demonstrates general relativity is false or a reputable source saying that current gravity models lack any verification. That's what I asked for.
This implies you can prove candidates for dark matter.
You see, there are observable issues not decided by GR.
So, we need dark matter or a new theory of gravity.
But, of course, dark energy is an additional problem.
Do you have any candidates for this?
The motion of the Earth about the Sun was what CSS was talking about. Dark matter doesn't come into it, as we have viable models for the motion of the Earth. I'm asking him to justify his claims otherwise.
Besides, CSS accepts dark matter so he obviously wasn't talking about that.
Are you using 'decided' in some logic context for no reason or was it just a poor choice of words?
So?
Where did I say I did?
Hey Jack, there's new evidence to support my pet hypothesis of an asymmetric dark matter core of the Sun, Is the Sun Emitting a Mystery Particle?
They should also check the summer/winter data for a pattern which matches the Earth's yearly inclination cycle, which is currently 9 Jan and 9 July. I bet they do which would support the whole hypothesis an absolute treat.
It doesn't, as you have made no predictions about particle emissions, nor do you have a model even capable of doing such quantitative things. Your logic seems to be "If something to do with the Sun can't be immediately explained then its evidence I'm right". Flawed logic, as usual.
Oops, I meant to say "exotic matter innermost core of the Sun and Earth"..
Oops, I did it again, should I have said neutrino matter innermost core..?
No, because that does nothing to justify your position and I suspect that you're simply throwing out as many different buzzwords as you can possibly manage and then when anything is determined about the Sun by people who actually do science you'll then say "Look, I mentioned this ages ago!". Its confirmation bias, because you highlight your 'correct' claim and ignore it was one of fifty, none of which you provided justification for.
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
Common Sense Seeker, entire families of impoverished school children in south Yorkshire are waiting patiently for you to respond to Alpha's request. If you are unable to do so the poor little mites will be forced to conclude that their hero is a charlatan. Will you destroy their faith, or will your put up?