Why is being nude so "wrong"?

Xev said:
A bit. But c'mon - you're trying to tell us what's normal, and yet you're letting yourself be sexually assaulted on a regular basis, and you think that family members would be sexually attracted to each other if they were naked. Not to be mean, but it is kinda funny.
Click to expand...

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
 
Xev said:
A bit. But c'mon - you're trying to tell us what's normal, and yet you're letting yourself be sexually assaulted on a regular basis, and you think that family members would be sexually attracted to each other if they were naked. Not to be mean, but it is kinda funny.
Click to expand...

Yeah Regular basis......Thats what I said now is it LOLOL Go back to sleep XEV
 
What the hell is going on here?

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.

Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?

Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath-of-
God type stuff.

Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.

Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling.

Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness. Earthquakes, volcanoes...

Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave.

Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria!
 
S.A.M:
You're welcome to post relevant data to support your hypothesis.
Click to expand...

Why should I? You have still failed to post any relevant data which demonstrates that the taboo against incest is primarily nature, not nurture. I mean, wtf does this have to do with anything?

Persons who had slept in their parents' bed as children had higher self-esteem, greater comfort about sexuality, reduced sexual guilt and anxiety, greater frequency of sex, greater comfort with affection, and a higher acceptance of casual sex as college students.
Click to expand...

???
 
mountainhare said:
S.A.M:


Why should I? You have still failed to post any relevant data which demonstrates that the taboo against incest is primarily nature, not nurture. I mean, wtf does this have to do with anything?



???
Click to expand...

Where did I say its nature? I just said that familiarity breeds contempt; and that it has nothing to do with wearing or not wearing clothes.
 
I think a positive answer to "do you agree that familiarity breeds contempt" increases your score on the f for fascist test.
 
mountainhare said:
f score = 3.766666666666666666666666. Apparently I'm in the normal range (how weird is that?)
Click to expand...

Because you're not superstitious?

I scored higher than I should have, just because there is some pretty crazy sex going on out there, like congressmen keeping naked 16 year old boys in their closets.
 
2.5 exactly.

Liberal airhead.

They got that wrong.

I'm a liberal stoner. Duh.
 
S.A.M. said:

Not a patch on Sophie B
Click to expand...

Yeah, but I was never really into that song. Surprisingly, the vocal rhythm bothered me, as I recall.

Oh, well.


Guess what shorty thinks when she sees 'mother' right there.
Click to expand...

It is a convenient line. But this whole thing sort of is out of hand.
 
Hard to believe how naive some of the posters are. That is the only way to explain it, the first mistake is to not recognise the enormous differences between male and female...the gap is so klarge you can drive a truck through it yet some here are oblivious. I am dumbfounded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top