DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
It's neat that someone is doing this.
It'd be cool to see if he turns up anything intersting.
It'd be cool to see if he turns up anything intersting.
Yeah. You sortta beat me to it. I hadn't read your post when I made mine. If I had, I might not have posted. It'd seem like a pile-on. Riv's relatively harmless on the scale of things.I spilt some coffee over that ironic moment actually.
That is ... surprisingly big of you to acknowledge, after so many long, bitter debates.One of the disadvantages of looking for ufos in space is that they could be just about anything---satellites, meteorites, space debris,. At that distance pretty much everything looks like a tiny point of white light. Hence the rarity of anything that could be reasonably distinguished as a ufo.
One of the disadvantages of looking for ufos in space is that they could be just about anything---satellites, meteorites, space debris,. At that distance pretty much everything looks like a tiny point of white light. Hence the rarity of anything that could be reasonably distinguished as a ufo.
I know I have admitted to being the ultimate sceptic but really when you look more closely at the pro UFO evidence it suggests firstly a lot of people are misinterpreting what they see and also that even when offered alternate explanation they won't review their position.
I don't think it was faked or a mistaken Jupiter. I think it is quite interesting, but unexplained.That works both ways. Hence the compelling Tehran ufo incident being dismissed as faked or the planet Jupiter by debunkers already sure there's no such thing as flying saucers.
What is really going on.
Well clearly aliens visit.
They exchange advanced technology for their favorite food...humans.
Missing persons???
Where do they go?
The elite profit from the trade and as they control the government so any genuine reports are hidden in the countless reports of fake UFO s.
The elite encourage UFO journalism and see to it that hoaxers are well rewarded so as to increase the ocean of fake reports.
And so when a genuine observation is made the elite call upon their preowned scientists to discredit the otherwise valid account of visiting aliens.
And believe me that is the truth and if you are interested I am available for speaking engagements.
Do you want to buy a book.
Winky wink wink.
Alex
My attempt at humour.Hey you're one positing sinister conspiracies to lie and fake evidence for ufos. Don't cast the first stone from your glass house..
One cannot watch television, read a book, browse the internet or talk with friends without being aware that people lie and fake stuff if it serves their interest. Not "sinister conspiracies"; simply liars and fakers.Hey you're one positing sinister conspiracies to lie and fake evidence
One cannot watch television, read a book, browse the internet or talk with friends without being aware that people lie and fake stuff if it serves their interest. Not "sinister conspiracies"; simply liars and fakers.
To somehow think this is not common is to be irresponsible.
Think what you like MR that is your right.
People are basically lazy. It's much easier to tell the truth than make up some elaborate lie just because you can.
All I have done so far is to ask you for some evidence. And as usual you have tried to dodge the issue rather than actually try to provide any. Can we assume you don't have any, then?Wow! I can really tell I've rattled the gates when the debunkers gather round and start their "it's all fake" rallying chant.
What evidence have you given? None. Do you intend to provide any? Apparently not.And so now we know the game here---ask for evidence, and when the evidence is given, claim it is all faked and made up by some sinister cabal of UFO researchers.
Where's the evidence that these seasoned skeptics were given? Can we look at that rather than relying on more second-hand anecdotes about "seasoned skeptics" and your assurances that important people believe your anecdotes?Funny how even seasoned skeptics admit the Tehran incident actually happened.
Typical. You introduce new irrelevancies when asked to back up any of your claims. You can't be unaware of the dishonesty in your method.
Ironically, Yazata wrote quite a detailed post earlier in this very thread about why he thinks you are so deceived to believe in all this. And I replied briefly to that post.You know what I've noticed. That with all the accusations by scoffers of ufo evidence and eyewitness accounts and photos that none of them confess honestly that they can see how I would be so deceived to believe in all this.
It's one thing to believe nonsense because you know no better. But you have the advantage of having been carefully tutored here in the methods that you could use to really investigate this woo for yourself. And yet you show no interest in doing so - quite the reverse, in fact. You run a mile at the merest suggestion that you do so.If it really is all fake reporting and fake documentaries and fake photos, then there certainly wouldn't be much sense in blaming me for falling for this elaborate conspiracy to make people believe in ufos.
What would "genuous" skepticism look like, in your view?That's how I know skeptics aren't being genuous.
No. You're more often attacked, in my view, for the fundamental dishonesty in the way you discuss (or, rather, fail to discuss) the woo you present. Every time you are pressed on anything, you try to change the subject, or you disappear only to pop in with some new, unrelated, rubbish a short time later.Instead they demonize and attack me for presenting all this evidence as if I am the devil himself.